Tag: Genocide

  • Remaining impartial in the Middle East .

    Notwithstanding syrupy prose ,what comes out is the fact that Jews are still talking about times when people were supposed have occupied places as per their mythologies.By the same yardstick, Hindu mythologies declare the land of Hindus encompassed the whole globe.Shall Hindus take a claim for the whole world?
    People have been migrating and living together notwithstanding religious texts for ages in all parts of the world.Only after the concealed desire of the Jews to possess what has been said in their religion, got intensified after genocide of Jews by Hitler. Jews should, better than any body else what it is to be stateless.Why ,driven by victim hood,should one deny the land where the Palestinians have been living?It is not as though Jews are being driven out.Palestinians also should be provided land.
    But the Jews seem to bent on denying Palestinians space more than acquiring space for Jews themselves.
    Very sad.
    Story:
    As Tim Franks finishes his spell as the BBC’s Middle East correspondent, he explains how his own background made it inevitable that some people would make certain assumptions.
    Tim Franks reporting from the Gaza-Israel border
    Tim Franks has been BBC Middle East correspondent since March 2007

    First an admission: I am a Jew, and a journalist.

    And now an apology: I hate the solipsistic writing I am about to be guilty of, where the journalist puts himself at the centre of the story.

    But let me try to explain.

    The reason for the admission is that my dual identity – Jew and journalist – has not just been a matter for me these past three-and-a- half years. From the start, it was of apparently burning import for a good number of friends, acquaintances and people whom I had never met.

    That it was so, perhaps illuminates one small corner of the cloud of smog that envelops the Middle East.

    There were those Jews from the synagogue in my previous posting, Brussels, who heard about my new job, clapped me on the back and said, “Thank goodness, at last you’ll be able to put our side of the story.”

    The Middle East has become occluded by prejudice, prejudice in its literal sense of pre-judgement

    There was the non-Jewish classmate from school – someone I had not exchanged a word with for 20 years – who emailed me out of the blue to commiserate over how difficult it would be for me in my new job not to have divided loyalties, to Judaism and to journalism.

    And there was the non-Jewish friend of the family who declared, to one of my relatives, that my appointment had come about because of the pressure the previous Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, had applied to the director-general of the BBC.

    Refugees

    And there are many who believe that, as a journalist, I am also guilty before I have broadcast a word: guilty of being in hock to the all-powerful Jewish lobby, guilty of being in thrall to the Palestinian culture of victimhood, guilty of stirring over-heated controversy out of every spit and whistle in this corner of western Asia.
    Balata refugee camp
    Balata is the largest refugee camp in the West Bank

    The Middle East has become occluded by prejudice, prejudice in its literal sense of pre-judgement.

    Too many people have unshakeable views of others. The label does not help identify the person. It becomes the person.

    It can be a rather comforting deception.

    Take the radioactive issue of refugees.

    The West Bank’s largest refugee camp is Balata – home to more than 30,000 Palestinians, wedged into concrete apartment blocks barely a shoulder-width apart.

    Ask the young boys there – boys who are third, even fourth generation refugees, born in this camp – where they come from and, without missing a beat, they will still say Haifa or Jaffa or other cities deep within Israel, places that certainly they and probably their parents have never visited.

    And so it was a shock to me recently when, in a hotel room in Amman, the Palestinians’ chief negotiator, Saeb Erekat, told me that the Israelis had to understand that part of any final deal involving the establishment of a Palestinian state would have to include the return of some Palestinian refugees to Israel.

    Some. Not all, as the usual theology demands.

    Jewish settlements

    There are Israelis willing to punch holes in the wall of myths.

    Jeremy is a British Jew who made aliyah (emigrated to Israel) 20 years ago.

    Construction work at a Jewish settlement
    More than 430,000 Jewish settlers live in the West Bank

    He, his wife and three daughters live in a small apartment in Jerusalem. It is not an easy or financially cushy life but, as a religiously observant Jew and committed Zionist, there is nowhere he would rather be.

    Which is not to say that he is not speaking with ever thicker tones of despair about his new home country.

    Take the Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

    Ideologically committed Jewish settlers regard this land, replete as it is with biblical references, as more precious than Tel Aviv or other cities within the Green Line, within what’s considered to be Israel proper.

    Jeremy says that this veneration of the land has become “idolatry.” Few insults, between Jews, over the last 5,000 years, have been more wounding.

