Recently a UFO Crew was held at gunpoint in the UFO Base, USA,which was not reported by The BBC, was posted in thi site along with The SUN UK and All Voices soon after the incident.
GUEST Wilbur Allen’s recent trip to Area-51 in the Nevada Desert astounds us all! The photographic evidence is proof, that being over 60,000 photos in a 2 day exploration clearly verifies the existence of Extraterrestrial life that is Visiting planet earth!
In this extraordinary interview Wilbur Allen reviews his body of work and sets out to reveal to the public the steps that he has taken that have lead him to the amazing discovery of alien craft above areas such as the WHITEHOUSE and now Area-51. Mr. Allen has the proof in these photographs and as he said “It is not what the public would expect!”
Enjoy the interview; as well Mr. Allen has been kind enough to release a couple of photos from his recent (October 13th, 2012) trip to Area-51.
The only way , as of now, is to understand sound patterns as these Alien civilisations might also be aware of the communication problem w/’they might face.
So with the limited knowledge we have we can understand (?) sound waves.
Again if mathematics as Universal as we think it should be, we might be able to decode the messages.
If the principles of Mathematics were to differ ..?
‘First French UFO files, then the British UFO files, the FBI Vault and recently the Kennedy disclosure. And now files from the prominent security agency rediscovered (never been reported in main stream media), the NSA, saying they have received alien messages, could the enlightenment period that the Mayans said would happen in 2012 actual be the revelation that we have visitors.
‘NSA had released to the public domain formerly classified UFO X-files HERE, but which had never got media attention.
This one small step, yet ‘Giant Leap For Mankind’, is best described as a ‘treasure trove’.Of the documents we have assessed so far, we are particularly interested in NSA Technical Journal Vol XIV No 1 with FOIA Case number 41472 which has been titled ‘Key To The Extraterrestrial Messages’.The document authored by a Dr. Campaigne, presented a series of 29 messages received from outer space in “Extraterrestrial Intelligence”.
The article is described as developing a key to understand these alien messages.
If the penny hasn’t dropped yet, This now unclassified document not only confirms the presence of extraterrestrials, but that the US Government has received deep space transmissions from a civilization outside our own solar system !
The following is transcribed from Page 21, Appendix:
Recently a series of radio messages was heard coming from outer space. The transmission was not continuous, but cut by pauses into pieces which could be taken as units, for they were repeated over and over again. The pauses show here as punctuation. The various combination have been represented by letters of the alphabet, so that the messages can be written down. Each message except the first is given here only once. The serial number of the messages has been supplied for each reference.
Dr. (‘lIl11lJlli/:11(‘ pn’~””/l’fl a serie« uf 29 1III’~~al!”,. {mill III1/.’r ,.pan’ in
“l-:.rtmt”rf1’strial Int”/Iipl’nn>.” NSA Teehnico! Journnl, Vol. X1. Nil. ~,
IIIJ. /11/ If. arid in Ih” Sp,~’ial Ma/hl’matil’,’ and 1′:/1.~i”,~’rill.1[ 1~,.’II· of II”,
.JfIIlrIllIl, I’ll. IIi If. ‘1’111′ rlll/owi’JI!artid~ d”‘I’I~luJl~ II k,’y til th”IlI’ n..’~~a!l”Il,
Parauraph’ numlwr.• parallel the serial numbers of the 1II1’••SlII!I’S reprinted
ill /hl’ alllll’lIdi.r bt’I,,,,’. This illdlld~s 1/111 “”II’ s,’r;,’,.–:III lII,d :11′–1111/
illl’llldl’fl ;11 /hl’pn’t’illu~ artie/,’.
AI every step in Ihe solution we make a I!UP!l~ at Jhe meaning.
!,:\’ilh’nl’I’ will quickly accumulate to verify or refute this 1!1I”~S. The
1I””sihililv of IImhil!:lIit Ill’ IWII l’lInl’il\l”nl I’oilltillnl’ i” \'(‘ry rpmnll’.
Only in Ih” last sreps. where veriticarion is thin. could this happen.
l. There nre z l I’ymblll.., in the nrder I!:i\’en bv this messaae.
:!. Ii is equivalent ttl AA, C ttl AAA, etc. That is, A= 1: B=:!: (‘ = :1:
D=-I: !’:=r,: F=6: t:=i.
