Tag: Hinduism

  • Move your phantom limbs Mentally!-Fox News.

    Indian philosophy recognizes mind as an organ like other organs, but ranked Superior.Sri Krishna declares in the Bhagavad Gita-“I am Mind among organs”
    Activity of the brain is mind;activity of the mind is intellect and Chitta is on a higher plane.
    By controlling and channelizing Chitta any thing is possible(incidentally, nothing is Super natural according to Indian Philosophy,everything is Natural).
    Yoga is built around this concept.We are what we think;we think because of what we eat.

    Story:
    “Phantom” pain is like a ghost in the body — but it’s anything but imaginary. People who have had an arm or leg amputated can often still feel sensations of the missing limb, even though it’s no longer there. These sensations can be painful, and scientists are always looking for new ways to help relieve this phantom pain for amputees. Treatment often involves using mirrors to visually trick the person’s brain. The thinking is that, if a person can “see” his own body in a new way, his brain may stop sending pain messages.

    In a new study, a team of neuroscientists have made another surprising discovery about amputees: They can be taught to mentally move their missing limbs in ways that are impossible in the real, physical world. It’s impossible for a person to bend his wrist down and then twist his hand around in a full circle.

    Seven people who had had their arms amputated above the elbow participated in the experiment. After extensive mental training, four of the seven were able to feel the sensation of this impossible act, and describe it in detail.

    “It is very surprising that anybody — amputees or not — can learn impossible movements just by thinking about it,” Henrik Ehrsson of the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, told Science News. Ehrsson is a neuroscientist, which is a scientist who studies the brain and nervous system.

    Although the study itself is interesting, it may be able to help people with other kinds of mental disorders. A person with anorexia nervosa, for example, loses her appetite and/or stops eating, sometimes with fatal results. People with anorexia are usually believed to have a distorted self-image and often see themselves in an extremely negative way. But people suffering from this condition may benefit from this new research, Lorimer Moseley of the Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute in Randwick, Australia, told to Science News. Just as amputees imagined their phantom limbs could move in impossible ways, a person with anorexia may be able to change self-image by concentrating on a change to the body.

    V.S. Ramachandran is a neuroscientist and the director of the Center for Brain and Cognition at the University of California, San Diego. In his research, Ramachandran has shown that phantom pain can be reduced with the help of a mirror. The mirror is placed so that when the amputee looks in the mirror, it looks like he has both hands. As he looks at the reflection, he clenches and unclenches his one hand while—and it appears as though both hands and are clenching and unclenching. At the same time, he mentally clenches and unclenches his phantom hand. When he sees both hands unclenching, he feels pain lessen.

    Ramachandran says his mirror therapy, as well as the new research, show that much is left to learn about how the brain perceives the body. “Body image turns out to be extraordinarily plastic,” Ramachandran told Science News. “We think of ourselves as stable people with a stable body image — but we can inhabit a body that cannot exist in the physical world.”

    http://sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/49687/title/FOR_KIDS_New_twists_for_phantom_limbs

  • Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?

    There is no such thing as Blind Faith.There is nothing like Rational Faith and Blind Faith.
    Faith is what you experience and not what you think.
    You feel the presence of Love,God, not think of them.
    Faith is of the heart not of the Head.
    Couple of points.
    1.Before trying to dissect the concept of GOD and trying to rationalise either to prove or disprove,first define ‘Mind’-then define thoughts.So far no body has defined mind but still use the term frequently as if it is the highest authority.
    Mind is not seen ,heard,smelt,felt,or tasted( the five senses);yet you say it exists.One might say it is because of the results,namely coordination of sense organs.This again is an assumption and not proven.
    You may also map the brain ,scan it, but still you can not say what the mind is.Can you declare that mind is not operative when brain is in coma?You do no know,that is the answer.
    2.How does one explain consciousness?Psychologists have a funny term’Unconscious’.If you are not conscious how come you know it?Again the result of consciousness is seen in day to day life.That is, you infer.
    Are all inferences correct?
    In logic, you take a particular instance,refer it to general statement,then arrive at a final statement.To explain;
    All men are mortal.
    X is a Man.
    Therefore X is mortal.
    Seems correct-Is it ?
    Before saying all men are mortal you should have verified all men living,dead and those who are yet to be born, know that those who are born die and then say all are mortal.
    Is this the case?
    We have not verified each case and also it is impossible to check each case.
    We do what we call an inductive leap and say and all are mortal.
    When your basic assumption itself is open to question/is wrong ,what about your conclusions?
    Nor are the senses reliable.
    You dip your hand in warm water and then keep it in cold water.Is the water cold
    immediately?
    If I am going to believe only what I am going to perceive by myself I will be a doodering idiot.I have not been to moon.I have heard of it.I believe it.What if people have have lied?
    Testimony is also open to question.
    If I were to follow what others tell me , then who has informed the first person on earth a thing is what it is?For example,I call rose a rose because it has been named thus.Who has informed the first human being thus?
    Again what is a thing we see or hear?
    I call rose a rose,because of certain qualities.say clolor,smell.If any thing smeels like rose shal I call it a rose.No.It may be a perfume.If it is because of color, there are many roses of the same color, but still we call a rose a rose.You strip a thing of its qualities;what does remain?
    Take a Man.Can you tell me what is common between yourself at 3 yrs and you at present and in between?
    I am totally different from what I was at various stages of my life when compared my present state.My physical details have changed,out look has changed.Yet I call myself the same.
    What is it by which I call ‘I’?
    These things call for introspection by the individual and no amount of writing shall solve the issue.
    Introspect and you shall know what you are.
    Both Theism and Atheism are set of principles that appeal to different groups.Let each believe what they want.
    What you want is not in Books;it is within you.
    Find it, for when you are about to die all this dissertations will be of no use, for that matter when you lie naked on the surgeon’s table for a procedure, these things will not help.
    Find the Truth in you.
    (By writing some controversial books ,people make money, Period.