    ‘Pogrom’

    A more recent word was used in the wake of an eviction of a houseful of Jewish settlers in the West Bank city of Hebron.

    Map of Israel and the Occupied Territories

    Despite doom-laden predictions, the Israeli police and army managed quite easily to extract the Jews, whom the Israeli Supreme Court had ruled were living illegally in the building.

    But then Jewish rioters wreaked their vengeance on Palestinians living in the valley below the house.

    I crouched by an outside wall, while rocks and firebombs were thrown at the homes, inside which terrified families had barricaded themselves.

    Leaning over the wall, on the far side of the valley, were scores of residents of the adjoining settlement of Kiryat Arba.

    They appeared, passively, to be watching the mayhem unfold.

    The next day, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz called the previous evening’s riot a “pogrom”, the word coined in the 19th Century to describe the systematic, blood-soaked, anti-Jewish rioting in Russia.

    Psychological barriers

    The term was shocking, poignant and appropriate.

    I guess, and again forgive the solipsism, but some may want to know my response to the question that I, as a BBC journalist, could never – and never wanted to – answer: namely, what did that, and a million other incidents, make me, a Jew, feel about the Jewish state?

    Probably unfairly… I resented the fact that none of them appeared to be approaching each rousing song or traditional prayer in any different way on this specific day

    On one level, it was simple.

    That night of rioting was ghastly. It reflected a deep reservoir of shamefulness and dysfunction.

    My paternal grandparents had, as children, early last century, left Lithuania and Russia for the sanctuary of Britain.

    They and their families would have known all about the particular terror of pogroms.

    The following evening, I was in my synagogue in Jerusalem for the Friday night service that brings in Shabbat (sabbath).

    It is the most determinedly happy point of the Jewish week, and the synagogue to which I have belonged the past three years makes a point of filling the hour and a quarter with – in liturgical terms – some cracking tunes.

    By about half-way through, I have usually overcome my British and hazily agnostic reserve and am joining in. But on this Friday, I could not escape feeling flat and depressed.

    Probably unfairly – given the unusually high sensitivity among much of this congregation to what is happening on occupied territory – I resented the fact that none of them appeared to be approaching each rousing song or traditional prayer in any different way on this specific day.

    In a way, it was almost adolescent: why can’t they see the blackness too?

    In another, it reflected the psychological barriers Israelis have erected at the same time as the separation barrier along the West Bank: it puts what is happening over there – over the other side of the Green Line – out of mind.

    It is, as one Israeli friend acidly put it, “a peace dividend, without the peace”.

    I do not believe I had covered the story for radio or TV any differently because I was a Jew.

    But was I feeling more bleak the following day because this was violence perpetrated by Jews? Well, perhaps.

    Ineluctable truths

    Against that, and many other similar incidents, there were also countless moments of celebration and nurture, which felt particular because of where they were and the company they kept.

    Ploughing on Kibbutz Degania Bet in 1945 in what was then the British Mandate of Palestine
    The first kibbutz was founded in 1910

    I was never the sort of Jew who went weak-kneed when close to the Western Wall and, indeed, from my first visit to Israel as a teenager, I rather kicked against the assumption that I would be transported on waves of epiphany.

    But when I was lucky enough to spend eve of festival meals in the homes of Jewish friends in Jerusalem, were they special because of the people or because of the locale?

    It seems futile to try to separate, given that these were Jews who had chosen to live in Jerusalem.

    The same goes for the kibbutz, the rural collective farm, where one of my favourite artists had resided for more than 50 years, and where the life remained a deeply unfashionable paean to a socialist idyll, which in turn had been a foundation of the original Zionist dream.

    In other words, it is important to contextualise.

    Of course it is, it is what we, as journalists, should always aim to do.

    But it is what you absolutely cannot do if you trade in apparently ineluctable truths about the nature of Israelis or Jews or Palestinians or Arabs or Muslims: then the circle becomes sterile and self-defeating.

    ‘Another code’

    So, to return at long last to what I, as a Jew, feel about the Jewish state. Well, it is what I, as a journalist, feel about the Jewish state: that it’s there.

    Just as the stateless Palestinians are there.

    Yes, this is the Middle East but it is not the Middle Ages

    Neither is going to cease being without a blood-soaked cataclysm. No competing narrative is going to vanquish the other. We need to move on.

    There are not many – maybe not any – places such as this land.

