Category: Economy

  • Half World Wealth With 85 People Beware Of Cataclysm.

    Contrary to what many think the touted Economic Growth in The World has increased the divide between the Rich and The Poor.

    With Communism long dead and buried, the Media in the hands of the Rich, one  does not get to know what the less fortunate have or feel about this economic prosperity.

    last Sunday I watched a Talk show Neeya , Naana, in Star Vijay Tamil TV Channel on the Chasm that exist between the college Going youth of the affluent and the less fortunate.

    The difference between the rich and poor  did exist even when I was in my college(1967-70)

    But the conscious behaviour of the well to do was negligible.

    Now the attitude and the behaviour of both the classes are belligerent towards each other.

    So is the divide between the Rich, Lower middle and middle classes in India.

    After the dawn of the IT Industry, a new class of neo Rich has sprung up, mainly from the lower middle class.

    By nature,the Middle classes in India try to be what they are not even while when they were not affluent.

    But with this IT money this has increased alarmingly.

    Even for small things that can be done by themselves poor people are hired.

    While one used to go out to buy vegetables by walk or at the most by a Scooter, people now use a car or send a servant maid.

    They no longer buy cinema tickets by standing in the Theaters.

    Nor do In find them stand in queue in Railway Stations to reserve tickets in advance, .

    What can be bought in a push cart selling vegetables, people go to Supermarkets of even Hyper Markets to buy Vegetables.

    Servants , Servant maids are engaged, in many cases as ‘living in ‘are engaged in house hold work and are paid anywhere between 5000 to Rs 10,000 per month.

    Often I find these maids have children who have left their children in Free Hostels for study.

    And they  seem to relish their jobs.

    Those who employ them, the neo rich, flaunt their money carelessly.

    This is restricted to Homes.

    One would this group in the malls, where they spend money recklessly, paying at least 200 % more for the same product that can be bought very economically outside.

    Whom do you find at these Malls as Sales girls and Salesmen?

    People of the same class whom on engages  for work at Home.

    These boys and girls are of the same age group that buys things flaunting their money in a vulgar fashion.

    These use a Five hundred Rupee or a Thousand Rupee note very carelessly and often leave this at Home around every place.

    Leave alone the issue of tempting these needy into stealing, are these people aware the resentment they are building in the people who are working for them?

    This, on a Macro Scale is being witnessed in the Society, Government,Media.

    The Government aided by Media is obsessed with stock market and Gold Prices and you find extensive coverage of this news next only to Rapes ans Scams in the Media.

    There seems to be no reporting on the issues of the poor or their grievances.

    I have heard, with out their knowledge, the way these less fortunate look at these things.

    Without going into specifics,  can say that they are seething with anger at these people, the system.

    While we try to convince ourselves we have achieved what we have by hard work, they think that we have usurped these opportunities from them and the system is designed by us to cheat them, deprive them.

    What they are waiting is an Opportunity and a Demagogue of Leader r to ignite a Revolution, which I feel will be cataclysmic.

    On the national level we think we are growing.

    But we are disrupting the Social order.

    Whatever we may say it is a fact that the world is controlled by the Rich than ever before and is run by the Rich , of the Rich  and for the Rich.

    Read this.

    50 % of World wealth is controlled by 85 Rich people.!

    The world’s wealthiest people aren’t known for travelling by bus, but if they fancied a change of scene then the richest 85 people on the globe – who between them control as much wealth as the poorest half of the global population put together – could squeeze onto a single double-decker.

    The extent to which so much global wealth has become corralled by a virtual handful of the so-called ‘global elite’ is exposed in a new report from Oxfam on Monday. It warned that those richest 85 people across the globe share a combined wealth of £1tn, as much as the poorest 3.5 billion of the world’s population.

    Working for the Few - Oxfam reportSource: F. Alvaredo, A. B. Atkinson, T. Piketty and E. Saez, (2013) ‘The World Top Incomes Database’, http://topincomes.g-mond.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/ Only includes countries with data in 1980 and later than 2008. Photograph: Oxfam

    The wealth of the 1% richest people in the world amounts to $110tn (£60.88tn), or 65 times as much as the poorest half of the world, added the development charity, which fears this concentration of economic resources is threatening political stability and driving up social tensions.

