Tag: Naram Sin

  • Menes First Pharoah Son of Sagara Solar Dynasty India.

    Menes First Pharoah Son of Sagara Solar Dynasty India.

    The First Pharaoh of Egypy,Menes is identified as the son of Sagara, Emperor belonging to Surya,Solar Dynasty of India.

    Menes ,the First Pharoah of Egypt was Asamanja , the son of  Emperor of Sagara.

    Sagara was  from Kosala Kingdom of India.

    One may recall his descendant ,Bhagiratha brought River Ganga to Earth.

    Lord Rama belonged to Solar Dynasty and Sagara was his ancestor.

    The Kings List of Sumeria and the Kings List of Egypt confirm this.

    The reference to Sumeria is found in Indus Valley.

    This has been brought out by researcher Waddelll in his Book.

    I have provided the link to his work at the close of this article.

    He also presents evidence to the effect that the  Sumerian Kings List and the Egyptian Kings List confirm that the Sumerians preceded the Egyptians and both these trace their ancestry to Indian Solar Dynasty.

    The study is backed by deciphering the Sumerian ,Egyptian and Indus valley Seals,Tablets,Hieroglyphics and archaeology.

    And of course, the literature of these three civilizations.

    Not surprising at all.

    Considering the facts,

    Rama,Dasaratha and Bharatha find their names in the Sumerian Kings List.

    Akkadian civilization preceded the Sumerian civilization.

    And Sage Angirasa founded the Akkadian Empire

    Hindu OM is found in Sumrian Prayer

    Tamil city found in Sumeria,Akkadian

    Naramsin of Akkad.

    Tamil city in ancient Syria

     

    Menes,( C  3150 BCE) is the legendary first king of Egypt who is thought to have united Upper and Lower Egypt through conquest and founded both the First Dynasty and the great city of Memphis. His name is known from sources such as Manetho’s Chronology (3rd century BCE), The Turin King List, and the Palermo Stone as well as from some scant archaeological evidence such as ivory engravings. In the early days of Egyptology, Menes was accepted as the first historical king based upon the written records. As time went by, however, and archaeological excavations failed to turn up any evidence of such a king, scholars began to question whether he had actually existed or was, perhaps, a composite figure drawn from the memory of the reigns of other kings.

    Source. http://www.ancient.eu/Men

    Menes,First Pharoah of  Egypt.

     

    But here it is noteworthy, that in the Indian list of kings 
    given in the Puru version of the Indian Aryan King- 
    Lists — that is in that version which preserves especially full 
    details of Menes' dynasty as Manasyu of Gopta — we find that 
    the immediate successors of Manasyu' s dynasty are Nine kings, 
    whose names equate to a considerable extent with those of the 
    Ntne kings forming the Second Dynasty in the lists of Manetho 
    and the others. And these nine kings were clearly the local 
    successors of Manasyu's dynasty in Egypt and not in Meso- 
    potamia, for they are absent in all the main-line lists of 
    the Early Aryan kings, who, we have found, were kings of 
    Mesopotamia. 1 
    
    In this Indian Puru version of the kings who immediately 
    succeeded Manasyu's dynasty, is given a string of nine 
    names of which the holders are described as the " sons " or 
    descendants of Raudrashwa, a personage who is therein 
    (MBt. I. 94) called a " brother " of Sargon (or Pra-Vira, 
    see p. 4) ; and who is stated to have married " the 
    nymph " Misri-Keshi, whose name Misri is suggestive of 
    the old name Misr for Egypt. 2 And Sargon's father was, 
    as we have seen, a Predynastic Pharaoh of Egypt. This 
    presumes that Raudrashwa was an elder brother of Sargon 
    and was resident in Egypt. And the fact that he did not 
    succeed his deposed father in the kingship in Mesopotamia 
    could be explained by his having died before the reign of 
    the usurper Zaggisi, i.e. before Sargon had attained manhood 
    and recovered his father's empire ; for Sargon being a 
    posthumous son could not have had a younger brother. In 
    this view therefore, there were resident in Egypt, contem- 
    porary with and during the reign of Sargon's or Menes'

