As things stand, manufacturers give out misleading and often incorrect information.If. you do not read even that,then it is highly dangerous.
As a rule, nutrition obtained from natural resources, especially vegetarian, is best for the body.
Instead of packeted cereals, buy whole grain, wash it thoroughly, dry it and make it into a powder,sieve it and use.It is not difficult.The effort is worth your health and money.
For vitamins take vegetables and for iron,greens , leafy vegetables , dates and pure honey(one tea spoon daily in empty stomach).
Nine out of 10 mothers questioned in a British Heart Foundation (BHF) survey misunderstood the nutrition information on children’s foods.
The BHF says mothers believe claims such as “a source of calcium, iron and six vitamins” mean a product is likely to be healthy.
A “mish mash” of different food labelling styles is fuelling confusion among shoppers, it added.
But manufacturers insisted their nutritional labelling was clear.
The survey found that 76% of mothers questioned believed that “wholegrain” means the product is likely to be healthy.
However, the BHF said that – for example – Nestle’s Honey Shreddies, which claim to be wholegrain and to “keep your heart healthy and maintain a healthy body”, contain more sugar [13.6g] than a ring doughnut [9.2g] in an average serving.
Kellogg’s Coco Pops cereal and milk bars are labelled as “a source of calcium, iron and six vitamins” and 63% of mothers in the survey thought they were healthy.
The BHF said that for every 100g they were higher in saturated fat and sugar than the average chocolate cake.
The Natural Confectionery Company Jelly Snakes which are made by Cadbury’s contain more calories gram for gram than black treacle, the BHF said.
Single labelling scheme
Almost three in five respondents believed that the phrase “no artificial flavourings , no artificial colourings” indicated a healthy treat.
The questionnaire found that 84% of them wanted a single, front-of-pack food labelling scheme.
Peter Hollins, BHF chief executive, said: “Mums are having the wool pulled over their eyes by food manufacturers.
“Smoke and mirror tactics means that foods targeted at children and high in fat, salt and sugar are being disguised with partial health claims suggesting they are a healthy choice.
“Regularly eating these types of foods could have serious implications for kids’ future health.”
A single unified labelling system for food is needed because it the “mish mash” of the different systems serves only to confuse shoppers, he added.
“It’s time for food companies to stop making excuses , support one system and ensure shoppers are given ‘at a glance’ information about the foods they’re giving their kids.”
A spokesman for the Natural Confectionery Company said: “All we claim is that the sweets contain no artificial colours and flavours – which is true – so we’re not sure why this should confuse anybody.
“All nutritional information is clearly labelled on the bag.”
And a spokesman for Kellogg’s responded: “A Kellogg’s Coco Pops Cereal and Milk bar actually contains less than two teaspoons of sugar per bar and has half the calories (84) and far less fat than a chocolate bar.
“Parents understand this because we give them the information they need, through our front-of-pack labelling, to make similar comparisons.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8421326.stm
Tag: fast food
-
Couple’s son, 2, taken into care by social workers after they ‘refused to feed him junk food’
It is the Doctor who is to be prosecuted and his licence to practice canceled.
Story:
A two year-old boy was taken away by social services and put into foster care after his parents, Paul and Lisa Hessey, refused to follow doctors’ orders and feed him junk food, they have claimed.
The Derbyshire couple, both 48, had been concerned about heath of their son, Zak as he was not eating properly.
Mrs Hessey and her lorry driver husband, took their son, who weighed just 17 lbs, to Chesterfield Royal Hospital in July.The couple rejected the medical advice to feed Zak a diet of junk food, to fatten him up.
“They said we had been negative about eating. That was because they had been telling us we should feed Zak crisps, chocolate and cakes to get calories into him,” said Mrs Hessey.
“I was questioning that approach. We eat proper home-made food at our house and just have chocolate and cakes as a treat.”
Doctors said they wanted to undergo a series of tests over a fortnight and the couple, of Bolsover, near Chesterfield, agreed to have him put under observation.
But in a decision that surprised the couple, a social worker from Derbyshire County Council later said that Zak needed to go into foster care so they could “assess his needs” and determine how he ate.
The couple, who have four other children aged under 10, were told that if they challenged the decision, social services would “go straight to court” where “all your parental rights would be taken away”.
