Tag: Current events

  • Risk in investing Politically Connected Companies.SUNTV.

    The scam involving Dayanidhi Maran and investment by Maxi in The SUN Network under dubious circumstances, has brought into the fore the volatility of stocks where investors, ipso facto,placed their money trusting more on the political connections than the soundness of the project.

    This is not to underestimate the competency of the SUN network;in fact it is still the best-managed  professional Communications company in India

    However, apart from the highly competitive nature of the Industry, the creative assets switching loyalties(remember major creative talent went over to Kalaignar TV when it was started),as policy decisions affect the industry very seriously,the present equation between the DMK and Congress at the Center is highly fluid and susceptible to snapping, the SUN scrips are in for a down ward spiral, unless of course it is propped by you know how by private investors.

    This again could trigger media glare and further loss of confidence by the investors.

    The Government might also indirectly pressurize the  indirectly controlled Govt/Public sector/Banks to offload shares.

    This might affect the stock value further.

    Sad for a professional, successful Company.

    Story:

    Shares in Sun TV and the budget carrier SpiceJet crashed by over 27% and 16% respectively on Thursday, following an expose in Tehelka magazine about the role of Dayanidhi Maran when he was the telecom minister between 23 May 2004 and 15 May 2007….

    This underlines the perils of investing in companies that seem to grow easily and fast-but with generous political patronage. The shares crashed on allegations that Mr Maran’s family-owned business, Sun TV, received substantial investment from the Maxis Group (which owns Aircel) which picked up 20% equity in Sun Direct. The government approved this investment on 2 March and 19 March 2007. Maxis Group invested a total of Rs599.01 crore in Sun Direct between December 2007 and December 2009. …

    With the DMK-linked companies in a soup and DMK out of power in Tamil Nadu, a cloud hangs over the immediate prospects of these companies. The stock prices are unlikely to recover soon. Among the mutual fundinvestors in Sun TV and SpiceJet that would have suffered losses are IDFC Premier Equity, Fidelity Equity, Morgan Stanley Growth, Sundaram Select Midcap, DSP BlackRock T.I.G.E.R and SBI Tax Advantage Series I ..

    The promoters of Sun TV hold 77%, while foreign institutional investors (FIIs) hold 9.49%, domestic institutional investors (DII) hold 3.06% of the equity, and the remaining 10.45% is with retail investors. In SpiceJet, the promoters hold 38.61%, FIIs hold 11.84% and DIIs hold 15.10% equity respectively. The remaining 35.45% is the retail shareholding.

    Clearly, institutional investors have a significant holding in both companies and they will have a difficult task recovering their investments. The main problem is that both SunTV and SpiceJet have strong political patronage which will be undermined by new polticial equations. Analysts believe that with the DMK’s arch rival J Jayalalithaa of AIADMK, coming to power as chief minister in Tamil Nadu, and the scam-ridden UPA at the Centre, both Maran-family owned companies will find it difficult to grow.

    http://www.moneylife.in/article/perils-of-investing-in-companies-growing-through-political-links/16980.html

  • Pakistanis Want Islamisation Of Society,and Readers Comments.

    Considering the timing of the release of the data one might be excused in surmising that this could be a planted story to provide an alibi for the US to invade Pakistan.

    You may use the  Link for details in pdf format.

    http://www.gallup.com.pk/pollsshow.php?id=2011-05-31

    May 31, 2011
     
    Majority (67%) Is In Favour Of State Facilitating ‘Islamization‘ Of Society: However, 48% Say Steps Should Be Taken One By One
     
     
    According to a Gilani Research Foundation survey carried out by Gallup Pakistan, more than two third of all Pakistanis (67%) believe that government should take steps for the Islamization of the society. However, 48% say steps should be taken one by one as opposed 31% who state steps should be taken at once.In a survey, a nationally representative sample of men and women from across the country were asked the following question: “In your opinion should government take steps to ‘Islamize’ the society?” Sixty seven percent (67%) replied in affirmative where as only 13% believed that there is no need for ‘Islamization’. A significant 20% gave no response.

