Daily Bhaskar has published a story on how the entire operation was carried out in terms of Money Distribution and process.
Here is the report.
Srinivasan says there is nothing for him to resign!
Money Trail of IPL Match Fixings trail.
That a certain Dawood Ibrahim and his kin control the cricket betting network is an open secret. What, however, is surprising, even admirable, is the deftness and corporate-style dexterity with which the syndicate functions…
The well-connected Tiku Mandi got in touch with a host of Indian bookies. Jupiter, Baburao Yadav, Jiju Janardhan and Amit Singh are the ones contacted. Janardhan got in touch with S Sreesanth, Ankeet Chavan and Ajit Chandila who ‘fix’ spots in various games.
Vindu- Guru link
Where does small time actor –celebrity Vindu Dara Singh come into picture? Well Ramesh Vyas, the middleman between Jr Kolkat and Tiku Mandi, got in touch with Vindu, who in turn contacted Chennai Super Kings CEO Gurunath Meiyappan. Mumbai Police maintains that Vindu and Guru spoke to each other over 130 times. Vindu’s call records further reveal he was in “constant touch” with the bookies. Gurunath reportedly placed bets on 9 IPL games, before deciding to trade team secrets to Vindu in lieu of about Rs. 1 crore that he had lost in betting..
Sreesanth has also been reported to have been in touch with a Bollywood casting director. His laptop and notebook points to his e-mail interactions with a suspected Bollywood casting director, who sent him pictures of models.
There was a new story yesterday on Headlines Today, 20 May 2013, that Sreesanth was making a Malayalam Film and was asked to select Models .
This could also be a reason for his interaction with women.
Let’s him the benefit of doubt, on this point.
But declaring ‘want as many women as possible?’
Story:
According to reports, the names and pictures of more than 40 models and aspiring actresses along with their phone numbers have been found from Sreesanth’s laptop.
CNN IBN claimed that police have also retrieved a list of contact numbers saved in a folder in the laptop, and all were saved under code names. ….
Sreesanth wanted as many women as possible for parties.
It is reported that the Marathi actress was present in Sreesanth’s room when the police had arrested him for his alleged involvement in spot-fixing case . However, the police have refused to reveal the identity of the Marathi actress as of now.
IPL6 Match fixing and Women.
It is alleged that the spot fixing racket is being controlled by D-Company from Pakistan. Notorious underworld gangster Dawood Ibrahim is supposed to have made Rs. 1,200 crore already in the present edition of the Indian Premier League. Delhi Police sources had earlier informed they stumbled on the spot fixing racket after they recorded the phone calls of aides of Tiger Memon with bookies.
Earlier, one of the eleven bookies arrested by Delhi Police Special Cell revealed during interrogation that videos of both Sreesanth and Ajit Chandila with call girls had been shot in order to blackmail them in case they didn’t execute their instructions.
Sreesanth had plans to party all night “with as many women as possible” on May 15, the Delhi Police have said. They claimed the cricketer was drunk and easily lured to Mumbai’s Trident hotel, where police had already arrested his bookie friend Jiju Janardhan. “We nabbed Jiju
first and sought his help in luring Sreesanth,” an investigating officer said Sunday. “Jiju was made to call and tell him to come to the Trident, so he could be introduced to a female friend.” Minutes later, Sreesanth arrived at the Trident with a “woman on his arm”.Police also said that when Jiju called him, Sreesanth told him he was “resting at home”.
In a Cricket match, when two teams play or in a league match, the outcome of the match is predetermined and bets are placed on the teams .
Then money changes hands based on the outcome of the match.
Mohammed Azharuddin, The Fixer of Cricket Matches, India.
This is not legalized.
The primary mover of the system, usually the Underworld,operates through persons who accept the bets called ‘Bookies‘
They get in touch with the players, offer them money and induce them to throw away the match,either by tactics or selection of players.
Apart from this,there is another system which is called ‘spot fixing‘
Here the outcome of the Match is not altered, but the components of the game, especially Bowling is manipulated’ like giving away ‘wides’,bowling ‘No Balls“.
What is spot-fixing? Spot fixing is about getting players/officials to act in a specified predefined manner at a particular time or during a particular session of a match, with or without adversely affecting the overall outcome of the game. It is also known as micro-fixing or fancy-fixing.
What kinds of events does spot-fixing target?Anything from the ordinary to the bizarre can be the focus of spot-fixing. Who will win the toss, which umpire will stand at which end of the wicket, how many players will be wearing sunglasses, how many times the wicketkeeper will take the bails off in an innings, which bowler will come on first change, when the new ball will be taken. All of these and any number of other similar (and at times very silly) aspects can become the subject matter of both legal and illegal bets. If a fixer has prior information relating to a predetermined occurrence during a specific period or session of a match, he can make a killing and happily share a part of the booty with the player/official who is his accomplice.
