Ramanisblog

Tag: Isam

  • Vatican Shiva Temple?

    I have posted articles that the Kaaba was a Shiva Temple and a Linga is still in there with authentic links.

    Vatican a Shiva Temple.
    This is the Hindu deity Shiva. This piece is at present on view in the Etruscan Museum at the Vatican in Rome. Encyclopedia Britannica mentions under the headings “Etruria” and “Etruscan” that between the 2nd and 7th centuries BC, northern Italy was known as Etruria

    Sanatan Dhrma spread from the south of the Vindhyas twards the west of India,.

    When Satyavata Manu , ancestor of Lord Rama left for Ayodhya ( in the north of the Vindhya,from the South (his son Ikshvaku fiunded a Kingdom ,Dynasty by the same name),Shiva and Ganesha left  the Dravida Desa ( south)  and traveled through the west, the first stop being what is nowknown as the Arbian Peninsula, which consists of Oman, Dubai and the other Emirates,Saudi Arabia, Iraq,Jordan,Lebanon,Turkey,Greece ,Italy before finally arriving in the Arctic.

    They had the Rig Veda composed in the Arctic and returrned to India through Russia.

    Please read my posts oon each of these places where the footprints of either Shiva/Ganesha are found

    I came across some credible information worth postin g whaich states that the Vatican was built on

    1.Pagan Tempe.

    2.Shiva Temple.

    Story:

    Originally Posted by believenothing

    St. Peter’s Basilica is built on a large pre-Roman and pagan cemetery which included an old temple with red walls. Very little is known about this excavation because it was done by the Catholic Church themselves. It was used to claim that Simon Peter’s bones are actually buried there.Actually, pretty much all of Christdom’s oldest churches are either retro-fitted temples, extensions of temples, or built on the foundation of old temples…

    ” During excavations many such “meteoric stones mounted on carved pedestals” are discovered in Italy. Obviously, therefore, this one was dug up from the Vatican itself. Many more must be lying buried in the Vatican’s massive walls and numerous cellars. Vatican is itself the Sanskrit word “Vatica” applied to Hindu cultural-cum-religious centers as in “Ashrama-Vatica” or “Dharma-Vatica” or “Ananda-Vatica.” Therefore, the Vatican was obviously a Hindu religious seat before its incumbent was forced to accept Christianity.

    “The ancient Vedic custom of applying ash or sandalwood paste to the body is still retained by Christianity in the observance of Ash Wednesday. The so-called “All Soul’s Day” is an exact translation of the Vedic observance of Sarva Pitri Amavasya, the day fixed by tradition for the worship of all deceased ancestors

    .Another Christian tradition derived from Vedic origins is that of having and ringing bells in the churches, especially before or during worship. In Vedic temples it is often seen where bells are rung during worship and when pilgrims enter the temple, announcing their entrance. Christian churches also ring bells to announce the beginning of worship.

    The word “bell” comes from the Sanskrit bal which means strength. This is in reference to the idea that ringing a bell adds force to the voice of prayer in invoking divinity.

    When the Christians say “Amen” at the end of their hymns or to emphasize something, what they are saying is a corrupted form of “Aum” or “Om,” which is a standard form of Vedic meditation and name of the Supreme Being.

    While we are on the topic of words used in Christianity that are derived from Sanskrit, the Catholic term “Madonna,” another name for Mother Mary, comes from the Sanskrit Mata Nah, meaning “Our Mother.” This is also derived from the great Vedic Mother Goddess. Thus, Mother Mary was a reference not only to the mother of Jesus alone, but a reference to the Goddess, mother of all humanity. Furthermore, the European term of “Madam” is a soft pronunciation of the Hindu term mata or mataji, which also means “Mother.”

    The term “vestry” in referring to the room in churches in which holy clothes are kept comes from the Sanskrit word vestra, meaning clothes. Even the word “psalm” with a silent “P” comes from the Sanskrit word sam or sama which means holy and serious sacred songs, hymns or chants, as found in the Sama-veda.