    As many as 67 per cent people of Pakistan want the government take steps for Islamisation, a clear indication that for whatever reasons they have lost faith in the existing system.
    According to a survey carried out by Gilani Research Foundation, 31 per cent people want the government take the required steps at once. However, 48 per cent think that the needed steps should be taken one by one. People approached for survey had been asked: “In your opinion should the government take steps to Islamise the society?” These findings clearly mean that the claims made by various elements that Pakistan should be a secular state are totally baseless and contrary to the wishes of the people.
    This is a unique kind of survey carried out by an organization (Gallup Pakistan) in a society where more than 90 per cent people are Muslims, no matter which sect they belong to. That 31 per cent people want ‘immediate’ steps for Islamisation means that they are totally disappointed with the ability of the existing system to solve their problems and want to switch over to the Islamic system, for the sake of which the country had been created in 1947.
    According to the survey, 48 per cent people are for a gradual approach. In other words, they want the government to take the required steps one by one.
    Without any iota of doubt, these people also pin their hopes on the Islamic system, but want it introduced gradually, which, ostensibly, means that no hasty step should be taken which had the potential to backfire.
    Thirteen per cent of those approached for their opinions said there was no need for Islamization. Such people could be secularists, liberals or of the minority communities.
    Twenty per cent people, according to the survey, gave no response.
    Their decision not to answer the question may mean that for them Islamization is not that important.
    Their silence could also be taken to mean that they are not concerned for what the government does, or doesn’t do, on this front.

    http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/01-Jun-2011/67pc-want-Islamisation-of-society   

    Some comments From Pakistan on this.

    I am for Islamic law … very easy to follow, and implement…

    Mee too, Or we would have been better off with Secular India if Islam was not the intension…

    Shame on the 31% of people who wanted immediate Islamization…illiterate idiots, they should learn from the ‘Pakistani’ democrats sitting in Britain/U.S…

    http://www.khilafah.com/

    I’d probably put myself in that hated 31%. Not because i dont want an iamic society in Pakistan, but because i dont trust anyone to implement it corre tly, without bias and an agenda. Do we have an institute or collection of institutes who have the means, knowlefdge and will to do such a thing? We need to take immediate steps to build the infrastructure to have islamic state. Judges who cant be bought, generals who will march our army to the gates of hell if needs be for the right reasons, lawyers trained in islamic law, awarenesss programs, teaching of literacy to aid learning of islam at least etc etc.

    This is a crude example, but how would you migrate all computer systems in an office from windows to open source platforms overnight? You wouldnt, you would make a plan to check compatibility, port data, processes, train staff, etc.

    Lets not judge the 31%. With the mullahs we have do you really blame them?..

    QUOTE (platinum786 @ Jun 1 2011, 05:32 PM) *
    Do we have an institute or collection of institutes who have the means, knowlefdge and will to do such a thing? We need to take immediate steps to build the infrastructure to have islamic state. Judges who cant be bought, generals who will march our army to the gates of hell if needs be for the right reasons, lawyers trained in islamic law, awarenesss programs, teaching of literacy to aid learning of islam at least etc etc.

    Lets not judge the 31%. With the mullahs we have do you really blame them?..

    i am with you in the 31%; for the same reason, we are the cautious ones not anti-islam

    does anyone here think the current leader of the religious party is ready to be the prime minister/president of the country
    I doubt it

    The Pakistan Army trains its best recruits to be officers; and among the secularists; the best who stay in Pakistan go to the best universities in Pakistan; get overseas degrees; and those that come back run the big companies

    In this same way; a group of top universities need to be formed; and those that have the best potential from among the religious minded people should be trained in all fields; along with co-education step by step, alongside, in islam

    these students become Scholars in the true sense of the word; experts in their fields; top notch engineers, agriculutral engineers, doctors, scientists, artists, writers, poets, journalists, basically all fields

    and these students are trained in religious instruction; in the logical incremental method of the university of timbuktu (Primary School; Secondary (High) School, University, and Gradate School; worldly knowledge and religious instruction)

    when it comes to Law; this is where these students will be key; because some will specialize and go all the way; islamic lawyers and judges, with full training in all the secular arts and sciences (just like islamic scholars during the golden age)

    and these scholars will debate, openly, for all to see (remember before asking the people, democratically, to accept or reject their vision), and they should publish their debates, allow scholars from around the world to debate, and in a way form a concenus, that is valid for all muslims

    this way they will have visibly shown Islamic law (majority of the scholars judgements) and that it is the same islam accepted all over the islamic world
    and therefore have the legitimacy to run a government (if the people wish it, after seeing what it would really be like)

    http://forum.pakistanidefence.com/index.php?s=a408b7e613a95fb1f1ce6a579aae3c99&showtopic=94086&pid=1319573&st=0&#entry1319573

    The 48 per cent people, who want a gradual approach, also pin their hopes on the Islamic system, but want it to be introduced gradually, which ostensibly means that they think any hasty steps might have the potential to backfire.