    Story:
    A new book points out that the ancient Christians — and even early Americans — did not share the blind faith of today’s fundamentalists.
    If you open Karen Armstrong’s new book, The Case for God, expecting to find a list of mysterious cures, scientific curiosities, or certified miracles all pointing toward the physical presence of a divine influence in the world, you will be sorely disappointed. Armstrong has no interest in, and is in fact completely antithetical to, trying to prove God’s existence. Despite this, her book is positioned — both in marketing and from its opening pages — as a direct challenge to books like Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion, Sam Harris’ Letter to a Christian Nation, and Christopher Hitchens’ God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. How can you make a defense of God if you’ve no interest in the existence of God? Quite well, actually, and if you do it as sharply as Armstrong, you can make hundreds of pages of what is basically theological analysis both entertaining and informative.

    Armstrong argues for an idea very similar to the “non-overlapping magisteria” that were put forward by evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould (and in fact, Gould gets several nice mentions in The Case for God). She refers frequently to the idea that, in the past, people tended to break arguments into two groups for which she uses the Greek terms logos and mythos. Logos reflects practical, immediate reasoning — how do we build that aqueduct, what can we make from this wood, which crop would grow best in that field? Mythos is more aimed at the why — what does it mean that my friend has died, how can I recapture the joy I felt in a moment of pure experience, how can I find meaning and peace among the world’s noise and violence? This sort of approach could easily fall into a gooey cheer for “being spiritual,” but Armstrong is not talking about having a nice little breathing session now and then. She focuses on the 3000 year history of monotheism and the great effort that was put into building flexible, thoughtful religions, on how those religions continue to have a meaningful role in the life of millions, and how the recent history of those religions has led to unfortunate developments that are unique over those three millennia.

    http://www.alternet.org/story/143844/is_blind_faith_in_god_and_the_bible_a_modern_invention?page=entire

  • Is too much sleep making you tired?

    Too much sleeping causes not only tiredness,but it makes one duller,reduces the power of concentration,discrimination,inattentiveness,anxiety prone.(Hindu Smritis).One also becomes emotionally unstable.Sleep on the other hand has no standard time duration for all individuals.Some may do with six hours ,others may need 8 hours.In excess of eight hours is generally not good excepting for those who are convalescing and women who arepregnant(in this case not at a stretch, but taken at different times as cat naps)Incidentally cat naps of about 15 minutes a day is very refreshing.
    Ideally one should go to bed not later than 3 hours after sundown and get up at the crack of dawn.Sleeping during day time is to be strictly avoided.Sleeping on the left side is good for the heart, so is taking a warm drink(not liquor,not coffee/tea).One should not sleep naked-minimum clothing which is not tight is to be worn; nor in open air,in an open building, in a place with out roof or a under a tree.(Source-Smriti)
    Tailpiece :If you want to wake up at a particular time during night,no alarm is needed,take a glass of water reminding yourself the time you want to wake up.Most effective.Try.
    Story:
    (CNN) — Instead of feeling crisp and refreshed, Jesse Wu wakes up sluggish after 12 hours of sleep.

    “If I sleep the right amount, I feel really good,” said the 25-year-old who lives in a suburb of Chicago, Illinois. “If I sleep too long, I feel groggy throughout the whole day.”

    Like Wu, some feel exhausted after long hours of rest.

    “Many people will tell you, they sleep a little worse when they sleep a long time on weekends,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, co-director of Scripps Clinic Sleep Center in La Jolla, California. “Too much long sleep on weekends does not seem to make people feel better.” But he acknowledged that the reasons haven’t been determined
    http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/10/30/oversleeping.health.effects/index.html

  • Message for God.

    .”Lead us from Untruth to Truth;Lead us from Darkness to Light;Lead us from Death to Immortality.Lead us to be good human beings.Lead us to be worthy of you.”

  • Theory of Relativity visualized.

    Please visit the linked site.
    Also read my blog on this’Time-non-linear Theory’

    http://www.spacetimetravel.org/Story:
    Relativity visualized
    The theory of relativity holds a certain fascination for many people. At the same time it is often regarded as very abstract and difficult to understand.

    Part of the difficulties in understanding relativity are due to the fact that relativistic effects contradict everyday experience. Motion, for example, is a familiar process and everybody “knows from experience” that it entails neither time dilation nor length contraction. A flight with half the speed of light could correct this misjudgement but is not on offer.

    A possible alternative are simulations. Images, films and virtual reality let us in a sense experience relativistic flights, gravitational collapse, compact objects and other extreme conditions