What is session betting? Each innings of 50 overs in an ODI is divided into three sessions of 15, 15 and 20 overs each. For each session, bets are accepted on permutations and combinations involving runs scored and wickets taken, and more marginal aspects along the lines of those mentioned above, such as, for instance, how many wide balls will be bowled in a particular session. In recent times both legal and illegal bookkeepers have started offering odds on session betting. Thus the number of options for betting in a six-session ODI are multiplied many times – as opposed to just betting on the outcomes at the end of the match.
What kind of inside information do bookies look for to help with spot-fixing? Bookies and punters are always looking for inside information, especially information emanating from dressing rooms: the condition of the pitch, the team composition, who will open the batting, injuries – anything that may impact a specific session of the match or events within, or the final outcome. The players in their innocence or ignorance, or in connivance, may share such inside information.”
Right now, the Don who controls this system is Dawood Ibrahim, who is an accused in the Mumbai Bomb blast in India.
I have been feeling that, ever since the IPL6 betting story broke out with the arrest of Srresanth, Chandila and Chavan , the BCCI’s and the official broadcaster, Set Max, muted and in cases where there was a discussion it appeared as though it was a reluctant one.
This could not have been only due to the official coyness resulting from the fact that the’ enquiry was in progress’ line’.
I found some one who has similar suspicions.
It is curious to note the difference in speaking about the accused, including Sreesanth , for their role in the IPL6 match fixing.
Compare this with the earlier Cricket match fixing cases, say , the one involving Azharuddin and in another case of the Pakistani Cricketers.
This deafening silence is not limited to only BCCI.
What about the ICC?
Now news comes out that the Dawood Ibrahim’s group might have terrorized the cricketer into participating in the match fixing! The IPL spot-fixing controversy acquired a sinister edge on Saturday. Delhi Police sleuths investigating the crime said that D Company mobsters controlling the illegal betting operations were desperate to involve other young IPL players to join the spot-fixing racket.
According to transcripts of recorded phone conversations between bookies and gangsters, the criminals instructed bookies to threaten some young players with dire consequences if they refused to cooperate.”
”
Is this a trial run to exonerate the accused, step by step?
There is another track where Chhota Shakeel divulging that Dawood Ibrahim’is ‘not interested and never involved in cricket gambling”(!?)
There is also a report that Dawood Ibrahim gang has collected Rs 1200 crores from IPL 6 match fixing, so far!(jaimaharastra news)
Cricket Betting IPL6
Story:
First Ramiz Raja asked Rahul Dravid, the Royals captain, about the “tough couple of days”. Then, toss done and lost, Dravid is asked the same question by Alistair Campbell. Same answer – It’s been tough for everyone who follows the game. One does not expect, on the official channel, a full-fledged discussion on spot-fixing but to avoid the issue altogether is a blinkered policy that works only in societies where despotic regimes have cut off all access to the outside world. It merely confirms, for the critics, the impression that the IPL – or, at least, its coverage on the official channel – is less about the cricket and more about the entertainment…. t was like watching two parallel universes: one, in which the crisis was being discussed threadbare, with all its implications and interpretations, and another in which the crisis didn’t exist. (There was a third universe – the spectators in the Hyderabad stadium who, as our reporter Abhishek Purohit wrote, knew the facts but didn’t really care.).. Contrast this with ITV’s coverage of the IPL in the UK; there was a frank and free discussion on Thursday, the day the story broke, with the participants – including Aakash Chopra – at liberty to discuss the story after a briefing by lawyers…
There is an uproar in the Media,especially the Electronic that the BJP President Gadkari had insulted Swami Vivekananda by comparing him with the Underworld Don Dawood Ibrahim.
Surprising is the fact that the Media , which should be impartial have been screaming, to the extent that TimesNow News Channel devoted a Debate in Prime time.
Do these people not listen to the audio?
Gadkari.
Where exactly does Gadkari compare Swami Vivekananda and Dawood Ibrahim per se?
He states that though the IQ levels of Swami Vivekananda and Dawood may be the same ( which is of course is open to question), while Vivekananda used it in Nation Building activities, Dawood in Criminal activities.
The possession of IQ is not important but the use of it.
I do not see any thing objectionable in this statement.
When you want to high light a point it is normal to compare the Best and the Worst, in this case the use of Buddhi.(intellect).
Knowing the scams he is involved in Gadkari could have kept his mouth shut.
I am reminded of the instance when the ace Film Director K.Balachander made films like Arangetram where a Brahmin girl becomes a prostitute, there was an uproar that he was insulting the Brahmin community.
K.Balachander is a Brahmin.
Balachanders reply was ‘ I wanted to high light the travails and the degradation of values.
What better way than to show the Brahmin community which is regarded as the epitome of Cultural values?
You must be logged in to post a comment.