    The first clues to these discoveries were gained by my 
    observation that Menes (as he was called by the Greeks) or 
    Manj (as he is usually called in his own Egyptian inscriptions) 1 
    appears in his due chronological position along with his 
    dynasty in the official king-lists of the Early Aryans from 
    the first king onwards, as preserved in the ancient Indian 
    epic chronicles, the Puranas. In the latter he bears the name 
    of Asa Manja, or " Manja the shooter " in the solar version 
    of these lists, and Manasyu or Mawas-the-Uniter in the lunar 
    version. 2 And the great Indian epic, the Maha-Bhaxata, in 
    supplementing the Purana chronicle account, describes 
    him as " Manasyu of the line of the Prabhu [Parda or 
    ' Pharaoh '], the royal eye of Gopta [Kopt or Egypt] and 
    of the four ends of the earth." 3 The Indian epic king-lists 
    further record that he was the son and successor of the 
    mighty world-emperor, King Kuni or Sha-Kuni or Sagara, 
    whom I had fully identified with the Mesopotamian world- 
    emperor, whose name is variously spelt Kin, Gin, Gani, 
    Guni, or Shar-Guni, a name which is arbitrarily semitized by 
    Assyriologists into " Sargon," in order to equate it with 
    the Hebrew name " Sargon " of the much later notorious 
    Semitic Assyrian king of that name in the eighth century B.C. 
    who carried the Jews into exile, and from whom they dis- 
    tinguish the former as " Sargon-the-Great." 
    
    On comparing these Early Aryan king-lists with those of 
    the Sumerians in Mesopotamia,* I observed that the latter 
    documents also recorded in the self-same chronological 
    position the dynasty of King Gin or Guni (" Sargon-the- 
    Great "), bearing substantially the same names and titles as 
    in the Indian lists and in exactly the same order ; and that 
    the names and order from " Sargon's " son Manis onwards 
    were identical with those of Menes' dynasty of Pharaohs on 
    
    1 See later. 2 See pp. ^i. 3 See p. 4 and App. I. 4 Kish Chronicle. 
    
    
    
    MENES AS SON OF SARGON-THE-GREAT 3 
    
    
    
    their own Egyptian monuments. Menes or Manj in his 
    Egyptian inscriptions usually bears the title of " Manj- 
    the-Warrior," and in the Sumerian king-lists and in his own 
    inscriptions in Mesopotamia, the son and successor of 
    " Sargon-the-Great " is styled " Manis-the-Warrior." And 
    the last king of this dynasty, bearing the same name in both 
    Sumerian and Egyptian inscriptions, has his name signifi- 
    cantly written on his own Egyptian inscription by the 
    self-same Sumerian pictographic signs as in the Sumerian 
    king-lists and in his own inscriptions as Sumerian emperor 
    in Mesopotamia. 
    
    Further comparison disclosed that Menes' father, " Sargon- 
    the-Great," along with the latter's father and grandfather 
    were identical in names and titles with the three Predynastic 
    Pharaohs who immediately preceded Menes in Egypt ; and 
    who have left there their records, seals or sealings in 
    Sumerian script. And these identities are confirmed by their 
    own Sumerian inscriptions in Egypt, and by their official 
    seals in their Indus Valley colony, in which most of them 
    bore also the title of " Pharaoh," and mention Egypt by 
    name as being within their empire. 
    
    Let us now examine the detailed proofs for these identities 
    of Menes or Manj and his " predynastic " ancestors in 
    Egypt with those of Manis and his immediate imperial 
    Sumerian ancestors in their contemporary inscriptions in 
    Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley and in the Indian epic 
    records of the Early Aryan kings. 
    
    Menes or Manis-Tusu as Manasyu the " Pharaoh 
    of Gopta " (Egypt) in the Indian Epics 
    
    The name of this Aryan king under the form of Manasyu 
    is found in the lunar version of the Indo-Aryan King-Lists, 
    and corresponds to the solar form of his name as Asa 
    Manj as or Asa Manj a in the solar main-line lists in which 
    he is No. 38 (see Table, p. 151) — the solar lists 1 being the 
    most complete and in undisturbed chronological order. 
    And " Sargon " in this Puru version is called Pra-Vira or 
    " Foremost hero," in which Vlra corresponds to his Sumerian 
    title of Pir, 2 V being a very late invented letter. 3 
    