    Other Christian links with Sanskrit words can be found in the name Bethlehem, which is the English mispronunciation of the Sanskrit Vatsaldham, which means “the home (town) of the darling child.” The Sanskrit term Nandarath is linguistically connected with Nazareth. Nandarath means Nanda’s chariot, and King Nanda was the guardian at whose village he nurtured Lord Krishna (sometimes pronounced as Chrisn, and later Christ in some regions).

    The Christian term “Satan” and the Islamic term “Shaitan” both are derived from the Sanskrit term Sat-na, which means non-truth, falsehood, or fraudulence.

    The Christians who explain the term “Devil” as a fallen angel should realize that the word is derived from the Sanskrit terminology which signifies a fallen Deva.”

    More  Research/proof is needed
    Related articles
    Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Should you be able to call your God whatever you want?

    Muslims as a group seem to be sick.May be they do not know what their Religion is all about and they seem to be threatening world order. By their activities they make one feel that the civilization might be better off with out Islam.

    Christians want to use the world Allah for proselytizing.
    Instead of following Christianity they are attempting to increase their numbers as directed by Vatican, which calls a decade’ Decade of Harvest’,by spending huge sums for promotional activities(this is not restricted to Catholics;other denominations have a fair share too).Some promote by instant healing by demonstrating Healing on Stage( I know of people who are being paid to fake illness on stage and recover-funny thing is they are not even Christians ).
    Fortunately or unfortunately Muslims respond in kind unlike other other followers.If Christians really want to use the name Allah, they might do it in private but not for converting others.By the way I am curious as to who, in the familial tree has not been converted at some point of time in the past as Religion is practiced as a matter of privilege of birth rather than conviction.I hope who want to be Religious to read their Religious texts, whether it Be The Bible or The Koran directly with out interpreters like the clergy or mullah for these gentlemen have their own axe to to grind or they are after riches which are being offered by the respective so called Protectors of the Faith.Religion is for self upliftment /realization.It is intensely personal..Be it Sal or Jesus they will be shocked if they were to return to earth to witness the perverted intrepretations of their teachings, which are meant to elevate human beings and not to make them behave like cavemen.

    UPDATE: Three churches have been torched in Malaysia as religion tensions rise. Churches are bracing themselves for further attacks.

    God’s just been to court. Well in Malaysia anyway.

    The Malaysian government has filed an appeal against a court ruling that allows non-Muslims to use the word Allah to refer to God.

    Protests by Muslim groups are breaking out across the country and online. The blogs are going mad over this asking whose God is Allah anyway?

    Malaysia’s Catholic Church says that it uses the word Allah to meet the linguistic needs of some Malay worshippers. The government believes that Allah is solely an Islamic word whilst the court upholds that the term predates Islam.

    The debate got me thinking about how I would feel if another religion used a Hindu term to refer to their God, may it be “Ishwar” or “Krishna”. Whilst I don’t think I’d be angry, I think I might feel a bit uncomfortable.

    Joel Trumpet isn’t impressed at the ruling and he’s a Christian. He feels that by using the word “Allah” Christians are sending out mixed messages.

    For Blogger Lucia Lai however, it’s great news.

    Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak is asking Muslims not to blow this out of proportion, but do they have a right to be angry?

    “The idea of bringing Allah before the courts is abominable as it is abhorrent,” says Sakmongkol. ” In the Malaysian context, Allah has always been the god of Islam. Whose religion is this? It is the religion of the Malays. It is the religion of 15-16 million Malaysians as opposed to the religion of between 850,000 to 1 million Catholics. “

    I’ve been taking a look at various online dictionaries and what they have to say about Allah. I couldn’t find a consensus.
    So is it all about context?

    This blogger feels that both parties are blowing this out of proportion.
    ‘If I were a Muslim, I would probably say, “Oh never mind, let the Catholics go ahead and use the word Allah.
    If I were a Catholic, I would probably say, “Oh never mind, let’s just drop the word Allah and use the word Tuhan instead.’”

    Space between the ears in California disagrees. “How one religion could have a monopoly on a generic term or name is beyond me,” he adds.

    So should you have the right to call your God by any name you please?
    http://worldhaveyoursay.wordpress.com/2010/01/08/should-you-be-able-to-call-your-god-whatever-you-want/#comment-193970