    Places where there have been 4,000 years of conflict. Where it is almost impossible to plant your foot on the historical turf and say “Aha! On this we can agree.”

    In what city in the world, other than Jerusalem, has control swung 11 times between religions?

    So yes, this place is unique.

    But does that mean it demands different rules?

    One of the most telling comments I heard was uttered on a hilltop settlement by Shoshanna Shilo.

    She was a grandmother, with twinkling eyes, whom I had first met as she was carried away, rigid with fury, by four Israeli military policemen, from an impromptu protest in the West Bank.

    I met her again, a few weeks later, at her own settlement.

    It wasn’t, she said, just that this land which the rest of the world wants for a Palestinian state belongs to the Jews. It was also what she saw as the delusion that the other side wants peace.

    “This is the Middle East,” she told me. “It’s not Europe. We live,” she said, “by another code.”

    Well, yes, it is the Middle East but, no, it is not the Middle Ages.

    These days, we should all try to live by a different code. Shouldn’t we?
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/8728939.stm

  • Sri Lanka execution video authentic – UN envoy

    Horrendous.Humanity must hang its head in shame over this for its insensitivity.Weather cock politicians in Tamil Nadu who cash in on SriLankan Tamils misery, posing as Saviors of Tamils should have quit the Central Cabinet over this issue for the Delhi’s’ inaction in forcing Rajapakshe to come to heels and arrange for resettlement of Tamils and for immediate political solution for Tamils.Well, Saviors shall go to Delhi to get cabinet berths for their kin and their kin dine with Rajapakshe and accept gifts from him smiling.Are you not ashamed as a human being?SriLankan Tamils! Do not trust these vultures.As a world wide community go to UN direct ,seek Obama’s help.
    Video apparently showing extra-judicial killings by Sri Lankan troops is genuine, a UN envoy has said.
    UN special rapporteur Philip Alston said three independent experts had confirmed the video was authentic, renewing calls for a war crime inquiry.
    The footage – which Sri Lanka says is fabricated – shows a man dressed as a soldier shooting a man in the head.
    It was allegedly filmed in January during the final stages of the bloody conflict with Tamil Tigers rebels.
    The government in Colombo said it concluded the video was fake after conducting its own investigation.
    Bodies on ground
    Mr Alston, the UN special rapporteur on extra-judicial killings, said there was no reason to assume the footage was fake.
    He said he based his conclusion on reports by independent investigators – with experience in forensics and firearms – who had examined the video.
    Mr Alston also called on the Sri Lankan government to hold an independent inquiry into possible war crimes committed by both sides of the conflict.
    It is not clear where the footage, which also shows other bodies on the ground, was taken.
    The video was provided to the BBC and other media organisations by a group called Journalists for Democracy in Sri Lanka, which said it showed “the reality of the behaviour of the government forces during the war”.
    Government troops finally defeated the Tamil Tigers (LTTE) last May after months of fierce fighting.
    Journalists for Democracy in Sri Lanka said the video had been taken in January 2009.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8446849.stm

  • UN presses Sri Lanka over Tamil Tiger killings

    If the Government says ‘Fonseka’ betrayed the country’, it is an admission of guilt.
    While the world has been paying its attention only to Osama,Pakistan,North Korea and Climate Change,Sri Lanka has quietly executed Genocide of Tamils.
    Would the world have kept quiet if a tragedy of this magnitude takes place in in Europe?
    Where are the Asian countries and Human Rights Activists?
    The Sri Lankan government says the UN has asked it to explain allegations that Tamil Tiger rebel leaders were executed as they tried to surrender.
    The president’s office said it was studying the request and would take any action necessary.
    The claims – rejected by the government – were first made in a Sri Lankan newspaper and attributed to Sri Lankan ex-military chief Gen Sarath Fonseka.
    Gen Fonseka has since said his remarks were misunderstood.
    The general, a candidate in next month’s presidential election, has said he was only repeating what he had been told by journalists who had been at the scene.
    However, government officials have accused Gen Fonseka of “betrayal”.
    After the war’s bloody end in May, some diplomats alleged that the army summarily killed a group of surrendering people led by senior Tiger rebels.
    But the Sri Lankan government has said they were in fact shot by other rebel fighters.

