Tag: Politicians

  • Indian ‘Swindlers List’, Names holding Secret Account revealed.

    Assorted international currency notes.
    Image via Wikipedia

    Seems that this is a plant to let the real culprits get away;typical Black Operation.

    The money the accounts are supposedly holding, at least the Trusts, as CNN IBN points out is negligible when compared to the scams unearthed.

    It is almost two years since the German Government had passed on the names and bank account details of eighteen Indians who had stashed their alleged ill-gotten wealth in the LGT bank of Liechtenstein, a well-known tax haven nation, 190 km from Munich, Germany.

    TEHELKA has accessed 16 of the 18 names, of which we are putting out 15 right now. These names include individuals as well as trusts. At this point, we are putting out 15 names without disclosing details like their addresses, the businesses they are involved in and the total money they have stored away in Liechtenstein. Abiding by the basic journalistic principle of proving the accused an opportunity to present their side of story, TEHELKA has approached each of these individuals involved and is awaiting their response.

    Once these individuals respond, we shall share the full details of who these people are and what they do. We shall also put out their responses. This, then, is the list.

    1. Manoj Dhupelia

    2. Rupal Dhupelia

    3. Mohan Dhupelia

    4. Hasmukh Gandhi

    5. Chintan Gandhi

    6. Dilip Mehta

    7. Arun Mehta

    8. Arun Kochar

    9. Gunwanti Mehta

    10. Rajnikant Mehta

    11. Prabodh Mehta

    12. Ashok Jaipuria

    13. Raj Foundation

    14. Urvashi Foundation

    15. Ambrunova Trust

    The three trusts in this list are registered outside India.

    The government has been claiming so far that a detailed investigation into all the bank account details provided by Germany is underway and making the names public would violate the agreement between two sovereign countries, India and Germany.

    According to highly placed sources, the investigation into the 15 names that TEHELKA is disclosing, is close to completion and the Central Board of Direct taxes would soon prosecute these trusts and individuals under the relevant provisions of the Income tax Act.

    The sources told TEHELKA that the two main charges proved against these individuals are of tax evasion and concealment of income.

    The authorities also believe that some of these account holders could be fronts for high profile individuals. One name in particular is being investigated for suspected links with a well-known Indian politician.

    The name of the chairman of a major Indian corporation is also part of the list, but TEHELKA is holding back his name until we have his full version.

    According to Pranab Mukherjee, the German Government has provided the information under the strict confidentiality clauses of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and hence they could not be disclosed at the stage of investigation.

    However, once the government launches prosecutions, the name would be made public, he had said.

    These 18 names are part of the list of 1,400 clients, which were stolen from the databank of LGT Group, the Liechtenstein bank owned by the principality’s ruling family, and passed on to German tax authorities in 2008.

    The German government had paid as much as €5 million, or $7.4 million, for information on German account holders in Liechtenstein on a disk provided by an informant to the German Federal Intelligence Service, or BND.

    After this, Germany and England had launched massive investigations into the suspected tax evasions and have since prosecuted dozens of their citizens on charges of tax evasion and concealment of income.

    The German Government alone had initiated action against over 600 of its tax payers.

    Besides taking action against its own citizens, the German Government had also shared this information with other countries including India.

    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh: “Investigations are on”

    But the Indian names figuring in LGT Bank list are only a tip of the iceberg. Experts estimate that Rs 65 lakh crores of ill-gotten wealth earned by Indians is stored in Swiss banks alone.

    According to R Vaidyanathan, Professor of Finance at the Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru, the average amount stashed away by Indians in offshore tax havens between 2002 and 2006 was $136.5 billion. “These illegal funds lying in tax havens are not just related to the issue of tax evasion. It is capital flight from India and part of a corrupt nexus between politicians, bureaucrats and corporate companies,” says Vaidyanathan.

    Different Indian governments over the past 20 years have done little to bring this money back by making necessary changes in existing Indian taxation and foreign exchange management laws.

