Tag: Bhopal

  • ‘Stratfor’ Targets,Controls individuals.Just what is it?

    Stratfor Logo.
    Stratfor.

    Stratfor is US( Austin,Texas) based organisation specialising in the gathering of intelligence on behalf of its Clients,Corporates and Governments.

    The Intelligence thus gathered is used by these to evaluate, decide and draw their strategies.

    The organisation is reported to be run by Ex CIA personnel.

    I do not know how far this is true.

    The organisation has a website that would forward you its reports.

    You have to sign in for the reports at their portal.

    Some information provided there are shocking.

    In the meanwhile Julian Assange of Wikileaks has accused Stratfor of compromising individual Freedom and violating Privacy.

    The same job is being done on a grand scale by WikiLeaks, targeting Governments.

    Case of Kettle calling the pot Black or the other way around?

    Both WikiLeaks and Stratfor have one thing in common, Publicity and Money.

    “February, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files – more than five million emails from the Texas-headquartered “global intelligence” company Stratfor. The emails date from between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defense Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor’s web of informers, pay-off structure, payment-laundering techniques and psychological methods, for example :

    “[Y]ou have to take control of him. Control means financial, sexual or psychological control… This is intended to start our conversation on your next phase” – CEO George Friedman to Stratfor analyst Reva Bhalla on 6 December 2011, on how to exploit an Israeli intelligence informant providing information on the medical condition of the President of Venezuala, Hugo Chavez.

    The material contains privileged information about the US government’s attacks against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks and Stratfor’s own attempts to subvert WikiLeaks. There are more than 4,000 emails mentioning WikiLeaks or Julian Assange. The emails also expose the revolving door that operates in private intelligence companies in the United States. Government and diplomatic sources from around the world give Stratfor advance knowledge of global politics and events in exchange for money. The Global Intelligence Files exposes how Stratfor has recruited a global network of informants who are paid via Swiss banks accounts and pre-paid credit cards. Stratfor has a mix of covert and overt informants, which includes government employees, embassy staff and journalists around the world.

    The material shows how a private intelligence agency works, and how they target individuals for their corporate and government clients. For example, Stratfor monitored and analysed the online activities of Bhopal activists, including the “Yes Men”, for the US chemical giant Dow Chemical. The activists seek redress for the 1984 Dow Chemical/Union Carbide gas disaster in Bhopal, India. The disaster led to thousands of deaths, injuries in more than half a million people, and lasting environmental damage.

    Stratfor has realised that its routine use of secret cash bribes to get information from insiders is risky. In August 2011, Stratfor CEO George Friedman confidentially told his employees : “We are retaining a law firm to create a policy for Stratfor on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. I don’t plan to do the perp walk and I don’t want anyone here doing it either.”

    Stratfor’s use of insiders for intelligence soon turned into a money-making scheme of questionable legality. The emails show that in 2009 then-Goldman Sachs Managing Director Shea Morenz and Stratfor CEO George Friedman hatched an idea to “utilise the intelligence” it was pulling in from its insider network to start up a captive strategic investment fund. CEO George Friedman explained in a confidential August 2011 document, marked DO NOT SHARE OR DISCUSS : “What StratCap will do is use our Stratfor’s intelligence and analysis to trade in a range of geopolitical instruments, particularly government bonds, currencies and the like”. The emails show that in 2011 Goldman Sach’s Morenz invested “substantially” more than $4million and joined Stratfor’s board of directors. Throughout 2011, a complex offshore share structure extending as far as South Africa was erected, designed to make StratCap appear to be legally independent. But, confidentially, Friedman told StratFor staff : “Do not think of StratCap as an outside organisation. It will be integral… It will be useful to you if, for the sake of convenience, you think of it as another aspect of Stratfor and Shea as another executive in Stratfor… we are already working on mock portfolios and trades”. StratCap is due to launch in 2012. ”

    http://wikileaks.org/the-gifiles.html

    Some information relating to India found in Stratfor.

    “The Indian military is planning a 20,000-troop war drill, one of its largest, near the India-Pakistan border, an Indian army spokesman said Feb. 27, AFP reported. The spokesman said the maneuvers, which will include 200 Russian-made tanks and the country’s latest warplanes, will occur in the Indian state of Rajasthan from March to May. According to an army statement, frontline combat vehicles, artillery, tanks, fighter jets, helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles, air defense weapons and military radar will be used.”

    http://www.stratfor.com/situation-report/india-military-plans-war-drills-near-pakistan-border

    The website claims the e-mails, dated between July 2004 and late December 2011, “reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co.” Here is a sample of what “informants” were telling Dow about the Bhopal tragedy.

    E-mail from morson@stratfor.com to Stratfor officials, on 23 December 2010: This e-mail appears to profile the leaders of Students for Bhopal Advisory Board, a US-based activist group. The Stratfor analyst describes the Board as “representing the North American grassroots supporters of the International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal”. The e-mail profiles the seven leaders of the Board in detail, describing their views and what they have done for Bhopal victims.

