One of the accused in the New Delhi Gang Rape is being booked as a ‘Juvenile”.
And the school Principal where the Rapist studied appeared before the Juvenile Justice Board in response to its summons to help determine his exact age.
Can there be anything more silly or Outrageous than this?
If you are old enough to rape and that too in a gang rape, you deserve to be treated as an adult, that too a criminal of the worst order.
Hope the boy’s parents regret begetting a son like this.
Are the police likely to allow the rapist to plead ‘insanity’ to escape Justice?
I can see some unprincipled lawyers working on this angle.
Story:
A Delhi court on Monday ordered in-camera trial of the Delhi gangrape case and restrained the media from reporting and publishing trial proceedings.
The magisterial court took cognizance of the chargesheet on Saturday and had issued production warrants for the five accused for Monday. The matter will come up for hearing on January 10. A copy of the chargesheet has been provided to the accused.
Allowing the police plea for conducting in-camera proceedings, Aggarwal shared the apprehension raised by the public prosecutor regarding the safety of the undertrial prisoners. She quoted the Saket court complex’s lock-up in-charge, who said that he was unable to bring the accused in the court for want of safe passage or room in the courtroom.
The sources said the juvenile court was not satisfied with the age-related documents presented Monday by the principal of the school in Uttar Pradesh’s Badaun and asked him to produce more documents related to the juvenile’s age by January 15.
The juvenile, one of the six accused in the gang-rape of a 23-year-old trainee paramedical in a moving bus here December 16, had done his primary education from the school.
A FIR was lodged against Rapper Honey Singh by an IPS Officer for his obscene Lyric content of hid songs.
Rapper Honey Singh has been a chart-topper this year, and he had two songs on YouTube’s list of top 10 most-popular videos of 2012 for India.
Honey Singh’s two songs are featured among top ten Popular Videos on YouTube.
An Online Petition has also been on against him for the ‘porn and misogynistic content ‘ of his lyric.
” “These pornographic lyrics are unacceptable and it is because of women hating (sic) sentiments like these that men think that it’s fine to do what they did on that bus, that December night in Delhi. Let’s put a stop to these subversive lyrics that infiltrate the minds of people who don’t know better and who then justify to themselves the rightness of a crime that harms another human being, sometimes so severely that they lose their lives.”
Honey Singh Dancing.
“Choot”
Aja teri choot maroon
Tere sir se chudney ka bhoot utaroon
Choodney key baad tujhe jutey maroon
Tere mooh main apna lora dey key mooth maroon (yeah)
Kar doon teri fuddi kharab
Merey jesa koi nahin meree bhudi kharab
Terey baad tere post
Bas yahi kaam kaaj mera
Kar doon ga khush tujhe
Luraa ley key naach mera……
Choda hoga tujh ko hazaroon ney
Mehngay mehngay kamroon mein
Lambi caroon mein
Bollywood key baray baray sitroon ney
Per merey lund jeesa dum naa bicharoon mein
Mein karoon din raat ek
Guzar merey saath ek raat …dekh
Terey jesey maine toree ek raat mein…
Aazma key dekh ley, dum kitni hai baat mein”
His programme on New Year’s Eve in Gurgaon. was canceled.
Honey Singh denied his penning these lyrics.
“Fearing for his life, in a startling revelation, Honey Singh claims the offensive song is not his at all.
“I swear on my music. I’ve neither written nor sung those offensive songs. I’d never dream of singing a song in praise of rape,” he says. “The thought is nauseating to me. I’d rather give up singing than attain popularity in such cheap and cheesy ways.”
Singh claims the song was released on the Internet by an imposter: “I’ve sent notices to YouTube and other Web sites which have uploaded the offensive number. I am shocked that such a song could even be believed to be mine.”
“I come from a family where women are respected and I’d never disrespect women by espousing rape,” he says.'(rediff.com)
Linking this to the incidence of the Gang rape in Delhi is sheer non sense.
