Ramanisblog

Tag: Institute for Advanced Study

  • Big Bang Theory Wrong Science

    Once there was Mass, a bunch of Matter.

     

    It became dense, so the Mass became More.

     

    So much More that its Gravity increased to such an extent that it does not allow even Light to escape from it,

     

    At a point of time, because of this immense density the Mass exploded, creating uneven particles.(Big Bang)

     

    Greater the particle, greater the Mass, hence greater density and this attracted more particles.

     

    This is the Big Bang Theory.

     

    Had this been narrated by ordinary people, people would have loved to laugh at the assumptions galore and lack of facts.

     

    Assumptions are made out as Axioms and you are asked to accept them without questioning.

     

    Theories are developed around this nonsense and to our surprise technology using these principle works!

     

     

    Reason Nature does not care nor is it bothered whether some one believes it or finds about it, for it is not obliged to divulge its secrets.

     

    It goes about its job.

     

    Blackhole in Milkyway Galaxy

     

    Fact is that Gravity works whether Ramanan believes it or not, Light waves travel whether you call it Wave, Particle.

     

    It takes another non sense paper to disprove the earlier theory.

     

    Now comes the paper that proves or attempts to prove that Big Bang Theory wrong.

     

    It takes a swipe at Einstein’s Theory as well, which, it is said, is proved.

     

    You do not expect Nature , whose Lifetime is immeasurable,to reveal its Nature, to Man whose average waking Lifetime is hardly 25 years.

     

    Even if you take the aggregate of entire Human population even from earliest civilization, even then it is negligible against Nature.

     

    The disapproval comes from Mathematics, which, though touted as the best Science,is based on Assumptions galore.

     

    ‘Let the children Play’- Nature.

     

    Story:

     

    • Scientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist
    • She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity
    • Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton said she is still in ‘shock’ from the find
    • Previously, scientists thought stars much larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes when they died
    • During this process they release a type of radiation called Hawking radiation
    • But new research claims the star would lose too much mass and wouldn’t be able to form a black hole
    • If true, the theory that the universe began as a singularity, followed by the Big Bang, could also be wrong

     

     

    If most people know one thing about black holes, they probably know that nothing can escape from them, not even light.

    Yet this most basic tenet about black holes has actually been disproven by the theory of quantum mechanics, explains theoretical physicist Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, NJ, in an essay published online today (Aug. 2) in the journal Science.

    Black holes, in the classical picture of physics, are incredibly dense objects where space and time are so warped that nothing can escape from their gravitational grasp. In another essay in the same issue of Science, theoretical physicist Kip Thorne of Caltech describes them as “objects made wholly and solely from curved spacetime.”

    Yet this basic picture appears to con

    tradict the laws of quantum mechanics, which govern the universe’s tiniest elements.

    “What you get from classical general relativity, and also what everyone understands about a black hole, is that it can absorb anything that comes near, but it can’t emit anything. But quantum mechanics doesn’t allow such an object to exist,” Witten said in this week’s Science podcast.

    In quantum mechanics, if a reaction is possible, the opposite reaction is also possible, Witten explained. Processes should be reversible. Thus, if a person can be swallowed by a black hole to create a slightly heavier black hole, a heavy black hole should be able to spit out a person and become a slightly lighter black hole. Yet nothing is supposed to escape from black holes.

    To solve the dilemma, physicists looked to the idea of entropy, a measurement of disorder or randomness. The laws of thermodynamics state that in the macroscopic world, it’s impossible to reduce the entropy of the universe — it can only increase. If a person were to fall into a black hole, entropy would increase. If the person were to pop back out of it, the universal entropy tally would go down. For the same reason, water can spill out of a cup onto the floor, but it won’t flow from the floor into a cup.

    This principle seems to explain why the process of matter falling into a black hole cannot be reversed, yet it only applies on a macroscopic level

    Citation:http://www.space.com/16867-black-holes-quantum-mechanics-theory.html

     

     

     

    Related articles

  • Universe Illusion A Hologram Physicists Meet Adi Sankara

    ‘Brahma satyam jagat mithya, jivo brahmaiva naparah—”Brahman is the only truth, the world is unreal, and there is ultimately no difference between Brahman and individual self’-Adi Sankara in Viveka Chudamani

    Declared Adi Sankara, the greatest exponent of non Dualism or Advaita,

    Knowledge is relative,There are two kinds of Knowledge.

    Our Universe a Hologram?
    Universe is a Hologram. Image from.http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/09/is-our-universe-a-hologram-in-1982-a-litttle-known-but-epic-event-occured-at-the-university-of-paris.html

    One is Para Vidya which id Eternal and another is Apara Vidya, that is transitory, that is of this temporal world.

    From the Absolute stand point the knowledge we have here in this world, including Science et al is only Real till Real Knowledge dawns.

    Then it becomes Illusory.

    So the word is real and Unreal or Illusion , both at the same time.

    Hinduism speaks of fourteen levels of existence.

    Eleven have been proved theoretically by Quantum Physics.

    Please read my post filed under Indian Philosophy, Hinduism, Time and Astrophysics Physics.

    Scroll down for Videos.

    Now Physicists have come with the same conclusion from a different angle.

    ‘Ekam Sath, Vipra Bahuta Vidanti’ Truth is One , People speak of It in many ways’

    ”

    A team of physicists has provided some of the clearest evidence yet that our Universe could be just one big projection.

    In 1997, theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena proposed that an audacious model of the Universe in which gravity arises from infinitesimally thin, vibrating strings could be reinterpreted in terms of well-established physics. The mathematically intricate world of strings, which exist in nine dimensions of space plus one of time, would be merely a hologram: the real action would play out in a simpler, flatter cosmos where there is no gravity.

    Maldacena’s idea thrilled physicists because it offered a way to put the popular but still unproven theory of strings on solid footing — and because it solved apparent inconsistencies between quantum physics and Einstein’s theory of gravity. It provided physicists with a mathematical Rosetta stone, a ‘duality’, that allowed them to translate back and forth between the two languages, and solve problems in one model that seemed intractable in the other and vice versa. But although the validity of Maldacena’s ideas has pretty much been taken for granted ever since, a rigorous proof has been elusive.

    In two papers posted on the arXiv repository, Yoshifumi Hyakutake of Ibaraki University in Japan and his colleagues now provide, if not an actual proof, at least compelling evidence that Maldacena’s conjecture is true.

    In one paper, Hyakutake computes the internal energy of a black hole, the position of its event horizon (the boundary between the black hole and the rest of the Universe), its entropy and other properties based on the predictions of string theory as well as the effects of so-called virtual particles that continuously pop into and out of existence. In the other, he and his collaborators calculate the internal energy of the corresponding lower-dimensional cosmos with no gravity. The two computer calculations match.

    “It seems to be a correct computation,” says Maldacena, who is now at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and who did not contribute to the team’s work.”

     

    Source:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/11/universe-hologram-physicists_n_4428359.html

    Read another article at the Link below.

    http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/09/is-our-universe-a-hologram-in-1982-a-litttle-known-but-epic-event-occured-at-the-university-of-paris.html