    E-mail from Ann Sigsby, senior analyst, Allis Information Management to Dow officials, on 21 December 2010: Sigsby talks about PTI, the news agency, doing a report on ‘Bhopal gas verdict, compensation issues made headlines in MP’ as part it annual review of top annual stories. Sigsby tells Dow officials there were “multiple pickups through India media websites” of the PTI story. The e-mail talks of The Hindu’s front page carrying an article on the BJP criticizing the Congress for allowing William Anderson, Union Carbide chief during the gas tragedy “to get away”.

    E-mail from Ann Sigsby, 3 March 2011, to Dow officials: “Things are much quieter today on the Bhopal issue,” Sigsby begins her mail. Sigsby refers to two Indian newspapers writing articles about a protest against Dow participating in a trade show. It quotes a New York Times reporter’s article questioning whether companies were influencing the Indian origin governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal. Dow had reportedly contributed $100,000 to a charitable foundation run under Jindal’s wife’s name. The NYT article noted that Dow had not been fined for a December 2009 chemical spill in St. Charles parish, despite the state proposing a fine for the companies.”

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Stalking-Bhopal-the-Stratfor-mails-on-gas-tragedy/Article1-818078.aspx

     

  • Supreme Court Failed the People-Bhopal Gas Tragedy.

    On The Bhopal gas Tragedy ,where over  15,000 people  were killed  and several thousands   maimed to the leak of deadly methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas in December, 1984 the Supreme Court of India pronounced its judgement that” the 1996 verdict was not “binding” on the trial court which failed to appreciate the correct legal provision for trying the accused under the stringent provision in the tragedy that killed over 15,000 people and maimed several thousands to the leak of deadly methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas in December, 1984″.

    The people who survived the disaster are still suffering from the after effects.

    True , the CBI is at fault for diluting the charges.

    However the Court had ” left it open to the Sessions Court there to consider restoring stringent charges against the accused, who had got punishment under lighter provisions”.

    The Court knows the enormity of the Tragedy and the injustice meted out to the affected for no fault of theirs, by the CBI to cater to the need of the of the vested interests.

    Throwing the ball back to the CBI is meaningless.

    Judiciary is perceived to be last refuge of the Common man in India to-day, not withstanding Dinakarans and PF Fraudsters.

    After all the Judiciary is a part of the society where people’s grievances are to be met.

    Taking umbrage under’ material available at the time of th trial’,’it is years old’ is fine.

    But it does not reflect the spirit of the Law,especially in this case.

    The Court knows, apart from wanton inefficiency of the CBI , the time it could take to deliver the judgement.

    Even if one were to appoint a Special Commission, there are appeals galore, when the affected and the perpetrators will be no more.

    It becomes a travesty of Justice.

    Instead the Court could have directed the CBI to file a fresh case, indicating provisions to be charged with and monitor the progress of the case.

    It has tken a commendable action in 2 G scam

    Why not in this case?

    If this is a violation of Law and Constitution, be it.

    This is the tragedy.

    Story:

    Holding that the 1996 judgement that diluted charges against the accused was “not binding”, the apex court dismissed a curative petition filed by the CBI saying it was based on a “wrong and fallacious plea” and filed after a lapse of 14 years.

     “In our view, on the basis of the material on record, it is wrong to assume that the 1996 judgement is a fetter against proper exercise of powers by a court of competent jurisdiction under the relevant provisions of the Code,” a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia said.

    http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bhopal-tragedy-sc-refuses-to-reopen-case-leaves-harsher-punishment-to-sessions-court/788889/

    related:

    On 7 June 2010 seven former employees of the Union Carbide subsidiary, all Indian nationals and many in their 70s, were convicted of causing death by negligence and each sentenced to two years imprisonment and fined Rs.1 lakh (US$2,124; €1,776). All were released on bail shortly after the verdict.

    The Chairman and CEO of Union Carbide, Warren Anderson, had been arrested and released on bail by the Madhya Pradesh Police in Bhopal on December 7, 1984. The arrest, which took place at the airport, assured Anderson would meet no harm by the Bhopal community. Anderson was taken to Union Carbide’s house after which he was released six hours later on $2,100 bail and flown out on a government plane.
    • Medical staff were unprepared for the thousands of casualties.
    • Doctors and hospitals were not informed of proper treatment methods for MIC gas inhalation. They were told to simply give cough medicine and eye drops to their patients.
    • The gases immediately caused visible damage to the trees. Within a few days, all the leaves fell off.
    • 2,000 bloated animal carcasses had to be disposed of.
    • “Operation Faith”: On December 16, the tanks 611 and 619 were emptied of the remaining MIC. This led to a second mass evacuation from Bhopal.
    • Complaints of a lack of information or misinformation were widespread. The Bhopal plant medical doctor did not have proper information about the properties of the gases. An Indian Government spokesman said that “Carbide is more interested in getting information from us than in helping our relief work.”
    • As of 2008, UCC had not released information about the possible composition of the cloud.
    • Formal statements were issued that air, water, vegetation and foodstuffs were safe within the city. At the same time, people were informed that poultry was unaffected, but were warned not to consume fish.
    • http://speakindia.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/bhopal-gas-tragedy-disturbing-facts/