    Besides, the government has been slow in renegotiating double taxation avoidance treaties with different tax havens and making provisions for clauses under which the governments and banks could be compelled to disclose the account details.

    For instance, under the existing Indo-Swiss Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), information on the Swiss bank deposits of Indian residents could not to be revealed until the Indian Government furnishes evidence of criminality behind these banking transactions.

    Pranab Mukherjee: “We can’t reveal the names”

    India enters into DTAAs with other countries to encourage flow of foreign capital and technology, and also to check tax evasion. The purpose of a DTAA is to mitigate the hardship caused by dual taxation on the same source of income. Double taxation on a single source earned by an individual is possible under income tax, as taxation depends not on citizenship, but on residential status.

    To date, India has signed comprehensive double taxation avoidance agreements with 77 countries.

    “I have asked the revenue department to reopen negotiations for all 77 double tax avoidance agreements with all countries that we have entered into so far, so that we can have real time exchange of information on tax evasion and tax avoidance,” Mukherjee had said at the India Economic Summit in November 2009.

    Since the recession hit the economies of developed countries, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has been leading a campaign for transparency in the international banking system, and making the tax havens to necessarily exchange information with other countries where tax evasions are involved.

    The US in particular has been proactive in using the might of its economy to make different tax havens fall in line, and share the names of US citizens who have deposited money in these tax havens.

    For instance, the UBS Bank, a Swiss bank and the world’s largest wealth management company, came under US scrutiny in June 2008 to uncover the identity of US nationals who maintained secret accounts in the bank and were defrauding the American revenue department.

    When the US Government threatened to prosecute the USB Bank, the bank paid a fine of $780 million and also agreed to reveal the details of the hidden assets of US nationals within a fixed time frame failing which it would face prosecution.

    http://www.tehelka.com/story_main48.asp?filename=Ne120211TheList.asp

    Related.

    The magazine claimed that the name of the chairman of a major Indian corporation is also part of the list, but it is holding back his name until they have his full version.

    It is curious that the magazine should talk about 18 when the government had admitted before the Supreme Court that there were 26 such names.

    A TV channel put out its own list, claiming that the list which was officially handed over to the Indian Government on March 18, 2009 includes 12 trusts and 26 beneficiaries.

    The channel claimed that the list that Germany shared with India had 12 trusts out of which four belong to Indians.

    The individuals listed by the channel included the following names:

    1. Ishwerlal Gandhi
    2. Madhu Gandhi
    3. Mirav Gandhi

    In addition, one of the names Chintan Gandhi was repeated twice in the TV channel’s list. So that makes a total of 15 (12 by the magazine + 3 by the TV channel) out of the 26 individuals, leaving out the suspense on the other 11, which clearly would be more prominent names

    The TV channel also listed the following trusts as belonging to Indians which are included in the German list:

    1. Ambrunova Trust
    2. Marline Management SA
    3. Marnichi Trust and
    4. Socalo Stiftung.

    But the channel added that the money in the trust accounts totals to just Rs 52 crores. Clearly, the individuals concerned also would not let the money lying there, and the mystery over the 11 names therefore assumes even more importance because someone out there wanted some names revealed but at the same time ensured that others were kept hidden.

    Another TV channel is providing account numbers and claims to have linked three of the Mehta names to the IPL Kochi bid.

    http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?710878

    New Delhi: CNN-IBN has accessed the list of Indians who hold accounts with Bank of Lichtenstein.The list which was officially handed over to the Indian Government on March 18, 2009 includes 12 trusts and 26 beneficiaries.But the money in the trust accounts totals to just Rs 52 crore – is this a black money whitewash?

    The list that Germany shared with India had 12 trusts out of which four belong to Indians.

    CNN-IBN has accessed the details of 13 beneficiaries in the four trusts which are the Ambrunova Trust, Marline Management SA, Marnichi Trust and Socalo Stiftung.