    It’s a chilling reminder of the depths of wealth inequality as political leaders and top business people head to the snowy peaks of Davos for this week’s World Economic Forum. Few, if any, will be arriving on anything as common as a bus, with private jets and helicopters pressed into service as many of the world’s most powerful people convene to discuss the state of the global economy over four hectic days of meetings, seminars and parties in the exclusive ski resort.

    Winnie Byanyima, the Oxfam executive director who will attend the Davos meetings, said: “It is staggering that in the 21st Century, half of the world’s population – that’s three and a half billion people – own no more than a tiny elite whose numbers could all fit comfortably on a double-decker bus.”

    Oxfam also argues that this is no accident either, saying growing inequality has been driven by a “power grab” by wealthy elites, who have co-opted the political process to rig the rules of the economic system in their favour.

    In the report, entitled Working For The Few (summary here), Oxfam warned that the fight against poverty cannot be won until wealth inequality has been tackled.

    “Widening inequality is creating a vicious circle where wealth and power are increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few, leaving the rest of us to fight over crumbs from the top table,” Byanyima said.

    Oxfam called on attendees at this week’s World Economic Forum to take a personal pledge to tackle the problem by refraining from dodging taxes or using their wealth to seek political favours.

    As well as being morally dubious, economic inequality can also exacerbate other social problems such as gender inequality, Oxfam warned. Davos itself is also struggling in this area, with the number of female delegates actually dropping from 17% in 2013 to 15% this year.

    How richest use their wealth to capture opportunities

    Polling for Oxfam’s report found people in countries around the world – including two-thirds of those questioned in Britain – believe that the rich have too much influence over the direction their country is heading

    Source:

    http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jan/20/oxfam-85-richest-people-half-of-the-world

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Where Is The Fort Knox Gold? Fake Gold Bars

    Gold in the US , Fort Knox, is suspect.

    Fort Knox Gold.
    This imaged article from 1981 and excerpted commentary below it will set the landscape for the scandal that is just now unraveling before the world. To date, we have not been able to uncover any official refutations, disclaimers or denials from the USG or Federal Reserve. http://www.knology.net/~bilrum/811215_FtKnoxGold_globe.jpg
    Click to Enlarge.

    Gold is reported to have been missing or misappropriated .

    Only Live Science.com says it is there.

    No other verification.

    Read this.

    Most of the official gold reserves must be located in the Fort Knox vault, which was expressly built before the Second World War. It accumulated the gold bought for $20.00 per troy ounce from individuals and companies all across the US according to a decree issued by President Franklin Roosevelt. Most of the gold came from the banks comprising the Federal Reserve System (FRS) and they received the so-called gold certificates, which in turn were declared in their balance sheets. Some call this a coercive buyout of metal but was actually a confiscation of gold. Upon completion of the operation the price of gold was revised at $35.00.

    There were no regular controls over the American gold since the beginning of the 50’s. There were only some random checks. After the closure of the «gold window» in the early 70’s (suspension of gold for dollars convertibility), it was decided to audit the reserves. Some random audits were carried out between 1974 and 1986, and were suspended following pressure exerted by the Inspector General of the Department of Finance.

    Doubts about the availability of the US gold reserves have been growing in the USA and other countries for the last 10-15 years. The following versions are being discussed:

    1. The American Treasury’s gold remains in place, but since it’s subject to various transactions (i.e. instrumental as collateral), it currently does not belong to the Treasury.

    2. The gold from the official treasuries is no longer in the depository (not in full as listed in the Department of Finance’s accountability). It was moved following sale, leasing and credit operations.

    3. There actually are gold bars in the reserves which correspond to the quantities accounted by the Department of Finance, but they are all or partially fake gold bars. In order to hide the illegal removal of the gold, the real bars were replaced by fake ones made of tungsten.

    4. The gold in the official reserves does no longer belong to the Treasury, it has been returned to the banks (from which it originated in the 30’s). The US government borrowed such large sums from the FRS member banks, that the Treasury was forced to repay in gold.

    Many critics of the FRS note that the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury are communicating vessels, and the official gold reserves formally belonging to the government, are in fact under control of the banksters.

    2. The Congress of the USA calls for a gold audit

    Those who initiated procedures for an audit of the US’s gold reserves are working on two fronts: they are demanding for an audit of the Federal Reserve and of the Treasury of the United States. There were several attacks on the Federal Reserve following the first wave of the financial crisis. In the middle of 2012, the United States House of Representatives supported a draft bill for a full audit of the Federal Reserve. But the bill hasn’t been passed, since the banking community motivated against the audit has many allies in the US Senate. There might be a leakage of secret information regarding their cooperation with the Treasury for an illegal use of the gold reserves, including a secret allocation by the Federal Reserve of $16 trillion to major American and foreign banks during the last financial crisis.