People should not be carried away by emotions, trying to find a reason everywhere for th Delhi gang rape.
While it is indeed objectionable and perverse to sing these songs, the fact is this form has always been there right from the earliest societies.
We have Limericks,Sexual ballads,in Folk songs.
I am not sure how many know of this.
In fact some of the Tamil Folk songs are so vulgar sometimes you start hating Sex!
This and Strip tease, Belly dancing,cabarets ,nauch walis are here to stay.
Do you know wrote the following lines?
“Cock
One can hardly miss the vulgarity of “Pistol’s cock is up,/And flashing fire will follow” (Henry V, II.i.52-53;also see PISTOL). Outside such double entendres, cock was also a substitute for the even more shocking word “God,” as in “By Cock” (Hamlet, IV.v.61) and “Cock’s passion” (Shrew IV.i.118)
Erection
“They mistook their erection,” notes Mistress Quickly, meaning to say “directions.” Falstaff responds, “So did I mine, to build upon a foolish woman’s promise” (Wives, III.v.39-42)
Finger
The term “fingering” is more obviously bawdy in Cymbeline, when Cloten the clownish gallant hires musicians to help “penetrate” his resistant love object, Imogen. “Come on, tune. If you can penetrate her with your fingering, so; we’ll try with tongue too” (II.iii.14-15)
Plough
“Royal wench!” marvels Agrippa; “She [Cleopatra] made great ceasar lay his sword to bed;/ He ploughed her, and she cropp’d[gave birth]” (Antony, II.ii,227-29). “And if she [chaste Marina] were a thornier piece of ground than she is,” the pimp Boult proposes, “she shall be plough’d” (pericles, IV.vi.144-45).
Privates, Secret Parts
Genitalia. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern tell Hamlet they are neither sad nor over-happy — “on Fortune’s cap,” says Guildenstern, “we are not the very button.” “Nor the soles of her shoe?” asks Hamlet; “Neither, my lord,” Rosencrantz replies. “Then,” the prince continues, “you live about her waist, or in the middle of her favors?” “Faith,” jests Guildenstern, “her privates we.” Hamelet: “In the sweet parts of Fortune? O, most true, she is a strumpet [whore]” (HAmlet, II.ii228-36).”
Hinduism prescribes strictest punishment for Rape.
Manu Smriti , apart from laying guidelines for the treatment for Rape.
Manu Smriti, Hindu Law.
8.323. Those who abduct women should be given death sentence.
9.232. Those who kill women, children or scholarly virtuous people should be given strictest punishment.
8.352. Those who rape or molest women or incite them into adultery should be given harshest punishment that creates fear among others to even think of such a crime.
8. 275. One should be punished if he puts false allegations or demeans mother, wife or daughter.
8.389. Those who abandon their mother, father, wife or children without any reasonable reason should face severe punishments.
357. Offering presents (to a woman), romping (with her), touching her ornaments and dress, sitting with her on a bed, all (these acts) are considered adulterous acts (samgrahana).
363. Yet he who secretly converses with such women, or with female slaves kept by one (master), and with female ascetics, shall be compelled to pay a small fine.
367. But if any man through insolence forcibly contaminates a maiden, two of his fingers shall be instantly cut off, and he shall pay a fine of six hundred (panas).
370. But a woman who pollutes a damsel shall instantly have (her head) shaved or two fingers cut off, and be made to ride (through the town) on a donkey.
385. A Brahmana who approaches unguarded females (of the) Kshatriya or Vaisya (castes), or a Sudra female, shall be fined five hundred (panas); but (for intercourse with) a female (of the) lowest (castes), one thousand.
Amidst high drama, MIM MLAAkbaruddin Owaisi, who is facing multiple cases for his alleged ” hate speech“, was on Tuesday arrested after medical tests in a government hospital here a day after his arrival from London.(times of india)
Arrested at last?