    And list the beneficiaries include Hasmukh Gandhi, Ishwerlal Gandhi, Madhu Gandhi, Chintan Gandhi, Mirav Gandhi, Manoj Dhupelia, Rupal Dhupelia, Mohan Dhupelia, Chintan Gandhi, Dilip Mehta, Arun Mehta, Arun Kochar, Gunwanti Mehta, Rajnikant Mehta, Prabodh Mehta and Ashok Jaipuria.

    Enforcement Directorate sources have told CNN-IBN that the accounts are fronts for some powerful people.

    http://ibnlive.in.com/news/black-money-list-out-mystery-accounts-revealed/142436-3.html

  • .கருணாநிதியின் வாதம்.2G அலைக்கற்றை ஊழல்,

    karuanidhi's family.

    -திராவிடர்களுக்கு எதிராக தமிழக பார்ப்பனர்களும் (சோ,சுவாமி ) மற்றும் ஆரிய ஊடகங்களும் கிளப்பவிட்ட சதி.
    சோவிற்கும் சுவாமிக்கும் எந்த அளவு மக்களிடையே செல்வாக்கு உள்ளது என்பது அனைவரும் அறிந்தததே .
    மேலும் இந்த ஊழலைப்பற்றி சுவாமி ஒரு வருடத்திற்கு முன்பே பிரதமருக்கு தெரிவித்து உள்ளார் .அப்போது இந்த வாதம் எங்கே போயிற்று ?இதுவரை ஏதும் பேசாமல் இருந்தது ஏன் ?
    அவரின் புகார் வர்த்தக நிறுவனங்கள் அவர்களால் நியமிக்கப்பட்ட ‘lobbyist ‘அரசாங்கத்தை நடத்துகிறது ,அந்த நிறுனங்கள் என்ன ஆதாயங்கள் பெற்றுள்ளன அது எதனால் என்பதுதான்..இதற்கு,மறுமொழி மழுப்பலாக இருந்தததால் ,உச்ச நீதி மன்றம் சென்றுள்ளார்..
    CAG அறிக்கை எவரால் தயாரிக்கப்பட்டது ?அது எந்த ஒரு விஷயத்திற்காக மட்டும் அமைக்கப்பட்டுள்ள அமைப்பு அல்ல .அரசின் நிர்வாகத்தில்  எந்த முறைகேடு இருப்பதாக சந்தேகப் பட்டால் அது அறிக்கை வெளியிடும்.
    உச்ச நீதி மன்றம் பார்ப்பனர்களால்  நடத்தப்படுவது அல்ல..
    ஆரியர் சதி என்றால் ஆரியர்களே சதிக்கூட்டம் என்பதுதானே ?
    நீங்கள் உறவு கொண்டிருக்கும் சோனியா காந்தி திராவிடரா?அல்லது ‘நிலையான அரசு தருக ‘ என்று அழைத்த இந்திரா காந்தி ஆரியரா ?உங்கள் குடும்பத் தொலைக் காட்சிகளை நடத்துபவர்கள் தமிழர்களா ?
    சோ இந்த விவகாரத்தில் , முறைகேடுகள் வெளி வந்தவுடன்  கருத்து தெரிவித்தார்.
    ‘அவதூறு வழக்கு ஊடகங்கள் மற்றும் சோ சுவாமி மீது தொடருவேன் ‘
    இது வரை தொடரவில்லை என்பது இருக்கட்டும்..
    ஓலி நாடாக்களை வெளியிட்ட outlook மேல் ஏன் தொடரவில்லை?
    அது சரி , ஒலிநாடாக்களில் இருப்பது எங்கள் நபர்கள் இல்லை, அது மிமிக்ரி  என்று ஏன் மறுக்கவில்லை ?
    யாரோ ஒரு உதவியாளர் நில பேர விவகாரத்தில் சம்பந்தப்ப்டுள்ளார் என்பதற்கு சம்பந்தப்பட்டவர்கள் மட்டுமே தெரிந்துகொண்டிருக்கக்கூடிய  விஷயங்களை உங்கள் துணைவியார் நீட்டி முழக்கி அறிக்கை விடுப்பது ஏன்?
    இத்தனைக்கும் அவரை நேரடியாக யாரும் குற்றம் சாட்டவில்லை .
    அப்படி இருக்க , நேரடியாக குற்றம் சாட்டப்பட்ட ராசா ஏன் அறிக்கை விடவில்லை ?
    துணைவியாருக்கு வரிந்து கட்டாத கருணாநிதி , ராசாவுக்கு வக்காலத்து ஏன்?
    நிருபர் ராசா வீட்டில் CBI சோதனை பற்றிக்கேட்டதற்கு ‘நீ ஏன் பாடு  படுகிறாய் ?உன் வீட்டிலா சோதனை’ என்பது ஏன்?
    பார்பனர், ஆரியர் சதி ,CAG அறிக்கை இறுதி அல்ல ,சிபிஐ  விசாரணை வழக்கமான (?) ஒன்று ,ராசாவை விசாரணைக்குத்தான் அழைத்தாகள்,அது ஒன்றும் இல்லை .
    இதுதான் கடமை ,கண்ணியம் மற்றும் கட்டுப்பாடு .