    1 Lists of the purer Sun-worshippers. 2 WMC. 200. 3 See WAOA. 49 f . 
    ....  
    
    
    The fuller Egyptian form of Menes' name as Manj, 
    strikingly confirms the literal identity of the Egyptian with 
    the Sanskrit Manja (or Asa-Manja), the son of the Emperor 
    Sagara, that is Sargon ; and it equates also phonetically 
    with the Manis name of Sargon's son in Sumerian — the 
    affix Tusu meaning, as seen below, " The Warrior." This 
    fuller Egyptian form of Menes' name is usually disguised by 
    many English Egyptologists as Mena. But the alphabetic 
    value of the last letter is rightly rendered by the Berlin 
    school as J} which is now seen to be its proper value by 
    our trilingual comparison ; and this is confirmed by the 
    pictorial form of this Egyptian hieroglyph which pictures a 
    flowering reed, which I observed was the same sign, form, 
    sound, and meaning as the Sumerian pictograph of the 
    flowering reed word-sign with the phonetic value Gi 2 — thus 
    affording another of the many instances I have demonstrated 
    of the derivation of the Egyptian hieroglyphs from the 
    Sumerian pictographs, with the same pictographs, form, 
    phonetic value and meaning. 
    
    ....
    of the two crowns of Upper and Lower Egypt." Under 
    his other Indian name as Asa-Manja, or " Manja the 
    Shooter," is described in the Indian Chronicles, his quarrel 
    with, and disinheritance by, his father, Sagara (Sargon), 
    which, we shall find later, appears to relate to his declaration 
    of independence in Egypt during the lifetime of his father 
    in Mesopotamia ; and thus explaining why Sargon's younger 
    son succeeded his father on the Mesopotamian throne and 
    not Manis-Tusu, his eldest son, who only succeeded later. 
    
    Identity of Menes with the Aryan Emperor Manasyu 
    & Manis-Tusu, son of Sargon, confirmed
    Source and Citations. Egyptian civilization and Its Sumerian Origin Real Chronology by Waddelll
  • Angirasa Founder Pre Sumerian Civilization Akkadian Empire?

    I have written on the presence of artifacts in the middle east, areas surrounding it in Europe which indicate the presence of  Sanatana Dharma and Tamil in the culture of Mesopotamia  and Sumeria.

    Akkadian Civilization remains
    Akkadian Relgious artifact.Trishul or Subrahmanya’s Spear?

    Kings' List, Akkadian Empire
    Akkadian King List. Note the similarities to Sanskrit Names.

    1.Lord Rama’s Chapel was found in UR, Iraq.*

    2.A burial ground called as Nagar is fond in Syria. It is called Tel Brak now.

    3.Idols of Rama,Sita and Lakshmana are found.*

    4.Ancestors of the Syrians were the Halaf and Ubaid.

    They date back to 6100 BC.

    They had connection with the Tamils and this is reflected in the ruins of  Nagar.*

    These people traded with the Tamils.

    ”Naram-Sin traded with Meluhha (almost certainly corresponding to the Indus Valley civilization), and controlled a large portion of land along the Persian Gulf. He expanded his empire by defeating the King of Magan at the southern end of the Persian Gulf, and conquering the hill tribes to the north in the Taurus Mountains.

    5.Akkadian’s( Forefathers of the Sumerians) Moon God was Naram Sin, Narasimha.*

    6.There are repeated references in the Sumerian/Akkadian language to Meluuha.

    7.Ancient Tamil Brahmi Scripts were found in Oman and Egypt.

    These facts establish that,

    The Tamils were an advanced civilisation by 2200 BC(Akkadian Empire)

    The Hindu Gods and Goddesses were worshiped in Sumeria,

    Names of Lord Rama and Bharata were found in the Kings List of Sumeria.’

    ‘A Tamil-Brahmi script inscribed on a potsherd, which was found at the Khor Rori area in Oman, has come to light now. The script reads “nantai kiran” and it can be dated to first century CE, that is, 1900 years before the present. The discovery in the ancient city of Sumhuram has opened a new chapter in understanding the maritime trade of the Indian Ocean countries, according to specialists in history.

    Tamil city in Sumeria  2200 BC

    OM in Sumerian Prayer 2600 BC

    Haran Shiva In Turkey

    Please read the related posts of the above as well.