    Gen Fonseka’s comments caused a storm of controversy
    The UN’s request came from its special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings, Philip Alston.
    The statement from President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s office said the UN “has asked the government to provide explanations with regard to the circumstances of the death of three senior LTTE [Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam] cadres and their families at the last stages of military operations to defeat the LTTE in May this year”.
    The Sri Lanka’s government crushing military victory ended the Tigers’ quarter-century war to create a separate state for ethnic minority Tamils.
    The UN estimates that up to 7,000 civilians died in the final stages of the war, although the government disputes the figures.
    Both sides were accused of human rights violations and atrocities during the long conflict.
    ‘War without witness’
    During the war’s last few months it was difficult to obtain information from the battle zone as there were no independent monitors on the ground and media access to the conflict zone was strictly restricted.
    As a result, Western nations described the conflict as a war without witness.
    Analysts say despite its repeated denials, the Sri Lankan government may find it difficult to convince the outside world, unless there is a credible independent investigation into the final stages of the conflict.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8425091.stm

  • UK ‘to block Sri Lanka bid to hold Commonwealth summit’-BBC.

    Correct.SriLanka has to be chastised for genocide, not world recognition of any sort.
    Story:
    The UK will try to block Sri Lanka’s bid to host the next Commonwealth summit over its handling of the recent war, a UK government source has said.
    Sri Lanka could not be “rewarded” for actions that had a “huge impact on civilians”, the source said.
    The current Commonwealth summit is about to get under way in Trinidad and Tobago.
    Climate change and the controversial membership bid of Rwanda are also high on the agenda.
    Rising sea levels
    The 60th anniversary Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting, being held in Port of Spain, begins on Friday.
    One of the key issues will be the choice of the 2011 venue.
    The Downing Street source said that Prime Minister Gordon Brown had “real concerns about Sri Lanka’s bid”.

    Queen Elizabeth will open the summit on Friday
    “We simply cannot be in a position where Sri Lanka – whose actions earlier this year had a huge impact on civilians, leading to thousands of displaced people without proper humanitarian access – is seen to be rewarded for its actions.”
    The UN estimates the conflict with Tamil Tiger rebels left at least 7,000 civilians dead with 150,000 people still displaced and living in camps.
    Climate change will also be high on the agenda, in the last major gathering of international leaders before the global summit on the subject starts in Copenhagen on 7 December.
    UN chief Ban Ki-moon, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Danish PM Lars Rasmussen are also attending the Port of Spain summit, to give weight to any statement on the issue.
    About half of the Commonwealth’s members are island states, many of them threatened by rising sea levels.

    About half of members, like the Maldives, are island states
    Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Patrick Manning, who is hosting the three-day meeting, said he hoped the summit could boost momentum for an agreement on carbon emissions at Copenhagen, amid “concerns about the way the negotiations were going”.
    “We hope to arrive at a political statement that can add value to the process that will culminate in Copenhagen next month… what we can do is raise our voices politically,” he said.
    The Commonwealth’s 53 nations comprise about two billion people, or one-third of the planet’s population.
    The leaders are meeting days after pledges by the US and China to limit their greenhouse gas emissions, amid concerns that the Copenhagen meeting could fail to agree substantial cuts.
    Zimbabwe issue
    The summit will also discuss Rwanda’s entry into the English-speaking club.
    The Francophone nation has been seeking membership following disagreements with France over events leading up to the 1994 genocide.
    The issue is likely to be controversial. The nation’s entry bid has received strong backing from some member states.
    However, some rights activists are angry that entry would reward a nation they say is guilty of abuses dating back to the 1994 genocide.
    BBC diplomatic correspondent James Robbins, in Trinidad, says the leaders are expected to admit Rwanda.
    He says most of the leaders apparently believe that if Rwanda is admitted, then they will be able to apply peer pressure to improve the lives of its people.
    Zimbabwe’s possible re-entry could also be brought up at the meeting.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8382014.stm

  • Court hears Radovan Karadzic’s threats of Muslim slaughter.What about Rajapakshe?

    International conscience is working to punish Radovan.Very noble indeed!
    Where is the same conscience of the world on Tamils’ Genocide in Sri Lanka:
    Why is Rajapakshe spared?
    There is ample evidence.
    World needs Sri Lanka for strategic reasons.
    Perhaps, India , China factor is working overtime?

    Story:
    They have to know that there are 20,000 armed Serbs around Sarajevo . . . it will be a black cauldron where 300,000 Muslims will die,” Dr Karadzic was recorded as saying.

    “They will disappear. That people will disappear from the face of the Earth.”
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6892144.ece?&EMC-Bltn=BFNAOB