Tamil Writer Prapanchan has published a Book ‘துறவாடைக்குள் மறைந்த காதல் மனம்’.
A review has appeared in the Junior Vikatan of 29/2/2012.
Some excerpts were reproduced in the Magazine.
The writer is supposed to have looked into Ancient Tamil Literature and seems to provide(the review says) a new insight into Tamil Literature, which none has seen fit to think over a thousand years.
Just what are these ‘insights?’
The Tamil Literature of ‘எட்டுத்தொகை ,பத்துப்பாட்டு மற்றும் பிற பதினெட்டு நூல்களும் , மற்றும் மணிமேகலை etc ‘ ‘are written in Tamil but are not Tamil Literature’
Reason?
The Author states”
All the Poets of these Ages were the Sycophants and were dependent on Kings and hence they represented the ‘Ruling Class’s View’ of Life”
He is supposed to have quoted from Tamil Literature.
I do not have the relevant quotes as it is not available with me now.
Those who have a passing knowledge of Tamil will know of the Poem
‘மன்னவனும் நீயோ ,வளநாடும் உனதோ .’ where the Poet slams the King.
Nor are people unaware of the Poem ‘கொங்குதேர் வாழ்க்கை அன் சேய்த்தும்பி ‘ where the Poet has challenged Lord Siva;
or of Avvaiyaar who helped defuse the tension between two Kings.
Do not forget there were lot of Tamil Kings who were Poets of repute, including Ilango Adigal,Adhiveerarama Padiyan,Raja Rajan .
I can quote more.
Poets of the earlier ages were more forth right in condemning Kings where they at fault unlike Vaali and Vairamuthu of this day.
Could have been few exceptions then.
A sweeping statement that all Poets of the earlier ages were the puppets of the rulers is idiotic.
Another profound statement is that Manimegali was forced into Sainthood by her Mother and was not allowed to think on her own!
People who were her contemporaries did not know her, the writer who comes later by Centuries than her knows her mind!
Anything that does not talk about Love and Illicit affairs’களவொழுக்கம் ‘, in the opinion of the Author of the Book, is not Tamil Literature!
Even if it were true then why should Tamil Literature have poems devoted for
‘களவொழுக்கம்’ separately?
They could have included it in the general classification.
Reason is that the poets were,unlike the present ilk, reflecting society as it was.
The problem is you should be either a fiction writer or a Literateur or should know the difference between the two and be proficient in at least one discipline.
One is revealed by what one writes.
Time people started thinking above the navel.
Now I think I know why Tamil has not produced any worth while Literature in the past 100 years and keeps on harping on old glory.
தமிழ் இலக்கியத்தை முறையாய்ப் படியுங்க , அப்பறம் எழுதலாம்
http://www.vikatan.com/article.php?aid=16599&sid=454&mid=2
You must be logged in to post a comment.