    Who are Akkadians?

    The Akkadian Empire /əˈkdiən/ was the first ancient Semitic-speaking empire of Mesopotamia, centered in the city of Akkad/ˈækæd/ and its surrounding region, also called Akkad in ancient Mesopotamia. The empire united all the Akkadian and Sumerian speakers for the first time under one rule. The Akkadian Empire controlled Mesopotamia (modern Iraq, Kuwait, northeast Syria and southeast Turkey), the Levant (modern Syria and Lebanon), and eastern and southern parts of Anatolia(modern Turkey) and Iran, sending military expeditions as far south as Dilmun and Meluhha (modern Bahrain and Oman) in the Arabian Peninsula.

    During the 3rd millennium BC, there developed a very intimate cultural symbiosis between the Sumerians and the Akkadians, which included widespread bilingualism. Akkadian gradually replaced Sumerian as a spoken language somewhere between the 3rd and the 2nd millennia BC (the exact dating being a matter of debate).

    The Akkadian Empire reached its political peak between the 24th and 22nd centuries BC, following the conquests by its founder Sargon of Akkad (2334–2279 BC). Under Sargon and his successors, the Akkadian language was briefly imposed on neighboring conquered states such as Elam and Gutium. Akkad is sometimes regarded as the first empire in history, though there are earlier Sumerian claimants.

    Elam was an Empire of Tamils which exited before the great Flood probably in  Lemuria.

    And there was one more Tamil Empire in the North west of India.

    Please read my article Two Tamil Empires?

    After the fall of the Akkadian Empire, the people of Mesopotamia eventually coalesced into two major Akkadian-speaking nations: Assyria in the north, and, a few centuries later, Babylonia in the south.”

    Now there is a theory that Rishi Angirasa was worshiped/funded the Akkadian Empire

    There seven Seers of Hinduism, who, at the beginning of every time cycle formulate the code of conduct, texts to follow.

    These are called Saptha(7) Rishis.

    They are.,

    Atri,

    Bhrigu,

    Kutsa,

    Vasishta,

    Gautama,

    Kasyapa and

    Angirasa.

    Now. the theory states that.

    ‘The supreme deity of the Sumerian pantheon is AN, or Anu. In the first two letters of the Sanskrit word An-gir-as, AN could refer to Anu. GIR might relate to the Akkadian fire-god— fire as in rocket propulsion. DinGIR in the cuneiform writing meant sky or heaven, and also a god or goddess. The masters of the sky were perceived as deities by the earthbound. This reminds of Angiras and his descendants, the Angirasas, as a group of higher beings who traversed the realms between gods and men — an inter-stellar and inter-dimensional elite…

    The Angirasas and the Bhrigus families “…represent the pre-Rig Vedic past: they go so far back into the past that not only are they eponymous founders of these families (Angiras and Bhrigu respectively), but even certain other ancient Rishis belonging to these families (Brihaspati, Atharvan, Ushana) are already remote mythical persons in the Rigveda; and the names of the two families are already names for mythical and ritual classes: the Angirasas are deified as ‘a race of higher beings between Gods and men’ …the Bhrigus and the Atharvans are synonymous with fire-priests in general. …the names of these two families are also found in the Iranian and Greek texts…” [Shrikant G. Talageri]..

    No one can compare the Avestan poetry with the Indian [Rigvedic] poetry in its content, in its style of expression, and in its entire coloring, without coming to the conclusion, on account of their agreement in small details which force themselves on us at every step, that both the literatures point not only to a common origin of these two peoples and their religions, but also to a community of Indo-Iranian religious poetry, developed in well-established forms.
    [Hermann Oldenberg]

    “The name Anu or Ânava for the Iranians appears to have survived even in later times: the country and the people in the very heart of Avesta land, to the immediate north of Hâmûn-i Hilmand, were known as late as Greek times as the Anauon or Anauoi. The names of Anu tribes in the Rigveda and the Puranas can be clearly identified with the names of the most prominent tribes among latter-day Iranians.”   [Shrikant G. Talageri]..