    According to some critics of the Federal Reserve, the money rulers of the US have set aside any possible discretion and have forsaken any secrecy in their illegal operations… Here’s one such good example. In 2004 and 2005, the Treasury accountability determined the gold reserves as worth $10,924 million (the official cost of the gold is still based on the 1973 cost, in round figures at about 42 per troy ounce). But the consolidated balance sheet of the Federal Reserve lists its gold certificates as worth $11,036 million. Such discrepancy is not acceptable; the net worth value of the gold reserve has to coincide with the volume of the gold certificates. This arisen inconsistency of $112 million is a contravention of the Gold Reserve Act. Even though the money rulers have restored the 2006 balance (having noticed their bungle), a feeling remains that the banksters are busy pursuing illegal gold transactions.”

    Fake Gold in Fort Knox?

    It’s one thing to counterfeit a twenty or hundred dollar bill. The amount of financial damage is usually limited to a specific region and only affects dozens of people and thousands of dollars. Secret Service agents quickly notify the banks on how to recognize these phony bills and retail outlets usually have procedures in place (such as special pens to test the paper) to stop their proliferation.

    But what about gold? This is the most sacred of all commodities because it is thought to be the most trusted, reliable and valuable means of saving wealth.

    A recent discovery — in October of 2009 — has been suppressed by the main stream media but has been circulating among the “big money” brokers and financial kingpins and is just now being revealed to the public. It involves the gold in Fort Knox — the US Treasury gold — that is the equity of our national wealth. In short, millions (with an “m”) of gold bars are fake!

    http://www.infowars.com/fake-gold-bars-in-bank-of-england-and-fort-knox/

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-gold-reserve-audit-show/5326810#

    The point is there is evasion and uncertainty about the Gold in Fort Knox.

    If Nations cheat the International Monetary System how does one expect the world Currencies to be stable?

    The purpose of the series of posts is talk about Falling Indian Rupee and not US malpractices.

    Therefore I leave this at that and proceed on Indian Economy to-day.

    continues..

    Related:

    Read this from the Link:

    AUDIO LETTER(R)” is a registered trademark of Audio Books, Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape recording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio Books, Inc.
    —————————————————————–
    This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20006.
    Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 27, 1981, and this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 70.

    Topic #3–

    For eight years now the powers that be here in America have kept a blackout on the covered up FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL in our allegedly free press, but outside the United States there is a new upsurge of journalistic interest in what has happened to our gold.

    Source:

    http://www.24hgold.com/english/contributor.aspx?article=4334464086G10020&contributor=Charleston+voice

    http://ramanisblog.in/2013/09/26/falling-rupee-vs-us/

    http://ramanisblog.in/2013/09/26/rupee-and-exchange-rate/

  • Rupee And Exchange Rate

    Let’s take the Home analogy further to understand Exchange Rates.

    Gold Bars.
    Gold Bars.

    When you can not meet your expenses, you borrow, say, from your neighbor.

    Nothing will go wrong if he does not borrow like you.

    If he borrows from the next man, the cycle of borrowing goes on and extends through out your city.

    Here money you actually have has not increased.

    What happens is that you get money from some one who has spare(because his Wants are less than yours) and on a large-scale  the artificial money is high when compared to the produce available.

    So the city gets things from the next city or where the produce is available.

    The hitch is they are also running into the same confusion of artificial money there.

    This cycle goes on.

    This is exactly what is happening to the World Economy now.

    Another point to note is that when you buy from the others as a produce, it has to be valued.

    Barter system did not have this problem.

    You wanted something which you do not have ,another man has and has no need of it when you ask him.

    The question of Money and valuation does not arise.

    Thanks to Money Value system, some Value has to be fixed as Values of products vary.

    Some joker said God is the standard and fixed it as a medium of exchange.

    That is when you want  to pay others you pay a in a Currency the value of which is determined by the Gold your group, in this case, the Government holds.

    The fallacy here is that the price of Gold is not Fixed and it is variable, though currency is linked to Gold taking Gold Value as Fixed.

    To prevent the process of not having adequate Gold every Nation has to maintain a Gold Reserve.