“I was absolutely devastated, I broke down in tears,” said Mrs Hessey.
“I was scared out of my wits.
“They kept saying, ‘if you love Zak and you want the best for him, then you’ll agree to this voluntarily’.”
After he was placed into foster care, they were later able to negotiate, through lawyers, to spend three hours a day with him during the following week, but only in the presence of social workers.
“I thought I was doing the right thing going to the best people for advice when Zak began to lose weight,” Mrs Hessey said.
“Instead they basically accused me of neglecting him and implied it was all my fault.”
Eventually they went to court to try to get Zak back, and after four months, he was allowed to return home after gaining less than a pound in four months.
Social services eventually said they were good and caring parents.
A spokesman for Derbyshire County Council said: “We only take a child into our care either with the consent of the parents or following very careful consideration by a court.”
A spokesman for Chesterfield Royal Hospital added: “While we understand Mr and Mrs Hessey’s distress, Zak’s welfare was paramount and we believe we acted in his best interest.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6713838/Couples-son-2-taken-into-care-by-social-workers-after-they-refused-to-feed-him-junk-food.html -
How Safe Is Your Chicken Dinner?-NYT.
A new study by Consumer Reports has found that two out of three whole broiler chickens are contaminated with illness-inducing bacteria, while certain types of organic chicken posed the lowest risk.
The researchers studied 382 whole broilers bought from more than 100 stores in 22 states and found salmonella or campylobacter bacteria on two-thirds of the birds tested. The research suggests that current safety and hygiene practices among poultry producers and handlers are inadequate and that consumers need to be vigilant at both the grocery store and at home to cook chicken well and prevent cross-contamination of countertops, hands and other foods.
Both types of bacteria are among the leading causes of food-borne illness in the United States, infecting at least 3.4 million Americans annually and sending 25,500 to hospitals. Every year about 550 people die from food-borne salmonella infections, and about 100 die after contracting campylobacter from food, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Although a few products, including Perdue-brand broilers and organic air-chilled chickens, were the safest, the magazine called chicken suppliers “a very dirty industry that needs better practices and tighter government oversight.”
Over all, campylobacter was detected in 62 percent of the chickens, while salmonella was in 14 percent. Nine percent of the birds contained both pathogens. Based on the study, a consumer has a one in three chance of buying a broiler free of both pathogens.
The cleanest birds were organic “air-chilled” broilers — 60 percent of these broilers were free of both pathogens. Typically, chickens are dunked in cold chlorinated water. In the air-chilling process, the carcasses are refrigerated and may be misted, rather than dunked, according to the magazine.
Store-brand organic chickens were entirely free of salmonella, but only 43 percent were also free of campylobacter.
Among the branded chickens, Perdue was the cleanest, with 56 percent of those testing free of both pathogens.
While both salmonella and campylobacter are known to cause intestinal distress, campylobacter can lead to meningitis, arthritis and Guillain-Barré syndrome, a severe neurological condition.
The magazine noted that its findings are a “snapshot” and no guarantee that a particular type or brand of chicken would be bacteria-free or contaminated. The magazine had the following recommendations for cleaning and preparing chicken:
At the store, place chicken in a plastic bag like those found in the produce department to keep juices from leaking on other items or your hands.
Choose chicken that is well wrapped and at the bottom of the case, where the temperature is coolest
Buy chicken last before heading to the checkout line.
Store chicken at 40 degrees or below, or freeze it if you don’t plan to cook it for two days.
Thaw frozen chicken in a refrigerator, inside its packaging and on a plate, or on a plate in a microwave oven. Never thaw it on a counter.
Cook chicken to at least 165 degrees, and use a meat thermometer to check
it.
—–
Detailed Report.(Consumer Reports)
One would think that after years of alarms about food safety—outbreaks of illness followed by renewed efforts at cleanup—a staple like chicken would be a lot safer to eat. But in our latest analysis of fresh, whole broilers bought at stores nationwide, two-thirds harbored salmonella and/or campylobacter, the leading bacterial causes of foodborne disease. That’s a modest improvement since January 2007, when we found that eight of 10 broilers harbored those pathogens. But the numbers are still far too high, especially for campylobacter. Though the government has been talking about regulating it for years, it has yet to do so. (See Lax rules, risky food.)The message is clear: Consumers still can’t let down their guard. They must cook chicken to at least 165º F and prevent raw chicken or its juices from touching any other food.
