He also stated that Pakistan’s hands are tainted with blood and it is against the Koran to kill people.
The head of the dargah, Syed Zainul Abedin Ali Khan said that he has not processed any of the paperwork of the Pakistan PM, or his family, ahead of the visit as a mark of protest over the brutal beheading of an Indian soldier along the Line of Control.
“It will be a dishonor to the families of the Indian soldiers who were beheaded by their army. They should bring back the heads of our jawans. I have no idea why he (Pakistan PM) is coming here”, Khan said in comments to ANI News.
Khan had added that he would boycott Ashraf’s visit to the shrine.
Ajmer Sharif Dargah Diwan Zainul Abedin Ali Khan who has said that he will not assist Pakistan Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf in offering prayers at the Sufi shrine of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti – PTI photo
“I will not welcome or be present during his visit to the dargah”, he said.
A Pakistani security team has already arrived in Rajasthan’s Ajmer town ahead of the visit.
Ashraf said he would make the pilgrimage in a personal capacity to pray for the success of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) in upcoming elections. However, External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid has said he will host lunch for the Prime Minister.
Meanwhile the Ajmer Bar Association has demanded that the status of “state guest” given to the Pakistan prime minister be withdrawn.
A month ago when commenting on Viswaroopam controversy,I remarked that it would have been nice had the Muslims objected to the beheading of of Indian soldiers.
The spiritual Head of Ajmer Dargah has spoken as an Indian would and should.
Indian Army Chief confirmed the beading of an Indian soldier by the Pakistanis.
I am deliberately using the term Pakistanis instead of ‘Pakistani Armed Forces‘ as I am not sure whether this was the work of some elements of the Army and might not have had popular approval.
As in Life there are always two sides of a Story.
May be correct.
Pakistani Kills/beheads Indian Soldier
The point is if India had crossed the LoC ,and beheaded a Pakistani, why has not Pakistan come out publicly on this?
However there no denying the Fact that the Indian Electronic Media has become hysterical on this issue, especially The Times Now.
Retaliation by The Armed Forces is not decided in The Media and I am sure the Government will do it its own way.
I am surprised at the interviews of serving generals in the Television Channels!
Read This from ‘The Hindu’
However, the officials who spoke to The Hindu had a very different account — of how a relatively innocuous incident spiralled into a series of murderous clashes, before culminating in the killing of Lance-Naik Sudhakar Singh and Lance-Naik Hemraj. Both armies, the officials said, engaged in aggressive action, driven by the still-fraught situation on the Line of Control.
Early in September, 70-year old Reshma Bi, left the village of Charonda, near Uri, to live with her sons and grandchildren across the Line of Control.
Ms. Reshma and her husband Ibrahim Lohar, a highly-placed military source said, had remained in Charonda after their sons crossed into Pakistan-administered Kashmir several years ago, to escape police investigations of their alleged role in cross-border trafficking. Police officers contacted by The Hindu said that Ms. Reshma appeared to have left in the hope of living out her last years with her family.
Ms. Reshma’s September 11 flight, a senior Srinagar-based military official said, set off alarms at the Uri-headquartered 19 infantry brigade. There, the incident was seen as highlighting vulnerabilities in defences along this stretch of the Line of Control. Charonda is located within metres of the Line of Control, outside of the three-layer counter-infiltration fencing which runs along the frontier.
Inside of a week after Ms. Reshma’s departure, troops of the 9 Maratha Light Infantry began constructing observations bunkers around Charonda, seeking to monitor the movement of villagers.
The construction work — barred by the terms of the Line of Control ceasefire which India and Pakistan agreed on in 2003 — provoked furious protests from Pakistani troops. Indian commanders, the military source said, conceded that the construction was in violation of the ceasefire.
However, they refused to stop work, arguing that the posts faced out towards the village, posing no threat to Pakistan. Early in October, the official said, tensions began to escalate. Pakistan even made announcements over a public address system, demanding that Indian troops end the construction work.
Following the announcement, shells followed. Pakistani troops fired mortar and high-calibre automatic weapons at Indian forward positions. The fire missed its intended target, but killed three villagers, 25-year-old Mohammad Shafi Khatana, 20-year-old Shaheena Bano, and a ninth-grade school student, Liaqat Ali. In the weeks leading up to the New Year, military sources said, hardly a week went by without occasional shots being fired at troops headed to the new observation posts.
Finally, on January 6, matters came to a head. Following a low-grade exchange of fire that night, 19 Infantry Division commander Gulab Singh Rawat sought and obtained permission for aggressive action against the Pakistani position from where his troops were being targeted.
Pakistan insists its post, Sawan Patra, was raided by Indian troops. India has denied the allegation. “None of our troops crossed the Line of Control,” said Jagdish Dahiya, an Indian army spokesperson.
Either way, though, a Pakistani soldier was dead before the shooting ended — and another critically injured..
For a start, both sides’ armies may have beheaded enemy corpses in tit-for-tat exchanges last year…
Indian troops, concerned about the ease with which she seemed to have crossed, started building bunkers around her village to keep a closer eye on residents. Pakistan viewed such a move so close to the frontier as a violation of a cease-fire agreement and tried to halt it by shelling and firing on the area. In October, three villagers were killed by Pakistani shelling, and on Jan. 6, an Indian brigadier general ordered raids on the Pakistani positions, the Hindu report said.
In a statement Thursday, the Indian army said “certain aspects” of the report were incorrect, specifically denying that its troops had crossed the border, known as the Line of Control, on Jan. 6. The army said it had instead carried out “controlled retaliation” for Pakistani cease-fire violations. It also said that the grandmother crossed the border in September 2011 and denied any link between that and recent events.
You must be logged in to post a comment.