:1. The s~’mhtll L mean s the twu thinll~ that (“nllo\\’ ;HI’ 1111′ s.une.
LX Y 1I11′:ml’ x =~’ .
.1. Em’h Slall’nll’nl hlIS:; s~’lI1hllls. mill ht’llinl’ with L. The ·1 symh,.ls
utter L must he clInsidered all two thinl!:l’, Io:m’h statement has a ” a”
Ihl’ third It’lll-r, which must 111′ I he sl:nl ,,(” ,h., sl’.’”nd thinl(. Is
H= IKHA: C = KAB: D= KCA’! If KBA mean” B+A. it tit”.
fi. Th”I’I’ \’”rify our l’nndll,.inllS on -I. The til’l’l 1111′:1111′ Ii = 1 ~- t:!+:\1.
tlu- las1 IIll’alls I I C! I :11 = II I :!) ‘.:1.
H. Elll’h hal’ liw symhols ‘\1’ in -I. They 111″‘\1\ I=I\I:!I: :!=I\I:II:
1= l\t:l:.!. Obviouslv :\’1 XY means x – y,
i. These translate N= I-I: N=2-:!: N=:l-:l, N stands li,r
zero. U.
8. These translate 1=011: II=Ot)l: :!sOl❗ 2=0:!1: U=OIl:!:
U= 0211; ere. OXY means the product X X Y.
9. These ,·”ril)..the conclusions III’ 8, The tirst savs that 6= 1X :?x:l,
thehll’t4X(5xGI = (·IXiil x6.
Nm«; So far we have seen two kinds IIfsymbols: digits A through li
and N. and operators L, K, M. and 0, The two digits following the
operator are the operands.
Ill. Trunslates intn ,,= H2:!: :! H21: I -~ H211: ;1- ItII: I – Itlll.
HX Y must mean X:. exponentiation. R is another binary operator,
“More than likely we will be using binary phase codes,” or sequences of 1s and 0s.
The Wow! signal is the only blip of incoming data to have stood out from the noise in the four decades that astronomers have been scouring the heavens for signs of life — an effort known as the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence, or SETI. The Big Ear radio observatory at Ohio State University picked up the intense 72-second radio transmission coming from the direction of the constellation Sagittarius. At its peak, the transmission was 30 times more powerful than ambient radiation from deep space, prompting the volunteer astronomer Jerry Ehman to scrawl “Wow!” next to the data on a computer printout, giving the signal its name.
No one knows whether the seemingly unnatural signal really was beamed toward us by aliens, and despite great effort, scientists have never managed to detect a repeat transmission from the same spot in the sky. Thirty-five years on, the Wow! signal remains a complete mystery. [7 Huge Misconceptions about Aliens]
New government files released today detail 30 years of UFO sightings
Clouds and an Unidentified Flying Object (Photo credit: scismgenie)
A policeman saw a yellow object at the FA Cup quarter final in 1999
A West Wales hotelier saw a UFO land and silver suited ‘humanoids’ get out
The London Olympics is prime time for UFOs to appear says UFO expert
Former prime minister Tony Blair received a briefing about UFOs from the Ministry of Defence because of his concerns over the disclosure of classified information on alien life-forms.
Downing Street requested the advice for the PM in 1998 as the Freedom of Information Act was being introduced, which allowed the public to obtain information on alien mysteries.
Mr Blair’s concerns were raised after he received a letter from a member of the public referring to a ‘cover-up’ and asking him to make UFO reports and other information available.
According to The Daily Telegraph, Mr Blair sought advice from the MOD for their policy on the issue.
He was told by staff at the ministry that it has ‘only a limited interest in UFO matters’ but that they ‘ remained open-minded’ about ‘extraterrestrial life forms’.
Details of the briefing emerged yesterday ahead of today’s release of files by the Government of more than 6,700 pages detailing seemingly close encounters with UFOs over the last 30 years.
Among a series of UFO sightings in the files is a policeman’s report of a mystery cluster of lights darting across the sky during an FA Cup replay between Chelsea and Manchester United.
The mounted officer’s claims to have seen the bright object hovering over Stamford Bridge in March 1999 for almost 15 seconds, slowly changing shape, were corroborated by a colleague.
The ‘credible witness report’ is one of a series investigated by the Ministry of Defence, whose top-secret files are being released in sections by the National Archives following the closure of the ministry’s UFO desk in 2009.