    Thirteen per cent of those approached for their opinions said that there was no need for Islamisation. Such people could be secularists, liberals or of the minority communities.

    Twenty per cent people gave no response, which may mean that Islamization is not that important for them.

    Their silence could also be taken to mean that they are not concerned for what the government does or does not do on this front.

    http://news.in.msn.com/international/article.aspx?cp-documentid=5186903&page=3

    Related:

    A group of radical clerics in Pakistan wants the country’s Supreme Court to declare certain passages in the Bible blasphemous – because they depict as flawed certain biblical characters whom Muslims regard as Islamic prophets.

    http://frstephensmuts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/pakistani-muslims-ban-the-bible/

  • Inside Al-Qaeda and the Taliban: Beyond 9/11-Syed Saleem Shahzad.Excerpts.

    Myriad of evidence is piling up about ISI’s collusion with Al_Qaeda.

    Even Pasha would not have had access to the wealth of material found in the Book.

    But Pakistan’s propensity for ignoring what is destroying their Nation is well-known.

    It will take action ,it seems, only if the Sal himself proclaims the Truth about ISI.

    The Book , a good read, lays bare the skeletons in Pakistan’s cup board.

    A myriad of authors, journalists, academics and analysts have attempted to analyze what drives Al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders and fighters. Syed Saleem Shahzad is the only one to have gone to their strongholds and asked them. Shahzad, a Pakistani investigative reporter, has a level of access to Al-Qaeda and the Taliban that Western journalists can only dream of. He has interviewed many top-level strategists and fighters in both movements on multiple occasions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Jordan. In Inside Al-Qaeda and the Talibanhe uses first-hand accounts and his own local knowledge to build up a convincing picture of the aims and motivation of the leaders and fighters in radical Islamic movements. This is a version of the “war on terror” that has never been told. It will fascinate anyone concerned with the strategy and tactics of the most controversial Islamic movements….

    Syed Saleem Shahzad, a Pakistani investigative reporter, has a level of access to Al-Qaeda and the Taliban that Western journalists can only dream of. He has interviewed many top-level strategists and fighters in both movements on multiple occasions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Jordan. In Inside Al-Qaedaand the Taliban he uses first-hand accounts and his own local knowledge to build up a convincing and compelling picture of the aims and motivation of the leaders and fighters in radical Islamic movements.

    This is a version of the ‘war on terror’ that has never been told. It will fascinate anyone concerned with the strategy and tactics of the most controversial Islamic movements…

    “With Ilyas Kashmiri’s immense expertise on Indian operations, he stunned the Al-Qaeda leaders with the suggestion that expanding the war theatre was the only way to overcome the present impasse. He presented the suggestion of conducting such a massive operation in India as would bring India and Pakistan to war and with that all proposed operations against Al-Qaeda would be brought to a grinding halt. Al-Qaeda excitedly approved the attack-India proposal.”

    “Ilyas Kashmiri then handed over the plan to a very able former army major Haroon Ashik, who was also a former LeT commander who was still very close with the LeT chiefs Zakiur Rahman Lakhvi and Abu Hamza. Haroon knew about a plan by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) that had been in the pipelines for several months with the official policy to drop it as it was to have been a low-profile routine proxy operation in India through LeT.”

    “The former army major, with the help of Ilyas Kashmiri’s men in India, hijacked the ISI plan and turned it into the devastating attacks that shook Mumbai onNovember 26, 2008 and brought Pakistan and India to the brink of a war (a detailed account of this is presented in the next chapters). “


    The book contains important correspondence and all other details that former Kashmiri Jihadi and former armed forces officials changed Al-Qaeda/Taliban’s strategic perception in South Asian war theatre….

    “There has never been a full picture shown before of Al-Qaeda to a western audience. Whatever was portrayed was misleading. Thus all the decisions taken after 9/11 were wrongly directed. Intelligence services around the world pre-9/11 visualized Al-Qaeda simply as a disorganized group of mercenaries, not a sophisticated organization capable of orchestrating consequential attacks on the United States . Even when the new awareness of al-Qaeda’s capabilities dawned, the organisation’s true nature and intentions were a mystery. What remains a fact, however, is that the defeat of the United States has become an obsession with Al-Qaeda’s and it prepares its game plans accordingly.

    Ideas play pivotal role in wars. But ideas alone do not provide results. A fusion of ideas and resources are necessary for success. Absence of either one can lead to failure. Al-Qaeda came into existence in late 1980s. But it took its real shape when ideas fused with resources in the middle of 1990s: with the alliance of Dr Zawahiri’s ideas and Osama bin Laden’s resources.