    (please read my blogs under Radia tapes,Politics,Business,Corruption,Politicians ,Politics)

    இதையும் படிங்க;

    http://ramanisblog.in/2010/12/25/sarkaria-report-veeranam-scam/

  • Radia & R.K. Chandolia Tapes.

    Karunanidhi
    Image via Wikiped

    25-188819-0-17-20090522-091706.mp3http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?268618

    Postscipt: It’s been pointed out to us that the gentleman in this audio is Mr  A. Raja’s key aide, Mr R.K. Chandolia]

    Journalists played a key role, says Radia. “Congress ne to statement Thank God issue kar diya. Barkha ne karwaa liyaa us se.” The guy confirms the statement. “Haan woh to maine dekh liya. aa gayaa naa Manish Tewari kaa“.  Radia is busy speaking to a “minister” at “2 o’ clock” lobbying for Raja.

    Related:

    Burka Dutt in her defense.

    As a journalist, whose work has been consistently hard-hitting and scathingly critical of the ongoing 2G scam and the former telecom minister, I am astonished, angered and hurt to see the baseless allegations against me in sections of the media this week.

    While there is no doubt that journalists must be held to the same exacting standards of accountability that we seek from others, the allegations in this instance, as they relate to me, are entirely slanderous and not backed by a shred of evidence.

    The edited conversations between PR representative Nira Radia and me have been headlined to suggest that I misused my role as a journalist to “lobby” for A. Raja, a man I have never met.

    While this is completely untrue, I can understand the anger and anguish that such a misrepresentation can create, among viewers who rely on me to report honestly and impartially. And I would like to address some of the questions raised by these edited transcripts.

    The tapes seem to add up to hundreds of hours of conversations between Nira Radia and people from different backgrounds, including scores of well-known journalists and editors from all the major media organisations (TV and print) in India.

    Despite this, much of the commentary has been strangely selective in its focus. And quite often, vindictively personal. Consider, for example, that online it is being dubbed “BarkhaGate.”

    I cannot speak on behalf of any other journalist on the tapes. Framed in the backdrop of a larger media debate, every journalist’s conversation on these tapes must, of course, be evaluated on its own merit. So, speaking only for myself, the insinuation made by the magazines are preposterous.

    By definition, the insinuation of “lobbying” implies either a quid-pro-quo of some kind or a compromise in how I have reported the story. As anyone who has watched my coverage of the ongoing 2G scam over the past year would know – to suggest either is entirely absurd. (Attached below are links to several shows hosted by me on the 2G scam over the last two years.)