    It is unsaid that if one country does not or can not pay the Gold it has, can be sold by the Debtor to realize his dues.

    Fun is that who will buy that and at what rate!

    This option has never been resorted to nor even talked about .

    Linked Exchange System.

    A system of managing a nation’s currency and exchange rate by linking the national currency to another base currency that is held at a fixed ratio in deposit at domestic banks.

    Once the exchange rate is set, there is typically no interference from the government or through monetary policy decisions that will affect the exchange rate. Currency is only issued when there are reserves in the linked currency to back it up. If the exchange rate begins to shift from the fixed ratio, currency is immediately added to or taken out of circulation to bring the ratio back into balance.

    This is different from simply pegging one currency to another; in a linked exchange rate system, currency can only be issued when confirmed reserves in the linked currency are held at local banking institutions. In Hong Kong, for example, this means that every Hong Kong dollar that is floating around in the economy is backed by several U.S. dollars held in reserve.

    The advantage of this system is that it stabilizes the currency and keeps inflation ultra low. On the downside, the nation using it can’t leverage advantages in trading with foreign partners, and can’t carry out monetary policy to adapt to shifts in the domestic economy.

    Now the cost of Excavation of Gold is shooting up,

    When the cost of the Fixed Gold is variable, how come the related exchange rate is expected to remain constant?

    The people are paid, at the Mine itself based on the value of Gold at a predetermined Price while the Gold  they extract is costlier.

    Can there be anything sillier than this?

    Underlying problems are these in Gold Standard.

    1.Gold Price is variable and not fixed, it is fixed in the minds of Politicians, economists.

    2.Demand goes up every year, from Governments and Public, leading to less Produce more demand.

    3.There is high speculative market in Gold, akin to Online trading where no physical transaction place;everything is notional and paper Transaction to ensure demand and hence Profits.

    4.Fundamental of any sound economic system is Savings.

    To ensure Global economic stability all Nations must ensure the habit of Savings backed by Manufacturing .

    The greatest culprit is the self-proclaimed and yes-men of the world, is the USA.

    `It has disproportionate demand to what it produces and gobbles up be it energy or electronics.

    people think it is because of its Economy.

    No it is because of its military might Nations imagine it it o be a Giant in Economy.

    If the US stops its Imports it is gone with no Gold Reserves.

    Now this brings the issue of Gold that is in Fort Knox.

    Gold as we have seen is the bedrock on which the Exchange System is Built up.

    What is in Fort Knox, US?

    An estimated $130 billion in gold was in Fort Knox.(2012)

    Is it?

    Reference;

     http://www.livescience.com/32328-how-much-gold-is-in-fort-knox.html      

    http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/linked-exchangerate-system.asp

    Continues…

     

     

  • Falling Rupee Vs US $

    world economy 2012.
    Description English: Gross domestic product based on purchasing-power-parity (PPP) share of world total in 2012

    The fall of Indian Rupee against US $ is phenomenal .

    It has resulted in spiraling prices, causing hardship to people across all the sections of the society.

    The ornamental tinkering by the RBI, like cancelling 0% rate is no solution.

    Lets us look at this issue in simple English.

    Economy is determined by Demand and Supply.

    Higher the demand, less supplies, the prices of products go up.

    That means more money in circulation and less produce.

    In this case the producers stand to gain for the specific produce they produce but have to shell out more money for the other products,

    So what they earn on one hand goes out by the other.

    So , all in all, every one pays more than what they can and what the produce is worth(here one should know the products ‘worth’ is only ‘notional’)

    To restrict this Governments discourage by increasing Savings incentives and by making the produce dearer by tax .

    This is scene number 1.

    Next scene is when then there is more produce , less money

    Here the producers get less for their produce.

    Others look to gain but it is an illusion for the society can not meet the total demand and this drives the prices higher.

    So we come to the first scene.

    The Cycle is complete.

    To put it jargon, inflation and deflation occur.

    For inflation, you restrict money supply and this after some time causes Deflation.

    This forms a vicious cycle.

    If we look at a Home and understand how we budget this will become easy.

    We have a fixed income.

    We have expenses,

    We allocate money for each item and if we find this more, we , if we are intelligent, cut down our expenses by not buying more.

    The non prudent will borrow forgetting that they have to pay up the next month thus increasing the next month deficit.

    Most people, especially of this generation, budget more than they earn and borrow.