    Six feet three inches tall, rich, and close enough to the Saudi royal family to be counted a family member, Osama was as an ‘angry young man’. 14 years ago in his native Saudi Arabia he spoke out against the kingdom for allowing western forces to use its territory after the first Gulf War. The Bin Laden family conglomerate was influential in business and highly respected in Saudi Arabia, as well as in the world business community. Family members finally persuaded Osama to appear personally before King Fahd for a royal pardon. Many important members of the Saudi royals, including Prince Turki and Prince Abdullah, tried their best to settle the dispute. But it was all to no avail.

    That was the beginning of the false impression presented about bin Laden and his supporters. US intelligence agencies reported him as a Saudi dissident who had fought bravely in Afghanistan against the Soviets in the 1980s, but who was no more than a political nuisance in Saudi Arabia . In fact, Osama Bin Laden had become anti-American to the core – and anti Saudi monarchy soon after they invited the Americans troops in the first Gulf War. But he did not have an ideology nor a strategy. Most political analysts believed his initial sloganeering against America would not amount to anything. And, had he not been met up with Al-Zawahiri in 1997 it may not have. But Dr Ayman Al-Zawahiri indoctrinated Osama Bin Laden’s with the idea of armed opposition to America and gave such a spin to it that Bin Laden’s uncertain security threat for America turned into a deadly reality.”

    What is Al-Qaeda upto without Bin Laden?…

    “The next step was ideological fusion: to spawn Al-Qaeda’s ideological genes in Ibnul Balad (Sons of the Soil) transforming them into `Blood Brothers’. The whole of the future war was to be fought by the Ibnul Balad from which Al-Qaeda aimed to produce a new generation of Dr Ayman Al-Zawahiris, with each and every segment of their lives committed to a life-long struggle. They were to live for the movement and die for it. But before they died they were to leave another generation behind to continue the war against America . This was Al-Qaeda’s arsenal.”..

    So far A-Qaeda has introduced a few leaders for example  Ilyas Kashmiri and his highly sophesticated guerrilla 313 Brigade who espoused the global Jihad.

    Born in Bimbur (old Mirpur) in the Samhani Valley of Pakistan-administered Kashmir on February 10, 1964, Ilyas passed the first year of a mass communication degree at Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad. He did not continue due to his heavy involvement in jihadi activities.

    The Kashmir Freedom Movement was his first exposure in the field of militancy, then the Harkat-ul Jihad-i-Islami (HUJI) and ultimately his legendary 313 Brigade. This grew into the most powerful group in South Asia and its network is strongly knitted in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir, India, Nepal and Bangladesh. According to some CIA dispatches, the footprints of 313 Brigade are now in Europe and capable of the type of attack that saw a handful of militants terrorize the Indian city of Mumbai last November.

    Little is documented of Ilyas’ life, and what has been reported is often contradictory. However, he is invariably described, certainly by world intelligence agencies, as the most effective, dangerous and successful guerrilla leader in the world.

    He left the Kashmir region in 2005 after his second release from detention by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and headed for North Waziristan. He had previously been arrested by Indian forces, but he broke out of jail and escaped. He was then detained by the ISI as the suspected mastermind of an attack on then-president Pervez Musharraf, in 2003, but was cleared and released. The ISI then picked Ilyas up again in 2005 after he refused to close down his operations in Kashmir.

    His relocation to the troubled border areas sent a chill down spines in Washington as they realized that with his vast experience, he could turn unsophisticated battle patterns in Afghanistan into audacious modern guerrilla warfare.

    Ilyas’ track record spoke for itself. In 1994, he launched the al-Hadid operation in the Indian capital, New Delhi, to get some of his jihadi comrades released. His group of 25 people included Sheikh Omar Saeed (the abductor of US reporter Daniel Pearl in Karachi in 2002) as his deputy. The group abducted several foreigners, including American, Israeli and British tourists and took them to Ghaziabad near Delhi. They then demanded that the Indian authorities release their colleagues, but instead they attacked the hideout. Sheikh Omar was injured and arrested. (He was later released in a swap for the passengers of a hijacked Indian aircraft). Ilyas escaped unhurt. On February 25, 2000, the Indian army killed 14 civilians in Lonjot village in Pakistan-administered Kashmir after commandos had crossed the Line of Control (LoC) that separates the two Kashmirs. They returned to the Indian side with abducted Pakistani girls, and threw the severed heads of three of them at Pakistani soldiers.