    In several different statements, I have already challenged two newsmagazines who first carried the allegations to establish any proof of a quid-pro quo or a bias in reportage.

    I know that neither charge stands the test of any scrutiny.

    For those perplexed by the ongoing debate, it could be useful to understand the context in which these conversations took place. The few, short conversations took place in the backdrop of cabinet formation in 2009, when the DMK had stormed out of the UPA coalition over portfolio allocation.

    In this instance, Nira Radia, was clearly plugged into the inner workings of the DMK, a fact we only discovered when she rang up to tell me that the news flashes running on different news channels were incorrect; the stalemate between the DMK and the Congress had not yet been resolved.

    She corroborated her claim by saying she was in direct contact with the DMK chief and was in fact with his daughter, Kanimozhi. We talked about news developments within the DMK and the Congress and nothing I said was different from what I was reporting on TV minute-by-minute.

    Ironically, the one sentence being used to damn me, “Oh God, What should I tell them”, is in fact two separate sentences, neither of which are related to A Raja or the telecom portfolio at all. When transcripts are edited and capture neither tone nor context, the message is severely distorted.

    The phrase “Oh God,” was nothing more than a response to a long account by Nira Radia on a DMK leader, T.R. Baalu, speaking to the media without sanction from the party. The excerpt, “What should I tell them,” was in response to her repeatedly saying to me over several different phone calls, that if I happened to talk to anyone in the Congress, I should ask them to talk the DMK chief directly.

    As a matter of record, I never passed on any message to any Congress leader. But because she was a useful news source, and the message seemed innocuous, I told her I would. Ultimately, I did no more than humour a source who was providing me information during a rapidly changing news story.

    AT NO STAGE WAS I EVER ASKED TO PASS ON ANY MESSAGE TO INTERCEDE ON BEHALF OF A PARTICULAR MINISTER OR PORTFOLIO.

    NOT ONCE, WAS I ASKED TO “LOBBY” FOR A. RAJA. NOT ONCE WAS I ASKED TO CARRY ANY MESSAGE REGARDING HIM OR ANY OTHER APPOINTMENT.

    Anyone who has bothered to read the entire transcript of these conversations instead of just the headline, would notice that the conversation is essentially a journalist soliciting information from one of the many people plugged in – something all journalists do as part of newsgathering. And as journalists, we also often humour our sources without acting on their requests.

    The only “benefit” I ever got from talking to Nira Radia was information; information I used to feed the news.

    It is important to remember that at this point, in May 2009, none of us were aware of the present investigation against Nira Radia. Like most other journalists in India, I knew Nira Radia professionally as the main PR person for the Tata Group. In this instance, she clearly represented one side of the story.

    She was just one of many people I spoke to as is typical in such news stories.

    As journalists we deal with different kinds of people, who sometime solicit information and at other times, provide news leads. Unless we believe in only press-conference driven journalism, the need to tap into what’s happening behind-the-scenes in the corridors of power involves dealing with a multitude of voices, and yes, we cannot always vouchsafe for the integrity of all those we use as news sources. We concern ourselves primarily with the accuracy of the information.

    But, I must come back to my original objection to what the two magazines have implied.

    Strangely, when I complained to the editor of Openmagazine about the smear campaign against me, he sent me a text saying , there was “not much remarkable” in my conversations and went on to even say that, “there is one bit in the strap where the word go-between is used that I don’t like myself.”

    I have to wonder then, with anger, why he did not pause before using such a defamatory description.

    Are there learnings in this for me? Yes, of course there are.

    Looking back with the benefit of hindsight and with what we know now, I realise that when we talk to people who represent or belong to the power establishment, there can be a danger in sailing too close to the wind, even for those of us who are experienced and are driven purely by a deep passion for news.