One confidential 1995 report by the defence official responsible for manning the desk says the presence of extra-terrestrial lifeforms is ‘possible’, although there is ‘no direct evidence’.
It also speculates on the reasons why aliens may be visiting Earth, including for military reconnaissance, scientific research, or just to enjoy the scenery and partake in some tourism.
A Smithsonian-associated museum is displaying an item it says is an ‘authentic alien artifact’ from a 1986 alleged UFO crash in Russia.
The National Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas unveiled an exhibit titled Area 51: Myth or Reality, which presents historical records of the U.S. military site that has long been called the most secret place on Earth.
Among the items is a series of small bits of debris from an incident known as the Russian Roswell.
A clear glass case displays glassy spheres that are debris from a red sphere that streaked over the Russian mining town of bits of metal in vials that streaked over the town of Dalnegorsk and crashed into Mount Izvestkovayaon January 29 1986.
The exhibits description of the debris reads: ‘Three Soviet academic centers and 11 research institutes analyzed the objects from this UFO crash. The distance between atoms is different from ordinary iron. Radar cannot be reflected from the material.’
‘Elements in the material may disappear and new ones appear after heating. One piece disappeared completely in front of four witnesses. The core of the material is composed of a substance with anti-gravitational properties.’
The debris was given to Las Vegas TV reporter George Knapp, who was the first American to visit the Russian crash site in 1990.
Located 80 miles north of Las Vegas, Area 51 was used by the military to test spy planes like the U2 and A-12 during the 1950s and 60s.
Now the exhibit examines the long-held belief that the military tested captured alien aircraft at the site as well as the remains of extraterrestrials that reportedly crashed outside of Roswell, New Mexico in 1947.
‘The CIA declassified most of the records on Area 51 up through the late ’60s and early ’70s,’ Allan Palmer, the museum’s CEO and executive director, told The Huffington Post.
‘Now we know a lot more about it and can present some of the really true stories that happened out there,’ he added. ‘And we feel a bit of an obligation to tell the larger story about the public’s perception of Area 51, which runs right into aliens, UFOs and extraterrestrial time travel, and those kind of things.’
Under Science it can be analysed from Biology and Mathematics.
The basis for Life , as we assume is Hydrogen and Oxygen.
Based on these parameters, wherever these substances are available, the chances of Life are high.
But we do not seem to be getting ant where till date with this information for we have found places with abundance of water, still no signs of Life.
Mathematically speaking the chances of Life in the Universe are as high/low as
A Spiral Galaxy.
The mathematical model produced by Prof Andrew Watson suggests that the odds of finding new life on other Earth-like planets are low because of the time it has taken for beings such as humans to evolve and the remaining life span of the Earth. Structurally complex and intelligent life evolved late on Earth and this process might be governed by a small number of very difficult evolutionary steps.
Prof Watson, from the School of Environmental Sciences, takes this idea further by looking at the probability of each of these critical steps occurring in relation to the life span of the Earth, giving an improved mathematical model for the evolution of intelligent life.
According to Prof Watson a limit to evolution is the habitability of Earth, and any other Earth-like planets, which will end as the sun brightens. Solar models predict that the brightness of the sun is increasing, while temperature models suggest that because of this the future life span of Earth will be ‘only’ about another billion years, a short time compared to the four billion years since life first appeared on the planet.
“The Earth’s biosphere is now in its old age and this has implications for our understanding of the likelihood of complex life and intelligence arising on any given planet,” said Prof Watson.
“At present, Earth is the only example we have of a planet with life. If we learned the planet would be habitable for a set period and that we had evolved early in this period, then even with a sample of one, we’d suspect that evolution from simple to complex and intelligent life was quite likely to occur. By contrast, we now believe that we evolved late in the habitable period, and this suggests that our evolution is rather unlikely. In fact, the timing of events is consistent with it being very rare indeed.”
Prof Watson suggests the number of evolutionary steps needed to create intelligent life, in the case of humans, is four. These probably include the emergence of single-celled bacteria, complex cells, specialized cells allowing complex life forms, and intelligent life with an established language.
“Complex life is separated from the simplest life forms by several very unlikely steps and therefore will be much less common. Intelligence is one step further, so it is much less common still,” said Prof Watson.