    The very next day, Ilyas conducted a guerilla operation against the Indian army in Nakyal sector after crossing the LoC with 25 fighters of 313 Brigade. They kidnapped an Indian army officer who was later beheaded – his head was paraded in the bazaars of Kotli back in Pakistani territory.

    However, the most significant operation of Ilyas was in Aknor cantonment in Indian-administered Kashmir against the Indian armed forces following the massacre of Muslims in the Indian city of Gujarat in 2002. In cleverly planned attacks involving 313 Brigade divided into two groups, Indian generals, brigadiers and other senior officials were lured to the scene of the first attack. Two generals were injured (the Pakistan army could not injure a single Indian general in three wars) and several brigadiers and colonels were killed. This was one of the most telling setbacks for India in the long-running Kashmiri insurgency….

    http://www.syedsaleemshahzad.com/

  • US’s Next Invasion-Pakistan.

    The tenuous relation between Pakistan and  US seems to be at a breaking point.

    Continued refusal of Pakistan to own up its hand in terrorism,through ISI and its ambivalent statements on its role; collaborating with Al-Qaeda or cooperating with the world ,especially the US,in fighting terrorism;its sheltering of Osama bin laden(only the very naive and idiots will buy the story that pakistan did not about Osama,s hiding in Pakistan),seem to be the last straw.

    US does not seem to have any other option but to occupy to eradicate the menace of terrorism.

    Repeated assertions by the US,including Obama , that US will resort to Abbottabad like operations inside Pakistan seems to confirm this.

    Considering the mainstream media’s sensationalism and propaganda tactics and their cemented role as an extension of the establishment, one must step back and take in the entire landscape, the context, connections, and of course the timing. Only after that, after putting the pieces together instead of dumbly staring at the images spread before us by the media, we have a chance to get a grasp of the reality-facts; or at least a chance to come up with real questions.

    “The helicopters that landed in Abbottabad won’t be the last to put American troops on the ground in Pakistan, I see the whole thing as a mess, and I think that we are going to be in Pakistan. I think that’s the next occupation and I fear it. I think it’s ridiculous, and I think our foreign policy is such that we don’t need to be doing this.”

    ….

    So what’s their mission statement, and what have these neocons been cooking up with the new face, their new president, Obama? The following is from an article by Jim Lobe in 2009:

    The mission statement opens by listing a familiar litany of threats to the U.S., including “rogue states,” “failed states,” “autocracies” and “terrorism”, but gives pride of place to the “challenges” posed by “rising and resurgent powers,” of which only China and Russia are named.

    …FPI intends to make confrontation with China and Russia the centrepiece of its foreign policy stance. If this is the case, it would mark a return to the early days of the Bush administration, before 9/11, when Kristol’s Weekly Standard took the lead in attacking Washington for its alleged “appeasement” of Beijing… FPI has chosen to push for escalating the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan. The organisation’s first event, to be held here Mar. 31, will be a conference entitled “Afghanistan: Planning for Success”.

    In order for China to sustain its status as the emerging economic superpower, it must take all the necessary steps required in order to have sufficient energy resources for the near future. According to Pakistani think tank, BrassTacks, Chinese interests in the Indian Ocean became visible in 2002, when they invested heavily and began work on the Gwadar Portlocated in Baluchestan, a province of Pakistan.

    The Gwadar Port has its benefits for both Pakistan and China. According to Abdus Sattar Ghazali, executive editor for American Muslim Perspective, “The cost benefits to China of using Gwadar as the port for western China’s imports and exports are as evident as the long-term economic benefits to Pakistan of Gwadar becoming a port for Chinese goods.” Not only does Gwadar enable China to fulfill its energy needs, but it will also provide a strategic military footprint in the Arabian Sea, which has the United States worried.

    In order to halt this, the globalists need to block China’s access to the Arabian Sea by way of Gwadar. According to BrassTacks, to do this, “there needs to be a ‘new Pakistan’ as indicated in Operation Enduring Turmoil.” Operation Enduring Turmoil is PNAC’s plan to disassemble Pakistan into three parts. According to a “game plan” drawn out by Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, in a 2006 article of the Armed Forces Journal, “Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier tribes would be reunited with their Afghan brethren [and] would also lose its Baluch territory to Free Baluchistan. The remaining ‘natural’ Pakistan would lie entirely east of the Indus, except for a westward spur near Karachi.” With this done, what was once the NWFP, a province of Pakistan, is now part of Afghanistan, and what was once Baluchistan, a province of Pakistan, is now its own state, Free Baluchistan. This would force China to impossibly go through Afghanistan and Free Baluchistan in order to reach the Arabian Sea. Such an arrangement would cut China’s route to the Arabian Sea.