    ….Malati J. Shendge says “Sanskrit is derived from Akkadian and Sumerian…Sanskrit is not a language of the Aryas…It is essentially a lineal descendent of the languages of the Asuras.” She states that the Rig Veda does not belong to the Aryas and in fact in her view this was “purely an assumption without any firm basis.” And she states “…it is possible to find parallels in the Akkadian sources to many clans and personal names of the poets of Rig Vedic compositions, and of the Asuras, the enemies of Indra.” She believes that the language of the Rig Veda — [meaning the older Vedic Sanskrit which is very different from the latter classical Sanskrit] — is a form of Akkadian and “that the Akkadian in the process of evolution has become what we know today as Sanskrit….

    References and citations.

    Prolegomena on Metre and Textual History of the Rigveda, by Hermann Oldenberg, Berlin 1888; translated into English by V.G. Paranjape and M.A. Mehendale; Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Ltd., Delhi, 2005.

    The Rig Veda and the History of India, by David Frawley; Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi, 2001, 2003.

    The RIGVEDA, A Historical Analysis, by Shrikant G. Talageri; Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi, 2000, 2004.

    The Civilized Demons: The Harappans in Rigveda, by Malati J. Shendge; Abhinav Publications, New Delhi, 1977.

    The Language of the Harappans: From Akkadian to Sanskrit, by Malati J. Shendge; Abhinav Publications, New Delhi, 1997.

    http://metaphysicalmusing.com/articles/rigveda2015/AnuPart1.htm

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akkadian_Empire

    Images credit.

    http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Akkadian_Empire

  • Narasimha Rama Nagar Tamils In Ancient Syria

    The ruins of the Mesopotamian culture reveals more about Indian connection.

    A city,a burial mound,called Nagar was found in Syria.

    Naram SinImage.jpg
    Naram Sin with a false beard and a crown- giving him resemblance to a lion. Narasimha ?

     

    It is now called Tell Brak.

    Narasimha Sculpture.Image.jpg
    A carving of the Hindu god Narasimha (a form of Vishnu). In this image Narasimha is killing a deamon on his lap. In one of his hands he is pulling the eyeballs off another deamon. This angry form of the god is worshipped as a vanquisher of evil. Royalty free image ID 12698889 © Hrishim | Dreamstime.com

    Tell Brak, ancient Nagar, is a tell, or settlement mound, in the Upper Khabur area in Al-Hasakah Governorate, northeasternSyria. The site was occupied between the sixth and second millennia BC. At 40 metres (130 ft) in height, and an area of approximately 130 hectares (320 acres), it is one of the largest archaeological sites in northern Mesopotamia. It was taken over during the “Syrian Civil War” by the People’s Protection Units, as well as its surrounding settlements.

    Their ancestors were the Halaf and Ubaid.

    They date back to 6100 BC.

    They had connection with the Tamils and this is reflected in the ruins of  Nagar.

    These people traded with the Tamils.

    ”Naram-Sin traded with Meluhha (almost certainly corresponding to the Indus Valley civilization), and controlled a large portion of land along the Persian Gulf. He expanded his empire by defeating the King of Magan at the southern end of the Persian Gulf, and conquering the hill tribes to the north in the Taurus Mountains

     

    The location of Meluhha, however, is hotly debated. There are scholars today who confidently identify Meluhha with the Harappan Civilization, in modern Pakistan, on the basis of the extensive evidence of trading contacts between Sumer and this region. Sesame oil was probably imported from the Indus valley into Sumer: the Sumerian word for this oil isillu (Akkadian: ellu). In Dravidian languages of South India el or ellu stands for sesame’

     

    Nagar’ (नगर) is Sanskrit for ‘city’ or ‘settlement’. So is the name Naram Sin, it seems to be a deviation of the Sanskrit ‘narsimha’ meaning ‘man-lion’, a name fit for a king. Narsimha is also another name for the fourth avatar of the Vedic God Vishnu. Here are two steles of the Akkadian King Naram Sin – the link to man-lion is evident.

    There are also finds with three figures resembling either Rama ,Lakshman and Sita or Krishna, Balarama and Subhadra.

    Syrian Archeological Finds, Krishna,Balaraa and Subhadra or Rama ,Lakshmana and Sita?image.jpg
    Syrian Archeological Finds, Krishna,Balaraa and Subhadra or Rama ,Lakshmana and Sita?

    Citation.

    Naram Sin