His model, published in the journal Astrobiology, suggests an upper limit for the probability of each step occurring is 10 per cent or less, so the chances of intelligent life emerging is low – less than 0.01 per cent over four billion years.
Each step is independent of the other and can only take place after the previous steps in the sequence have occurred. They tend to be evenly spaced through Earth’s history and this is consistent with some of the major transitions identified in the evolution of life on Earth.”
By the above Logic, Life must exist in places where the Stars are old and at a time of its Evolution is comparable to the time when Life evolved in Earth.
Even here we are drawing a blank or are we not looking properly?
Again, since we know(assume?) Life on Earth has evolved from Bactria , we assume that All Life forms must follow the same procedure.
I do not think this is sound Logic.
There is a probability that Life might have evolved through some other process of which we know nothing.
The building block of Life may be different from what is found on Earth.
Taking these facts into consideration I feel that we are not alone and that now we lack the technology and skills to track it.
Related:
When speaking about the probability of extraterrestrial life, Carl Sagan, always said that extraordinary claims required extraordinary evidence. Recent discoveries of planets similar to Earth in size and proximity to the planets’ respective suns have sparked scientific and public excitement about the possibility of also finding Earth-like life on those worlds.
“Fossil evidence suggests that life began very early in Earth’s history and that has led people to determine that life might be quite common in the universe because it happened so quickly here, but the knowledge about life on Earth simply doesn’t reveal much about the actual probability of life on other planets,” says Princeton astrophysical sciences professor Edwin Turner.
But Princeton Universityresearchers have found that the expectation that life — from bacteria to sentient beings — has or will develop on other planets as on Earth might be based more on optimism than scientific evidence.Turner and David Spiegel, a former Princeton postdoctoral researcher, analyzed what is known about the likelihood of life on other planets in an effort to separate the facts from the mere expectation that life exists outside of Earth. The researchers used a Bayesian analysis — which weighs how much of a scientific conclusion stems from actual data and how much comes from the prior assumptions of the scientist — to determine the probability of extraterrestrial life once the influence of these presumptions is minimized.
Turner and Spiegel, who is now at the Institute for Advanced Study, reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that the idea that life has or could arise in an Earth-like environment has only a small amount of supporting evidence, most of it extrapolated from what is known about abiogenesis, or the emergence of life, on early Earth. Instead, their analysis showed that the expectations of life cropping up on exoplanets — those found outside Earth’s solar system — are largely based on the assumption that it would or will happen under the same conditions that allowed life to flourish on this planet.
In fact, the researchers conclude, the current knowledge about life on other planets suggests that it’s very possible that Earth is a cosmic aberration where life took shape unusually fast. If so, then the chances of the average terrestrial planet hosting life would be low.
“Information about that probability comes largely from the assumptions scientists have going in, and some of the most optimistic conclusions have been based almost entirely on those assumptions,” Turner said.
Turner and Spiegel used Bayes’ theorem to assign a sliding mathematical weight to the prior assumption that life exists on other planets. The “value” of that assumption was used to determine the probability of abiogenesis, in this case defined as the average number of times that life arises every billion years on an Earth-like planet. Turner and Spiegel found that as the influence of the assumption increased, the perceived likelihood of life existing also rose, even as the basic scientific data remained the same.
“If scientists start out assuming that the chances of life existing on another planet as it does on Earth are large, then their results will be presented in a way that supports that likelihood,” Turner said. “Our work is not a judgment, but an analysis of existing data that suggests the debate about the existence of life on other planets is framed largely by the prior assumptions of the participants.”
Joshua Winn, an associate professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said that Turner and Spiegel cast convincing doubt on a prominent basis for expecting extraterrestrial life. Winn, who focuses his research on the properties of exoplanets, is familiar with the research but had no role in it.
“There is a commonly heard argument that life must be common or else it would not have arisen so quickly after the surface of the Earth cooled,” Winn said. “This argument seems persuasive on its face, but Spiegel and Turner have shown it doesn’t stand up to a rigorous statistical examination — with a sample of only one life-bearing planet, one cannot even get a ballpark estimate of the abundance of life in the universe.”
“I also have thought that the relatively early emergence of life on Earth gave reasons to be optimistic about the search for life elsewhere,” Winn said. “Now I’m not so sure, though I think scientists should still search for life on other planets to the extent we can.
.
You must be logged in to post a comment.