A FIR was lodged against Rapper Honey Singh by an IPS Officer for his obscene Lyric content of hid songs.
Rapper Honey Singh has been a chart-topper this year, and he had two songs on YouTube’s list of top 10 most-popular videos of 2012 for India.
Honey Singh’s two songs are featured among top ten Popular Videos on YouTube.
An Online Petition has also been on against him for the ‘porn and misogynistic content ‘ of his lyric.
” “These pornographic lyrics are unacceptable and it is because of women hating (sic) sentiments like these that men think that it’s fine to do what they did on that bus, that December night in Delhi. Let’s put a stop to these subversive lyrics that infiltrate the minds of people who don’t know better and who then justify to themselves the rightness of a crime that harms another human being, sometimes so severely that they lose their lives.”
Honey Singh Dancing.
“Choot”
Aja teri choot maroon
Tere sir se chudney ka bhoot utaroon
Choodney key baad tujhe jutey maroon
Tere mooh main apna lora dey key mooth maroon (yeah)
Kar doon teri fuddi kharab
Merey jesa koi nahin meree bhudi kharab
Terey baad tere post
Bas yahi kaam kaaj mera
Kar doon ga khush tujhe
Luraa ley key naach mera……
Choda hoga tujh ko hazaroon ney
Mehngay mehngay kamroon mein
Lambi caroon mein
Bollywood key baray baray sitroon ney
Per merey lund jeesa dum naa bicharoon mein
Mein karoon din raat ek
Guzar merey saath ek raat …dekh
Terey jesey maine toree ek raat mein…
Aazma key dekh ley, dum kitni hai baat mein”
His programme on New Year’s Eve in Gurgaon. was canceled.
Honey Singh denied his penning these lyrics.
“Fearing for his life, in a startling revelation, Honey Singh claims the offensive song is not his at all.
“I swear on my music. I’ve neither written nor sung those offensive songs. I’d never dream of singing a song in praise of rape,” he says. “The thought is nauseating to me. I’d rather give up singing than attain popularity in such cheap and cheesy ways.”
Singh claims the song was released on the Internet by an imposter: “I’ve sent notices to YouTube and other Web sites which have uploaded the offensive number. I am shocked that such a song could even be believed to be mine.”
“I come from a family where women are respected and I’d never disrespect women by espousing rape,” he says.'(rediff.com)
Linking this to the incidence of the Gang rape in Delhi is sheer non sense.
People should not be carried away by emotions, trying to find a reason everywhere for th Delhi gang rape.
While it is indeed objectionable and perverse to sing these songs, the fact is this form has always been there right from the earliest societies.
We have Limericks,Sexual ballads,in Folk songs.
I am not sure how many know of this.
In fact some of the Tamil Folk songs are so vulgar sometimes you start hating Sex!
This and Strip tease, Belly dancing,cabarets ,nauch walis are here to stay.
Do you know wrote the following lines?
“Cock
One can hardly miss the vulgarity of “Pistol’s cock is up,/And flashing fire will follow” (Henry V, II.i.52-53;also see PISTOL). Outside such double entendres, cock was also a substitute for the even more shocking word “God,” as in “By Cock” (Hamlet, IV.v.61) and “Cock’s passion” (Shrew IV.i.118)
Erection
“They mistook their erection,” notes Mistress Quickly, meaning to say “directions.” Falstaff responds, “So did I mine, to build upon a foolish woman’s promise” (Wives, III.v.39-42)
Finger
The term “fingering” is more obviously bawdy in Cymbeline, when Cloten the clownish gallant hires musicians to help “penetrate” his resistant love object, Imogen. “Come on, tune. If you can penetrate her with your fingering, so; we’ll try with tongue too” (II.iii.14-15)
Plough
“Royal wench!” marvels Agrippa; “She [Cleopatra] made great ceasar lay his sword to bed;/ He ploughed her, and she cropp’d[gave birth]” (Antony, II.ii,227-29). “And if she [chaste Marina] were a thornier piece of ground than she is,” the pimp Boult proposes, “she shall be plough’d” (pericles, IV.vi.144-45).
Privates, Secret Parts
Genitalia. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern tell Hamlet they are neither sad nor over-happy — “on Fortune’s cap,” says Guildenstern, “we are not the very button.” “Nor the soles of her shoe?” asks Hamlet; “Neither, my lord,” Rosencrantz replies. “Then,” the prince continues, “you live about her waist, or in the middle of her favors?” “Faith,” jests Guildenstern, “her privates we.” Hamelet: “In the sweet parts of Fortune? O, most true, she is a strumpet [whore]” (HAmlet, II.ii228-36).”
Congress dismissed that the accusation of Kejriwal as frivolous and Robert Vadra is a Private Individual and his privacy is to be respected.