Update on 8 January 2013.
Akbaruddin Owaisi has returned from his Holiday jaunt and he has been taken to Government Hospital Hyderabad before his impending arrest for his ‘Hate Speech’
Police explain this step as he is a “representative of the people”
Has this courtesy been extended to others?
More the notoriety, more the Respect?
The despicable inaction by the central Government in delaying the holding of a Special Session of the Parliament in handling of the amendments to rape Act and its defiant refusal to take action against Akbaruddin Owaisi, who has been spewing venom against Hindus by inciting the Muslims ,exhorting them to kill Hindus, has one Common reason, a despicable one.
Akbaruddin Owaisi
While the Delhi gang rape victim belongs to the Hindu(majority) community,Owaisi is from the Minority Muslim Community.
Norbhaya the Delhi Gang Rape Victim
I am sure that the Government would have swung into action if the gang rape victim had been a Muslim and Owaisi had been a Hindu inciting Hindus.
The pseudo secularism is taking the country and the Society towards destruction.
What more the Governments expects?
More gang rapes and Hindus and Muslims killing each other?
In the case of Owaisi , what is the meaning of the Constitution of India, if he is allowed to go scot-free?
‘The Constitution of India does not provide for a state religion. Article 25(1) states, “Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion”. Article 19 gives all citizens the right to freedom of speech and expression but subject to “reasonable restrictions” for preserving inter alia “public order, decency or morality”. Article 28 prohibits any religious instruction in any educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds. Article 51A(h) imposes on every citizen the duty to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform.[1]
Laws restricting the freedom of expression
India prohibits hate speech by several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and by other laws which put limitations on the freedom of expression. Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure gives the government the right to declare certain publications “forfeited” if the “publication … appears to the State Government to contain any matter the publication of which is punishable under Section 124A or Section 153A or Section 153B or Section 292 or Section 293 or Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code”.[2]
Section 153A of the penal code says, inter alia:
Whoever (a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility, . . . shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.[3]
Enacted in 1927, section 295A says:
Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of [citizens of India], [by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise], insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to [three years], or with fine, or with both.[4][
“Hyderabad, Jan 1: The man who filed a case against Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) legislator Akbaruddin Owaisi in connection with the latter’s Dec 24 hate speech today urged people to approach the courts with more such petitions. Since K Karunasagar received three death threats on the night of Dec 28, he has already appealed for security. The Andhra Pradesh Human Rights Commission has directed the Hyderabad Police Commissioner to enquire into the matter and submit a report by Jan 17. Karunasagar isn’t the only one to be offended by Owaisi’s utterances. Yesterday, the BJP asked the Congress-led government in the state to book the MIM leader as he has made several provocative speeches of late. State BJP president Kishan Reddy pointed out that the government could ask the Election Commission to de-recognise MIM and also get the membership of Owaisi, MLA representing the Chandrayan Gutta constituency, annulled by the Assembly Speaker. Meanwhile, group of eminent citizens demanded that Owaisi be prosecuted for inciting violence. Stressing that his statements can “divide society, vitiate peace and lead to conflicts and riots”, film maker Mahesh Bhatt, social activist Swami Agnivesh, Hamid Mohammad Khan, Irfan Engineer, Mazher Hussain, Ram Punyani, M Mandal, Dr Asghar Ali Engineer and Sandeep Panday called for “exemplary action in the matter to ensure that such intolerable acts are never repeated again, anywhere by anyone and secure peace and harmony in the country.” Owaisi had been particularly belligerent while addressing MIM supporters at Nirmal town in Adilabad district of Andhra Pradesh on Dec 24, 2012. He said: “If the police are removed for just 15 minutes, 25 crore Muslims in the country will show they are mightier than 100 crore Hindus. http://news.oneindia.in/2013/01/01/petitioner-seeks-more-plaints-against-akbaruddin-owaisi-1123638.html
You must be logged in to post a comment.