Each year, salmonella and campylobacter from chicken and other food sources infect 3.4 million Americans, send 25,500 to hospitals, and kill about 500, according to estimates by the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But the problem might be even more widespread: Many people who get sick don’t seek medical care, and many of those who do aren’t screened for foodborne infections, says Donna Rosenbaum, executive director of Safe Tables Our Priority, a national nonprofit food-safety organization. What’s more, the CDC reports that in about 20 percent of salmonella cases and 55 percent of campylobacter cases, the bugs have proved resistant to at least one antibiotic. For that reason, victims who are sick enough to need antibiotics might have to try two or more before finding one that helps.
Consumer Reports has been measuring contamination in store-bought chickens since 1998. For our latest analysis, we had an outside lab test 382 chickens bought last spring from more than 100 supermarkets, gourmet- and natural-food stores, and mass merchandisers in 22 states. We tested three top brands—Foster Farms, Perdue, and Tyson—as well as 30 nonorganic store brands, nine organic store brands, and nine organic name brands. Five of the organic brands were labeled “air-chilled” (a slaughterhouse process in which carcasses are refrigerated and may be misted, rather than dunked in cold chlorinated water).
Among our findings:
Campylobacter was in 62 percent of the chickens, salmonella was in 14 percent, and both bacteria were in 9 percent. Only 34 percent of the birds were clear of both pathogens. That’s double the percentage of clean birds we found in our 2007 report but far less than the 51 percent in our 2003 report.
Among the cleanest overall were air-chilled broilers. About 40 percent harbored one or both pathogens. Eight Bell & Evans organic broilers, which are air chilled, were free of both, but our sample was too small to determine that all Bell & Evans broilers would be.
Store-brand organic chickens had no salmonella at all, showing that it’s possible for chicken to arrive in stores without that bacterium riding along. But as our tests showed, banishing one bug doesn’t mean banishing both: 57 percent of those birds harbored campylobacter.
The cleanest name-brand chickens were Perdue’s: 56 percent were free of both pathogens. This is the first time since we began testing chicken that one major brand has fared significantly better than others across the board.
Most contaminated were Tyson and Foster Farms chickens. More than 80 percent tested positive for one or both pathogens.
Among all brands and types of broilers tested, 68 percent of the salmonella and 60 percent of the campylobacter organisms we analyzed showed resistance to one or more antibiotics.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine-archive/2010/january/food/chicken-safety/overview/chicken-safety-ov.htm -
Obesity responsible for 100,000 cancer cases annually-CNN
And fast/junk/convenience/comfort foods are the main reasons for obesity.
Avoidence of irregular eating habits, eating snacks whenver one feels like are other major causes of obesity.
Why can’t we avoid it?
Story:
CNN) — More than 100,000 cases of cancer each year are caused by excess body fat, according to a report released Thursday in Washington.Researchers with the American Institute for Cancer Research looked at seven cancers with known links to obesity and calculated actual case counts that were likely to have been caused by obesity.
Specifically, the report says that 49 percent of endometrial cancers are caused by excess body fat. That number is followed by 35 percent of esophageal cancer cases; 28 percent of pancreatic cancer cases; 24 percent of kidney cancer cases; 21 percent of gallbladder cancer cases; 17 percent of breast cancer cases; and 9 percent of colorectal cancer cases.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/11/05/obesity.cancer.link/index.html -
Jane Kennedy says no to comfort food-Courier mail.
Self explanatory.
Story:
LAST year comedian and mother of five Jane Kennedy was working long hours on the television show The Hollowmen and she stacked on 7kg with unhealthy eating and little exercise.Then at 10pm one day in July last year Kennedy had an epiphany. She realised she needed a dramatic change to her approach to food. She had come home tired and hungry and gave in to her craving for a rich, creamy risotto with garlic bread.
“Then I felt full and terrible,” she says. “It was then I thought comfort food should be called discomfort food. The term comfort food should be banned.
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26259002-5003426,00.html
You must be logged in to post a comment.