    The takeaway from this debate for me pertains to the everyday practice of journalism. I think of how different kinds of people, who could be potential sources of news, call me, and indeed all editors in this country every day, with different requests ranging from complaints about stories to requests for coverage and yes, sometimes we are also asked to pass on innocuous bits of information.

    Never have these requests—nor will they—dictate the agenda of my news decisions. But, the calls that we treat with polite friendliness, to keep our channels of news open, clearly need to be handled with more distance. This controversy has made me look at the need to re-draw the lines much more carefully.

    There is also another learning. I have always operated by a code of ethics that holds me as accountable to the public as the politicians I grill on my show. The selective and malicious nature of some of the commentary against me has reinforced my awareness of how responsible we ought to be before we level an allegation against another.

    While a genuine debate on media ethics is always welcome in the quest for self improvement, I hope this debate will also look at what amounts to character assassination.

    http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/2010/11/27/barkha-dutt-on-the-allegations-against-her/

  • K’taka CM agrees to 2nd floor test on Oct 14.

     

    The Vidhana Soudha, the seat of Karnataka's le...
    Image via Wikipedia

     

    The farce of democracy is in full swing.

    -En masse self adduction(?) of legislators.

    their open demand for reconciliation.

    partial acceptance of the demands by the CM.

    -CM’s declaration each of the legislators have been bribed.

    the mediation(?) by the erst while nemesis of the CM( Reddy Bros)

    disqualification of the legislators by the Speaker,despite the fact that independent MLAs can not be disqualified under Anti-Defection Law.

    -party MLAs can not also be disqualified before they defy the party whip or vote against the Government.

    -Governor’s unsolicited advice prior to Speaker

    -CM stating he shall parade the MLAs in Delhi before the president( at this rate he will parade them any where excepting in Vidhana Soudha)

    _ Kumaraswamy openly instigating MLAs.

    Intention of the MLAs has been clear when they blackmailed the CM.Then and there they should have been disqualified.

    Anti defection law must be to prevent destabilization and not taking action after destabilization.

    Governor is within his rights to demand Second floor test

    Story:

    The BJP government in Karnataka is in an open war with Governor HR Bhardwaj who termed Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa’s floor test a “farce” and offered him the chance of a second trust vote on October 14.

    The BJP called for the immediate recall of Bhardwaj accusing him of abusing his power to destabilize the government.

    Yeddyurappa has reportedly accepted the Governor’s challenge and agreed to face a second trust vote, according sources. The CM has written to the Governor agreeing to prove his majority in the state Assembly on October 14.

    egykori végzet
    AfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDetect languageDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddishAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish 

    Detect language » Hungarian
    AfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDetect languageDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddishAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish

    Detect language » Hungarian
  • Naxal elements part of our society.


    Naxal Dominant area

    First sane statement from any politician.The problem is not one of Law and Order but of the rage of the neglected regions,castes and unthinkable difference between the rich and the poor.Successive Governments have been paying lip service by announcing paper schemes and the political parties have been sabotaging the programmes for votes, for undoused embers shall get votes.
    Unless the problem is attacked at the sociological level by developing the areas and improve literacy, the problem shall continue.How about placing these states really under President’s rule and only administrative work is carried out in a time bound manner for 10 years?

    Story:

    NEW DELHI: Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar said an “integrated approach” was needed to tackle the Naxal menace as “enforcement action alone” would lead to their wider alienation.

    Addressing a meeting of Naxal-affected states convened by the Prime Minister, the Bihar chief minister also attacked the Centre for not providing requisite support to his state for tackling the menace.

    Stressing on the need for an “integrated approach” against Left-wing extremism, Kumar said, “Enforcement action alone leads to wider alienation, making heroes out of the leaders of the extremist organisations and leads to only symptomatic treatment, leaving the underlined disease to reappear in a more virulent form.”

    “Naxal elements are a part of our society even though they have been misled into following the path of violence,” he said.
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Naxal-elements-part-of-our-society-Nitish-Kumar/articleshow/6167097.cms#write