When SG’s Family treats India as their property ,like Karunaidhi says’ Kazhagam(Party,DMK, is a family,it is fine.
But Vadra’s company Skylight is a legal entity and has to answer as it is a Registered Company (is it?)
Kejriwal on Robert Vadra.
‘In Balance sheet of 2008-9 ending 31st March 2009, there is an entry for a 3.5 acre plot of land in Manesar, Haryana. It was ostensibly bought in this financial year.
The Value of this plot is shown as Rs 15.38 crores (cost price)
DLF gave an advance of Rs 50 crore (Rs 500 million) to Skylight Hospitality against a piece of land at Sikohpur village, Gurgaon, in 2008-09, the company said. DLF bought the land for Rs 58 crore (Rs 580 million), according to its statement. Subsequently, Skylight Group of companies offered DLF an opportunity to purchase a large land parcel in Faridabad in 2008-09, and DLF agreed to advance Rs 15 crore (Rs 150 million) in instalments.
“After concluding that, the said land had certain legal infirmities, we decided against its purchase. Accordingly on DLF’s request, the Skylight group refunded the advance of Rs 15 crore in totality,” said DLF in its statement.
Therefore, Sale Price = Rs 58 crores against a Cost Price of Rs 15.38 crores. So profit from the said plot of land to Robert Vadra comes to a cool Rs. 42.62 crores
As per the Indian Income Tax, if a land is kept for less than 3 years before sale, it is liable forShort Term Capital Gains Tax(33 percent – 30 percent tax + 10 percent surcharge on tax, plus cess) and if it is kept for over 3 years then the Long Capital Gains Tax is incurred (which is 20%).
Since this land was bought in 2008-09 (as per Skylight’s Balance Sheet) and sold (as per DLF statement) in 2008-09; it clearly should have attracted Short Term Capital Gains Tax. Which works out to Rs 14.1 crores (33% on Rs 42.62 crores).
All good, but there is no discussion of the land having been conveyanced anywhere. Unless the Title Deed is transferred, can the land be deemed having been sold? Income Tax Act’s Section 2(47) says this:
“(v) any transaction involving the allowing of the possession of any immovable property to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882) ; or
“(vi) any transaction (whether by way of becoming a member of, or acquiring shares in, a cooperative society, company or other association of persons or by way of any agreement or any arrangement or in any other manner whatsoever) which has the effect of transferring, or enabling the enjoyment of, any immovable property (the italics are mine).”
Which means if the other party is “enjoying the benefits” of the land, it is deemed as sale.
Firspost article cites another interesting point and a case law:
Also DLF gave Sky Light Hospitality a total sum of Rs 50 crore given as advance in installments against the purchase consideration. The judicial interpretations made by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in the Chatrabhuj Kapadiavs CIT (2003)case and the Authority of Advance Ruling, New Delhi, in 2007 (AAR No 724 of 2006), have held that the receipt of a substantial considerationand handing over possession amounts to transfer liable to capital gains tax…..
Firstpost article suggests that there is no such evidence from the financial statements of Skylight Hospitality:
If the tax of Rs 14.08 crore was paid it would be visible as advance tax on the asset side of the balance-sheet. The advance tax in the balance-sheet is at Rs 6.93 lakh. If the tax had not been paid it should have been visible on the liability side under the head ‘provision for tax’. The provision for income tax is Rs 11.41 lakh. So the tax probably wasn’t paid in the financial year 2009-2010.
What about the balance-sheet as on 31 March 2011? The provision for income tax is Rs 24.57 lakh. I couldn’t find the exact number for the advance tax paid. But the total amount of loans and advances under the head current assets stood at around Rs 32.1 lakh, which is a lot lesser than Rs 14.08 crore. So there is no question of the tax having been paid in the financial year 2010-2011 either.
The same stands true for the balance-sheet as on 31 March 2009. The advance tax is at Rs 69,257. And the provision for income tax is at Rs 75,000. So the income tax wasn’t paid in the financial year 2008-2009.
Has Vadra’s company Skylight then, Evaded the Taxes worth Rs 14.1 crores? ”
The arrest , detention and subsequent release of 11 women on suspicion of prostitution has evoked strong protests.
The released women have sued for damage of Rs. One crore for wrongful detention.
By way of explanation the Commissioner Dhobe stated that the ‘Birth day party’ was a cover for prostitution.
The males were charged Rs. 3000 as entry fee while the it was free for women.
The times of India news report( 13 June 2012 page 11 Bangalore Edition) bemoans that the Free Admission for females is a marketing strategy!
I know of hotels (Five Star) fixing up entry fee for males and free entry to women for special occasions like New Year and for fixed programmes in the year.
Pray tell me why this concern?
In some cases, the courtesy is extended only to Single females.
I know a Five Star Hotel in the heart of Chennai conducts a Male Cabaret Show on fixed days and only Ladies are allowed.