    Now, please focus on our three main actors- China, US and in the middle, the strategically important Pakistan. Let’s use our common sense minus logic-clouding details, and consider what happens when the strategically crucial actor in the middle starts straying away from one main actor and moving toward the other.

    This is from November, 2009:

    China has sent out an interesting signal ahead of US president Barack Obama’s scheduled visit to Beijing by offering a set of advanced fighter jets to Pakistan. It has agreed to sell $1.4 billion worth of jets to Islamabad days ahead of the planned visit of the US president Barack Obama to Shanghai and Beijing on November 15-18.

    The move is expected to jolt the US administration as it works on notes and talking points for Obama’s meetings with Chinese leaders. He is expected to discuss Beijing’s relationship with India and its role in internal conflicts inPakistan and Afghanistan…..

    Beijing is keen to reduce US influence on Pakistan, which will make it easier for it to deal with India, sources said. Washington’s recent decision to extend massive financial assistance to Islamabad is seen in some quarters as a policy setback for China…

    Pakistan’s ambassador to China used a recent celebration of his country’s Republic Day to give a rhetoric-filled talk about Beijing-Islamabad relations. If March 23, 1940, was the day the Muslim League decided to establish Pakistan, then the anniversary would be a time to declare that relations with China will define the way forward. ‘We shall take our bilateral relations to new heights,’ Masood Khan proclaimed. […] Pakistan has been moving into China’s sphere of influence for decades and the countries routinely refer to each other as ‘all-weather’ partners.

    This year will mark the 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations. ‘Even when I was there in 1981, ’82, I could see Chinese military factories going up,’ says Stephen Cohen, a Pakistan expert at the Brookings Institution. Now, Pakistan represents a major market for China’s nuclear and military technology. According to SIPRI, a Swedish think tank, over 40 per cent of Chinese arms exports go to Pakistan—the largest share of any country China sells to.”

    Obviously Obama’s day in day out bombing of Pakistan, his ‘let’s drone the hell out of them’ policy, had backfired, producing the opposite effect for his Neoconistic global hegemony objectives. Now, things begin to really heat up; this is from April 17, 2011:

    President Obama’s rhetoric in Delhi had no substance except to rile the Pakistanis. The Delhi card didn’t quite work. The Chinese Premier visited Islamabad and pledged $20 billion in investment in Pakistan during the next five years. How about them apples? The Pakistani retort is what it has always been we need “Friends Not Masters”.

    Britain as a colonial power practiced “Divide and rule” pitting religious and ethnic differences in the Middle East to rule continents. Bhutto famously theorized that the post-colonial powers were working on a “unite and rule” strategy forcing Pakistan to work with India against China.

    “The idea of becoming subservient to India is abhorrent and that of cooperation with India, with the object of promoting tension with China, equally repugnant.” Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto….

    And finally, on April 27, according to my sources, the following catalyst prompts the Obama team to execute the Kill Osama Bin Laden Script. This is the pivotal point in the Bin Laden Death Operation Script as a catalyst for the soon to come Pakistan Occupation:

    Pakistan is lobbying Afghan President Hamid Karzai against building a long-term strategic partnership with the United States, and urging him instead to look to Pakistan and its ally, China, for help in striking a peace deal with the Taliban and rebuilding the economy, according to Afghan officials.

    Washington’’s relations with Pakistan have reached their lowest point in years following a series of missteps on both sides, and Pakistani officials say that they no longer have an incentive to follow the American lead in their own backyard, the report added.

    “Pakistan is sole guarantor of its own interest,” said a senior Pakistani official, adding: “We”re not looking for anyone else to protect us, especially the US. If they”re leaving, they”re leaving and they should go.”

    The next day, on April 28, a senior Pakistani government official said that the Export-Import Bank of China will loan Pakistan $1.7 billion to develop a city-wide train system in the eastern city of Lahore.

    Since the holes-filled and never-explained ‘kill or capture’ operation, the presidential PR machine, the US media and their extension guised under ‘alternative’ have been beating the war drums. After all, as with any wars of ours, public opinion must be shaped, and public backing must be garnered. This is one of the latest reflecting just that

    http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/05/19/bin-laden-death-script-the-needed-trigger-for-next-step-pakistan/

    Oil and Strategic location-what else US does need ?