    This causes strain on the Home budget.

    So they work more, without trying to cut down expenses.

    This will go on till it breaks one day.

    This exactly what has happened to Indian Economy.

    The basic difference is that in our Homes we do not link our Income to the neighbor’s Income when we plan our expenses.

    In modern economy, which , in my opinion , is complete non sense , skullduggery, book fudging and downright criminal to aid the rich and the corporate, spending beyond means is taken as indicator of Growth.

    Taking the Keynesian Model as its Gospel, Indian economy is following the doomed path traveled by Brazil, Argentina, Greece and Ireland.

    How?

    To be continued.

  • “Keynes Gay” Ferguson Apology Why

    Harvard History Professor Niall Ferguson  tendered  an unconditional Apology for his remark at a conference in California on Thursday about John Maynard Keynes that  the economist John Maynard Keynes did not care about society’s future because he was gay and had no children.

    Be that as it may, it is a fact that Keynes was a Homosexual.

    He had no children.

    There can be no objection to stating the facts.

    His Economic Theories, as I have remarked in various posts, have wreaked havoc, take for instance, Argentina, Ireland,Greece.

    The other countries’ woes have not been publicized.

    His Capitalistic outlook can be gleaned from,

    John Maynard Keynes Русский: Джон Мейнард Кейн...

    John Maynard Keynes.

    “Keynes had begun a theoretical work to examine the relationship between unemployment, money and prices back in the 1920s.[28] The work, Treatise on Money, was published in 1930 in two volumes. A central idea of the work was that if the amount of money being saved exceeds the amount being invested – which can happen if interest rates are too high – then unemployment will rise. This is in part a result of people not wanting to spend too high a proportion of what employers pay out, making it difficult, in aggregate, for employers to make a profit.

    Precisely the reason why the World is going through Economic upheavals by following this non sense.

    Ferguson, as a professor of History, has passed an opinion most of them facts, excepting the part about,’ people with no children having no vision of welfare of the Society”

    I see no point in objecting to the statement of Ferguson.

    “Keynes’s early romantic and sexual relationships were almost exclusively with men.[114] At Eton and at Cambridge, Keynes had been in many homosexual relationships; significant among these early partners were Dilly Knox and Daniel Macmillan.[14][115] Keynes was open about his homosexual affairs, and between 1901 to 1915, kept separate diaries in which he tabulated his many sexual encounters.[116] Keynes’s relationship and later close friendship with Macmillan was to be fortuitous; through Dan, Macmillan & Co first published his Economic Consequences of the Peace.[117]Attitudes in the Bloomsbury Group, in which Keynes was avidly involved, were relaxed about homosexuality. Keynes, together with writer Lytton Strachey, had reshaped the Victorian attitudes of the influential Cambridge Apostles; “since [their] time, homosexual relations among the members were for a time common”, wrote Bertrand Russell.[118] One of Keynes’s greatest loves was the artist Duncan Grant, whom he met in 1908. Like Grant, Keynes was also involved with Lytton Strachey,[114] though they were for the most part love rivals, and not lovers. Keynes had won the affections ofArthur Hobhouse,[119] as well as Grant, both times falling out with a jealous Strachey for it.[120] Strachey had previously found himself put off by Keynes, not least because of his manner of “treat[ing] his love affairs statistically”.

    Ray Costelloe (who would later marry Oliver Strachey) was an early heterosexual interest of Keynes.[122] Of this infatuation, Keynes had written “I seem to have fallen in love with Ray a little bit, but as she isn’t male I haven’t [been] able to think of any suitable steps to take.”

    In 1921, Keynes fell “very much in love” with Lydia Lopokova, a well-known Russian ballerina, and one of the stars of Sergei Diaghilev‘s Ballets Russes. For the first years of the courtship, Keynes maintained an affair with a younger man, Sebastian Sprott, in tandem with Lopokova, but eventually chose Lopokova exclusively.[124][125] They married in 1925.[96][114] The union was happy, with biographer Peter Clarke writing that the marriage gave Keynes “a new focus, a new emotional stability and a sheer delight of which he never wearied’

    Story:

    Harvard history professor Niall Ferguson has apologised for saying the economist John Maynard Keynes did not care about society’s future because he was gay and had no children.

    Prof Ferguson, born in Scotland, made the comments at a conference in California on Thursday.”

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22417231

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes#Personal_life