This is also a marketing strategy?
For what?
The Hotel Industry is helping women to emancipate themselves?
Every one knows what happens in these parties.
If you mix with people of dubious character , you will be called as one.
How do you expect the Police to know who is a prostitute?
By visiting them personally in each case?
Circumstantial evidence, it is called.
Another grouse is that working women want to’ relax”in a bar!
Very well
Look at what happens to t women in a pub or near about?
“GURGAON: In yet another assault on a woman near a pub in Gurgaon, a 23-year-old mother was allegedly gangraped by seven men after being abducted from outside the Sahara Mall on M G Road at 2.30 am on Monday.
GURGAON: The curb on stag entry at pubs and night clubs in Gurgaon has spawned a new culture, which has served to corrupt more than cleanse. There are scores of women escorts hanging around pubs, waiting to help a ‘single’ man gain entry in return for big money. And the business is booming with police turning a blind eye.
The escorts ensure easy entry for single men who pay them anywhere between Rs 500 to Rs 5,000 depending on the services offered. They share the dance floor and even share a drink with their clients.
How is it that an organisation with systems has not been able to notice a false product being distributed ,deposits received, receipts issued and accounted for?
Do people not check transaction details against receipts issued?
Or these people have a sophisticated Software which does not need to check the receipts issued against inflow?
Even if a receipt book was maintained by the accused,is it possible to keep the same safely over a long period of time?
Again did not the depositors visit the bank even once?
How is it they have not blurted out the ‘Scheme’ to the bank staff or their friends about their wonderful investment?
One thing is sure-we need not bother about fine prints(conditions apply);
The normal document may not also be original.
Another point is , because of IVRS ( automatic recording)system, one hardly finds a human being to answer you.( by the way how is it that none of the investors made an even a casual inquiry at the bank?)
This makes all the more easy for fraudsters who know Software to manipulate records.
NEW DELHI: Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee has ruled out any systemic failure in the muti-crore fraud at Citibank and said that precautions are being taken to ensure that such cases are not repeated.
“There are regulations and all other precautions are being taken. But if there is an individual misdemeanor, that has to be acted on. Law will take its own course of action,” Mukherjee told reporters.
The alleged fraud was detected at Citibank’s Gurgaon branch. An FIR for cheating and forgery against a bank employee and three others was lodged on Tuesday and 18 accounts, with about Rs4 crore deposits, were frozen subsequently.
The fraud is said to be a handiwork of Shiv Raj Puri, a relationship manager at the branch, who allegedly sold investment products to high networth clients claiming that they would generate unusually high returns. He also allegedly routed the fund garnered from HNI customers to stock market through brokerage firms like Religare Securities.
Citibank India spokesperson said, “We recently initiated an investigation into a certain set of suspicious transactions based on documents forged by an employee involving a few accounts in our Gurgaon branch,” the spokesperson said. “Identified suspicious transactions have been isolated and we are providing full assistance to the authorities in their investigations.”
New Delhi: A huge banking fraud has been uncovered at the Gurgaon branch of Citibank that saw a bank employee fraudulently diverting an estimated Rs.400 crore from 20 accounts of high-networth clients. Citibank has already lodged an FIR with the police and begun internal investigation into the fraud.
“We recently initiated an investigation into a certain set of suspicious transactions based on documents forged by an employee involving a few accounts in our Gurgaon branch,” a Citi India spokesperson said in a statement on Tuesday. According to sources, an employee, Shivaraj Puri, used to seek deposits from high-networth customers in lucrative schemes. However, he used to transfer the funds to some other accounts.
Funds amounting to Rs.400 crore belonging to about 20 customers, according to sources, were transferred to fictitious accounts.
The employee involved is suspected of selling investment products to clients claiming that these would generate unusually high returns.
It has been alleged that the employee also showed a forged notification of market regulator SEBI for garnering funds from customers.
The flagship branch that Citibank opened in New York’s Union Square today is a bit different from banks in its other locations.
Instead of picking up a paper brochure, patrons can use one of the six interactive sales walls with touchscreen capabilities to learn more about bank services. Instead of using deposit envelopes, they can use enhanced-image ATMs to deposit checks without them. And instead of waiting for business hours to speak with a customer service representative, customers can use a 24/7 video chat station in the ATM lobby.
The digital components of the 9,700-square-foot branch are based on technologies pioneered by Citibanks in Hong Kong and Singapore.
Some features of the new bank seem more suited for a cafe or a airport lounge than a bank. Customers can access free Wi-Fi (in a private seating lounge if they are Citigold customers), and “media walls” display news, weather, and information about Citibank. Atmosphere Proximity, Citi’s digital agency, also designed a chip with the bank’s social media team that accesses a special Foursquare feed. Whenever a certain amount of people check in to the branch, an “internal marketing screen” shows which users are inside the branch at that very moment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.